The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent
Low-carbohydrate diets and all causes of death

Low-carbohydrate diets and all causes of death

Jun 23, 2021 13:19
Mitchel Nash

Table of Contents

We badly need significant nutritional researchScience is not dependent on geneticsHow do you think this would appear like a suitable research setup?Do you eat more vegetables?

A questionnaire on the eating frequency on which the results of this study are based signifies virtually little scientifically. There can be no meaningful outcome, and it is unethical, considering the sort of impact this may have on people's behaviors, to make a conclusion based on such an inadequate study.

It is difficult to ask people to quantify their food habits over the past few years and expect significant quantitative findings. Over the past few months, one can barely define their eating habits. There are just too many factors for which no conclusion can be controlled in such a study.

We badly need significant nutritional research

It annoys me profoundly that this is a science that is reported, used as evidence for justification of recommendations, etc.

In general (save for some sub-fields) in fact, experiments (such as this) that require important statistics are not well-trained.

The law of big numbers applies in particular (which you should know about as a physicist). Isome would argue that the results of this study, notwithstanding the noise from the report, are probably far more important than a carefully controlled randomized trial with a small cohort (~100).

Self-reporting questionnaires are undoubtedly a well-established approach for these kinds of investigations, and the weaknesses have been well known.

In particular, it is suggested that over several years, many (most) persons can provide significant numeric responses to their eating habits since their patterns seldom alter. Of course, most individuals here will be able to say about how many meals they eat meat each week, how much they consume on average, how often they drink alcohol, and so on. Only approximate averages are of relevance to us.

As for your argument that too many variables cannot be monitored, fine let you hear the name at least 10 and give a good statistical case as to why they have to be monitored in sample size by ~80 000.

In this situation, "good technique" merely indicates a common approach, not necessarily a strong scientific process.

The problem is people. We are not credible witnesses, even of our own past, and, unless we are strictly dietary, most of us mostly go randomly through a small number of food categories with our food intake (even caloric intake can be wildly inconsistent over time). It encountered enough persons who utterly minimize their intake of sweets, e.g. that in their own history records they diminish the incidence of such occurrences psychologically. Alone, many of the low-carb vegans and low-carbon meat-eaters might be in the high-carb group.

The most serious shortcoming of this technique is that there is no proof that human memory gives an accurate estimate for lengthy periods of time when it comes to food consumption. If the reliability of the most basic instrument of your technique cannot be determined, then it is practically useless by definition. The mistake in self-reporting might be so significant that the genuine 80% low-carbon categorization actually is high carb. Or the vegan group may be over 50% high-carbon, etc.

We cannot determine the margins of error without a comprehensive assessment of the precision of the instrument employed in the research (FFQ in this example). However, we have several grounds to believe that the accuracy is considerably high. In this situation, adding additional members to the group does not improve the accuracy, it just increases the loudness of the noise. Is every group's True Low Carb ratio 10% or 90%? Who knows. Who knows.

If the accuracy of the tools cannot be validated, the findings are simply a random decision amongst the various conclusions. It indicates that they did not refute the null hypothesis.

Therefore, it is encouraged to advocate some form of sequestration of smaller populations with comparable genetic composition (several groups for each diet), etc. But this is largely unworkable.

Too frequently weak science may be regarded as "soft" or "applied" scientific study, regardless of its type.

In this connection, even noisy research like these at least indicates that there is no obvious major link between, for example, a low-carb diet, and death. Even brilliant research would indicate if low-carb diet folks started to die decades younger than normal. Studies like these, however small, have some utility in this way.

Science is not dependent on genetics

First of all, because the whole of science is not dependent on genetics. We know (but don't we? At least gene-induced lactose intolerance. Is it too much to imply that reactions to other foods might likewise be genetically modified? Secondly, scientific research itself has an enormous issue. There are books and counter-research on this subject. Basically, you accept a grant, study, and then achieve something if there is nothing that should be a default in your final output, well it doesn't seem good. So, if it's cherry-picked data, you create some results. Then a decade later some statisticians take the raw data and verify that have found nothing. It's always happening. Thirdly, this is particularly a medicinal problem but may also be done in nutritional research. Surely you see the advertisements where volunteers were looking? Well, who do you believe they'll get? Nobody creates research entitled "our study among homeless and abject poverty."

Somewhat dubious, maybe, but the inmates would be a wonderful site for this research. You may accomplish this just by monitoring your consumption and not changing anything in the offer. A valid intake report should be quite realistic.

Yeah, ethics would be difficult, but you MUST regulate food consumption in order to truly perform nutrition studies. Age, weight, calories, activity control, and only varies in dietary configuration to different degrees, etc.

What kind of ethical problems do you think? It would have assumed that good quality meals would attract all the volunteers you could desire, then you would find them in a typical penitentiary. There are undoubtedly other groups where delicious food would be just as tempting as university students.

A more practical problem in jails would be the high frequency of hepatitis and drug use together with all the confounding variables (such as poverty).

In the US, federally sponsored research institutes must follow specific standards in the conduct of research in human beings. A researcher was trained and said that prisoners could not be used as subjects just because they were convenient and that the two situations where they were usually studied were cases when prisoners, criminal activity, or anything inherently specific to prisoners were studied (the example given was HIV).

