Deportation process leaves questions among immigrant advocates
The implementation of a case by case review of at least 300,000 deportation proceedings, announced by the Department of Homeland Security last week, has left room for questions among immigrant advocate groups.
Jul 31, 2020204.6K Shares2.7M Views
The implementation of a case by case review of at least 300,000 deportation proceedings, announced by the Department of Homeland Security last week, has left room for questions among immigrant advocate groups.
With this announcement, Homeland Security said it will implement prosecutorial discretionmeasures laid out in a June 2011 memoissued by John Morton, director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Melissa Crowe, director of the Legal Action Center at the American Immigration Council, said on a conference callMonday, ”We are not sure how” Homeland Security’s commitment “will play out in practice” and what recourse individuals will have “if they believe their cases have been mischaracterized as high priority.”
Crowe added that in an ideal world, Homeland Security “officers throughout the country would stop issuing charging documents on low priority cases so they never enter the system to begin with.”
Mohammad Abdollahi of DREAM Activist writes in an email that “the decision from [Homeland Security] and Obama was nothing new, it pretty much just spelled out what they already had on the books.”
Last week’s announcement, based on the June 2011 memo issued by Morton, lays out a path to implement immigration law enforcement priorities put forward in a 2010 memo also issued by Morton that prioritized the detention and deportation of three groups: “aliens who pose a danger to national security or a risk to public safety,” “recent illegal entrants” and “aliens who are fugitives or otherwise obstruct immigration controls.”
That 2010 document adds, “Nothing in this memorandum should be construed to prohibit or discourage the apprehension, detention, or removal of other aliens unlawfully in the United States. ICE special agents, officers, and attorneys may pursue the removal of any alien unlawfully in the United States, although attention to these aliens should not displace or disrupt the resources needed to remove aliens who are a higher priority.”
Cecilia Muñoz, White House director of intergovernmental affairs, wrote last weekthat Homeland Security, “along with the Department of Justice, will be reviewing the current deportation caseload to clear out low-priority cases on a case-by-case basis and make more room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security risk.”
“There is a lot of uncertainty about what could happen,” Jonathan Fried, executive director of We Count!, writes. He says that ICE “clearly did not implement” its June 2010 priorities.
Fried adds:
“„There is a lot of room for interpretation of who should or shouldn’t have their deportation proceedings dismissed. Just because someone is a low priority doesn’t mean that she or he won’t be deported. And finally, a lot may depend on who is making the decisions. If the same agents on the ground who have been resisting using their discretion and have falsely denounced previous statements from the administration as a “back-door amnesty” are going to be the ones making these decisions about whom to place in proceedings, the announced changes may amount to a lot less than we hoped.
Chris Crane — president of National Council 118-ICE, which represents approximately 7,600 bargaining unit employees at ICE — told the Independent that the Department of Homeland Security and ICE immigration detention reforms excluded ICE managers and officers, adding that “detention reform intended to provide better conditions for non-criminal immigrants made things worse for them and our officers.”
Crane added that ICE management gave no reason why “law enforcement professionals have been excluded from the detention reform process” and that “we are left with one conclusion: This is being done because this administration wants to please special interest groups.”
The union recently saidthat the policy laid out by Morton in his June 2011 memo is a “law enforcement nightmare,” developed by the Obama administration to “win votes at the expense of sound and responsible law enforcement policy.”
The union added: “Tell any ICE agent he or she will have the final say on making an arrest or holding someone in custody and they’ll tell you you’re crazy. Officers will be ordered not to make arrests and failure to comply will result in the end of the agent or officer’s career. That’s business as usual at ICE. It’s unfortunate but the administration protects foreign nationals illegally in the U.S. but does nothing for our employees.”
B. Loewe of the National Day Laborer Organizing Networktells the Independent that the announced case review “may bring with it an expansion of the definition of criminal, because the damaging label is never actually defined. As we’ve seen in Secure Communities, those who they define as criminals are people whose only offense may be driving without a license or may actually only be immigration-related. There’s the potential for many to be condemned under the agency’s new scarlet letter, the title of ‘criminal.’”
Loewe says that the case review means temporary relief, and shows that the president can “provide an executive order that prevents the deportation” of DREAM Act-eligible youth.
Rhyley Carney
Reviewer
Latest Articles
Popular Articles