What could have been an effective trigger to begin dismantling Roe v. Wade died last week in Louisiana after the state House voted 65-30 to recommit a bill that
What could have been an effective trigger to begin dismantling Roe v. Wade died last week in Louisiana after the state House voted 65-30 to recommit a bill that would have effectively banned abortion. The Associated Press initially reported that Louisiana lawmakers moved against passage after the bill’s author, Rep. John LaBruzzo (R-District 81), provided a fiscal analysis showing that the state was at risk to lose $4.5 billion in federal health care funding through Medicaid were the bill to pass.
Louisiana is an example of anti-abortion rights legislation effectively banning anti-abortion rights legislation.
Over the course of this year, the “personhood” movement, led by national umbrella group Personhood USA, has made headway with various states introducing bills and ballot measures to redefine the beginning of life at conception or fertilization. Such proposed measures have already begun to face legal scrutiny, but Louisiana’s proposal to revise the state’s Human Life Protection Act failed (at least for this year) thanks to existing federal legislation intended to restrict abortion with a ban on federal funding, also known as the Hyde Amendment. What the Hyde Amendment also does, however, is require Medicaid funding of abortion services to terminate pregnancies caused by rape or incest or that would jeopardize the mother’s life.
Personhood USA founder and president Keith Mason recently told a Reuters reporter that the Hyde Amendment has become the most recent stumbling block in ending abortion outright.
“Henry Hyde, a champion of the anti-abortion movement, might turn over in his grave if he knew that a provision of law he authored was an obstacle to individual states banning abortion,” write Reuters’ Kathy Finn.
What happened in Louisiana last week could be an indication that the rape and incest exceptions of the Hyde Amendment will make it difficult for states to enact full-fledged measures criminalizing all abortions in every case -– lest states be stripped of Medicaid funding entirely.
The state vote came a week after a Personhood USA affiliate toured Mississippi to rally support for a personhood amendment on the ballot for the upcoming general election. The so-called “Conceived in Rape” tour was intended to give justification for banning abortion without exception for rape or incest.
Alabama is another state that recently failed to pass abortion-banning legislation. The bill (SB301), intended to define a person as a human being “from the moment of fertilization and implantation into the womb,” failed to reach a final vote in the state House last week, on the last day of the state’s legislative session. Last minute changes were made in the Senate version of the bill that, instead of banning all abortions, would have only banned all surgical abortions and many chemical abortions.
“SB301 started out on the right track, but it had a fatal flaw,” said Personhood USA spokesperson Jennifer Mason in a statement. “The amended version of SB301 essentially stated that personhood begins at implantation – which we know is not the case. Embryology textbooks show that life begins at fertilization, not implantation.”
Giffords shooting leads nation to introspection and political finger wagging
In the wake of the shooting in Arizona this weekend that critically injured Rep.
EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management
At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from
E-Verify Mandate Begins Today
The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm
EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules
The EPA seal (Pic via sentryjournal.com) The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.
EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.
EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’
In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work
EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria
The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards
EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’
All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of
EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards
Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some