Why not inmates self-imposed... like a rehabilitation center. You may leave wherever you want but you don't be paid...then you pay them for as much as $5k for 1 month or 5k/month for any study period... Then there's no jail — regulated, but "at-will"

Apart from proposals and other problems, I'm not convinced you rely on food to eat. Prisons still buy food in the commissary in most areas.

If you can acquire a control prison and take care of variations, you might compare jail A against prison B quantitatively. It would be interesting to have only a 20% greater diet between A/B.

Someone already has "done science" in other jails. Way more ethical than the normal ideas that is available on the internet for inmates.

It is contemplated actually doing nutrition study, it's basically a jail, even if it is voluntary. You should be able to lock various populations from any food source and regulate their everyday activities and so on, for at least 2 years, although it is possible that after only six months you can get some results.

How do you think this would appear like a suitable research setup?

And remember: anything based on modern technology will not deliver results until the 2040s or 2050s.

Previous validation studies demonstrated relatively strong relationships between FFQ evaluated energy-adjusted nutrients and various NHS(21) and HPFS food records completed throughout the previous year (20).

In view of the types of impacts that this may have on people's behaviors, it is borderline unethical to make a judgment based on such inadequate research.

Do you eat more vegetables?

This particular behavioral shift would probably not be terrible, but more of a rant for these kinds of research. Poor research in this situation has real-world repercussions (nutrition research), and we need actual knowledge into what diet works best for the person.

Even after you control all that you plan to control, you still have a great confusing element in genetic make-up. Then you need prisons with thousands of identical twins who live in every manner except diet (which is meticulously recorded). You won't just receive an experiment as you can put in physics.

The objective of the author highlighting big restrictions is to admit that this is, unfortunately, the best way to deal with it.

This seems to be a very solid concept, given the enormous amount of data relating 'plant chemicals' (polyphenols, glycosinolates, etc.) to (in the majority) significantly favorable impacts on human biochemistry and physiology.

It's worth noting that "five (fruit and vegetables) a day" is a well-known slogan in the UK and it is elsewhere. But almost anybody explains why it is recommended that the needed fat, protein, carbohydrate, vitamins, and minerals may be delivered without considerable consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables (using supplements).

Mitchel Nash | Mitchel works for a high-tech telecommunication firm as a software engineer with vast experience and management skills. The company creates and provides technologies that help service providers provide high-quality voice and data services over broadband access networks while maximizing their network infrastructure investment. He is in charge of the production of the company's management software products as a senior software engineer. Mitchel has a B.Sc. in Computer Sciences from Tel-Aviv Jaffa Academic College.


How to help an alcoholic partner

Alcoholism is a problem shared by millions of people around the world. It has been on the rise since the previous years and doesn't seem to end despite efforts made by governments, non-profits organizations, and other institutions.

Deep Sleep in Two Minutes 💤 Tips From Experts

Frequency to listen for a better sleep and benefits it can give to the listener

Reiki Practicing For Beginners: What To Expect And How To Do It Correctly

Reiki is a great form of healing therapy most people should consider learning. This guide is about what makes Reiki good and how you can learn Reiki course online.

5 Amazing Morning Rituals to Make Your Day More Mindful

At times, life can feel like it's flying by. At times, it feels as though the mind is always zooming out into the future or dwelling in the past. Imagine being able to slow down to be really mindful of what is going on in your life to find meaning in simple pleasures.

The Best Thai Thermometers For Meat 2021

Everyone needs at least one kind of meat thermometer on hand, whether they're a professional chef or a beginner home cook. These useful gadgets, as the name indicates, monitor the temperature of meat throughout the cooking process. Roasting a chicken, searing a steak, pan-frying pork chops, and poaching fish are all examples of this.

Delta Effex and Delta 8 THC

CBD stands for cannabidiol, which is one of many cannabinoids (chemical substances) present in marijuana and hemp. You're undoubtedly already familiar with tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, which is another psychoactive ingredient found in the cannabis plant.

Foods that boost your metabolism and help you lose weight

Metabolism is an umbrella term used to define all of the chemical reactions and transformations happening within the cells of our bodies that are essential to sustain life. However, people often use the word metabolism interchangeably with metabolic rate.

Most common reasons why car accidents happen and how to avoid them

Car crashes can be dangerous and they can cause some serious damage to both you personally, other parties involved as well as your vehicles. Learning the reasons behind is the best way to avoid them because you will know what to do and what not to.

Top 7 Amazing Benefits Of Playing Piano 🎹 You Don’t Know 😮

Playing music has long been known for its health and mental benefits. For those seeking escape, artistic expression, or just pleasure and delight, the piano has been an unrivaled outlet. More evidence of the advantages of playing the piano has emerged in recent years, connecting music creation to a healthy body, mind, and life.

Tasty Soup: 5 ways to make it healthy and thicken

Soups can easily make for a tasty meal that combines all kinds of nutritious ingredients. They are highly recommended in cold weather when you need something warm and filling.

What Is Reiki And How Can It Improve Your Life?

The best way to answer the question "What is Reiki?" is to let you experience it for yourself through a short demonstration.

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy |