By curbing the practice of dumping waste in valleys, the move represents the most significant administrative action ever taken to address mountaintop removal coal mining, according to one environmental group.
The White House on Thursday took a giant leap toward eliminating new mountaintop coal mining projects in the Appalachian states, issuing strict new guidelines designed to protect headwater streams by curbing the practice of dumping waste in neighboring valleys.
Announcing the changes, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson said the guidelines are intended to make the standards governing new mountaintop projects “clear and consistent,” following a series of EPA decisions over the past year that stakeholders on all sides of the debate found contradictory.
[Environment1] Yet the practical effect of the new standards — which will require mining operations to control levels of toxins in nearby streams — will be to minimize, if not outright preclude, the dumping of mining waste in valleys below the mines. Because the coal industry maintains that most mountaintop projects wouldn’t be worth the additional cost of trucking the debris to more distant dumping sites, the guidelines — if properly enforced — could end most new mountaintop projects before they ever begin.
The move drew immediate criticism from the coal mining industry, which views the new environmental protections as a threat to profits and jobs. But it received high praise from one of the most powerful lawmakers in Appalachia, Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.), a one-time defender of mountaintop mining who more recently has turned a critical eye toward the practice.
At issue is the mining technique known as mountaintop removal, in which companies use dynamite and draglines to blast and scrape away Appalachian peaks in order to access the coal seams within. In the process, the trees, soil, rock and other debris resting atop the coal are often pushed into adjacent valleys, many of which hold tiny streams forming the headwaters of larger bodies of water below.
The technique has been attractive to coal companies, which save money by eliminating trucking needs (valleys are nearby) and labor costs (dynamite is cheap). But it’s also ravaged neighboring communities by poisoning wells and waterways, contaminating air, killing off wildlife and flooding nearby homes. The EPA estimates that nearly 2,000 miles of Appalachian streams have been buried already by mountaintop projects.
The new EPA guidelines are designed to gauge the health of nearby streams based on their levels of conductivity, which is a good indicator of water’s purity. The runoff from Appalachian mines tends to contain toxins like magnesium, sulfate, bicarbonate, and potassium — all ions that raise conductivity levels. The higher the conductivity, the tougher it is for aquatic life to survive.
Under the new EPA guidelines, mining projects expected to raise conductivity levels of nearby streams above 500 micro-siemens per centimeter — five times the normal level — will be rejected. That level has been shown to harm aquatic life, Jackson said, citing “considerable peer reviewed data.” Effectively, the EPA has attached hard numerical standards to environmental protections more vaguely outlined in the Clean Water Act.
Jackson maintained that the intent of the guidelines is not to create a blanket ban on all new mountaintop removal projects. “This is not about ending coal mining,” she told reporters on a conference call Thursday. “This is about ending coal mining pollution.”
Still, the EPA chief also said that there are “no or very few valley fills that will meet standards like this.”
Indeed, EPA estimates that the Spruce No. 1 Mine near Charleston — at 2,300 acres, the largest mountaintop project ever proposed in West Virginia — would send conductivity levels of nearby streams as high as 2,400 micro-siemens per centimeter. For that reason, the agency last week proposed to veto the project.
No one has to explain to the coal industry that the new guidelines are a threat to the lucrative mountaintopping business. The National Mining Association, a trade group, issued a statement Thursday blasting the EPA’s new rules for what it called a failure “to give greater thought to the impact on jobs, affordable electricity and U.S. steel production.”
“EPA continues to point to ’new science’ that has been found to be both flawed and limited in its findings,” the NMA wrote.
On the other side of the debate have been environmental and community groups, which have fought a decades-long battle against mountaintop removal. In their eyes, the EPA’s new guidelines were a godsend after years watching the agency look away as mine after mine was approved.
The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, a West Virginia-based advocacy group, applauded the EPA for “finally listening to scientists.” The Rainforest Action Network cheered the agency for “finally flexing its full authority under the Clean Water Act.” And Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, said the policy represents nothing short of “the most significant administrative action ever taken to address mountaintop removal coal mining.”
The new standards will apply to all mountaintop operations proposed in the future, as well as the nearly 80 pending mountaintop permits the EPA is currently reviewing. The guidelines are specific to the Appalachian states only. “You can’t take this data and apply it outside the region,” Jackson said. But she broached the possibility that the standards could also apply to non-mining projects — things like roads — within the Appalachian states.
The guidelines take effect immediately, although the EPA is accepting public comments and could alter the standards based on that input.
For the Obama administration, it’s been a long road to today’s announcement. On the campaign trail, Obama vowed to end the practice of mountaintop mining in favor of less destructive methods. But the coal industry is a powerful force — and a strong economic engine — in Appalachia. And it has the ear of some of the more influential figures on Capitol Hill, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee. Faced with those competing pressures, the EPA last year took steps to rein in mountaintop removal, but also issued more than 40 surface mining permits, threatening dozens of Appalachian streams.
At least one powerful Appalachian lawmaker was happy about the EPA’s move to define the permitting standards. The 92-year-old Byrd — who spent a lifetime defending the coal industry that practically defines West Virginia’s economy — said Thursday that he was “pleased” that the EPA took “very seriously” his concerns about the need for clear standards to govern the permitting process.
“Today’s announcement,” Byrd said, “will hopefully now have everyone reading off the same page.”
Giffords shooting leads nation to introspection and political finger wagging
In the wake of the shooting in Arizona this weekend that critically injured Rep.
EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management
At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from
E-Verify Mandate Begins Today
The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm
EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules
The EPA seal (Pic via sentryjournal.com) The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.
EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.
EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’
In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work
EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria
The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards
EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’
All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of
EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards
Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some