Big Money and Bundling
A pair of stories raise questions about the role of big-money contributors in this year’s election. The first, an article from The Washington Post this
Jul 31, 202051.1K Shares1.2M Views
A pair of stories raise questions about the role of big-money contributors in this year’s election. The first, an articlefrom The Washington Post this morning, focuses on prominence of "bundlers" — politically-connected individuals who raise large amounts of cash for presidential candidates from family, friends or associates — and zeros in on one in particular. According to The Post, a big-time McCain bundler, Harry Sargeant, has "raised more than $100,000 for three presidential candidates [Rudy Giuliani, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sen. John McCain] from a collection of ordinary people, several of whom professed little interest in the outcome of the election." From The Post:
“„Some of the most prolific givers in Sargeant’s network live in modest homes in Southern California’s Inland Empire. Most had never given a political contribution before being contacted by Sargeant or his associates. Most said they have never voiced much interest in politics. And in several instances, they had never registered to vote. And yet, records show, some families have ponied up as much as $18,400 for various candidates between December and March.
“„Both Sargeant and the donors were vague when asked to explain how Sargeant persuaded them to give away so much money.
“„"I have a lot of Arab business partners. I do a lot of business in the Middle East. I’ve got a lot of friends," Sargeant said in a telephone interview yesterday. "I ask my friends to support candidates that I think are worthy of supporting. They usually come through for me."
While the story does not allege any illegal activity, it does suggest many of the donors appear to know little about who they are contributing to.
“„Donors reached by phone or interviewed in person declined to explain who asked them to make the contributions.
“„Ibrahim Marabeh, who is listed in public records as a Rite Aid manager, at first denied that he wrote any political checks. He then said he was asked by "a local person. But I would like not to talk about it anymore." Neither he nor his wife is registered to vote, but the two donated $4,600 to Clinton and $4,600 to Giuliani in December.
“„At the Twilight Hookah Lounge, owned by Nadia and Shawn Abdalla, patrons smoke tobacco flavored with honey and fruit from a menu that includes the strawberry-flavored Sex on the Beach and the strong, orange-flavored Fuzzy Navel.
“„The Abdallas, who are not registered to vote, said in an interview that they recalled writing a check to an organization in Miami, because a person with that organization was a friend of their mother’s. They said they could not remember his name.
“„Nader, 39, and Sahar Alhawash, 28, of Colton, Calif, who at one point ran the Avon Village Liquor store, donated a total of $18,400 to Giuliani, Clinton and McCain between December and March. About 80 people in the country made such large contributions to all three, and most were wealthy business executives, such as Donald Trump. The Alhawashes declined to comment about the donations. Abdullah Abdullah, a supervisor at several Taco Bell restaurants in the Riverside area, and his wife have donated $9,200 to McCain.
“„Reached at work, Abdullah said he knows little about the campaign. "I have no idea. I’ll be honest with you," he said. "I’m involved in the restaurant business. My brother Faisel recommended John McCain. Whenever he makes a recommendation, we do it."
“„Faisal Abdullah, 49, said he helped organize all of the contributions from members of his family. When he was asked who solicited the contributions from him, he said: "Why does it matter who? I’m telling you we made the contribution. We funneled it through the channel in Florida because that’s the contact we had. I was responsible for collecting it."
The second story, from McClatchy Newspapers, follows the ongoing saga of a Hess office manager and her husband who have drawn attention for donating large sums of money to McCain and the Republican National Committee. From McClatchy:
“„Alice Rocchio is an office manager at the New York headquarters of the Hess Corp., drives a 1993 Chevy Cavalier and lives in an apartment in Queens, N.Y., with her husband, Pasquale, an Amtrak foreman.
“„Despite what appears to be a middle-class lifestyle, the couple has written $61,600 in checks to John McCain’s presidential campaign and the Republican National Committee, most of it within days of McCain’s decision to endorse offshore oil drilling.
“„At a June fundraiser, the Rocchios joined top executives at Hess Corp. — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer John Hess, his wife, Susan, his mother, Norma Hess, and six other officials in giving a total of $313,500 to a joint McCain-RNC fundraising committee, Federal Election Commission records show…
“„A former FEC official said that it’s possible that the Rocchios had the means to make those hefty contributions — their first reported donations to a federal campaign. But the official, who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that their donations also could trigger a complaint or otherwise catch the eyes of the agency’s enforcement staff, tasked to ensure that companies or wealthy individuals don’t illegally circumvent contribution limits by using employees or other third parties as "conduits” for cash.
Again, the article does not accuse the Rocchios of wrongdoing. However, in the wake of the Norman Hsu scandal, the stories raise the possibility that the campaign financing system is susceptible to fraud — particularly for wealthy donors who wish to subvert the law by using others as a vehicle for excessive — and illegal — campaign contributions.
Paula M. Graham
Reviewer
Latest Articles
Popular Articles