rssPentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1′s Name
Thursday, May 06, 2010 at 5:35 pm
- 184 Comments
GUANTANAMO BAY — Two weeks’ worth of proceedings in the pre-trial hearing of Omar Khadr found an unexpected meta-conclusion this afternoon as the public affairs shop in the Office of the Secretary of Defense banned four reporters from returning to Guantanamo Bay. Their offense: reporting the name of a witness whose identity is under a protective order.
The four journalists are Michelle Shephard of the Toronto Star, Steven Edwards of Canwest, Paul Koring of the Globe & Mail and Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald. They are not being thrown off the base, but, as of now, they are barred from returning.
A letter written by an official in the Office of the Secretary of Defense’s public affairs division specified that each had published the name of a witness who testified to the military commissions today under the name “Interrogator #1.” Identifying information about that interrogator was entered into the record of the hearing during open court testimony by both the prosecution and the defense. Ironically, the letter confirmed that witness’s identity.
While the judge in the case, Col. Patrick Parrish, issued an admonition yesterday for reporters to respect the anonymity of the classified witnesses, he did not rule that any reporter here had violated the protected order. The decision to block the four reporters from returning to Guantanamo Bay is a matter of policy from the Office of the Secretary of Defense. And those four are not the only ones within the press corps here to have reported Interrogator #1′s name.
Those four reporters comprise much of the institutional knowledge of Guantanamo Bay and the military commissions, as their colleagues widely acknowledge. Shephard has written the most comprehensive account to date of Omar Khadr’s life and experiences in detention at Bagram and Guantanamo Bay, in both her Star reporting and her book Guantanamo’s Child. Rosenberg is the single most diligent, consistent and experienced Guantanamo Bay reporter in the world, having carved out the Guantanamo beat steadily almost since the detention facility here opened in 2002 and traveled here more frequently than any other journalist. (I personally heard complaints about her from public affairs officers here five years ago — and those complaints amounted to whining about how dogged an investigator she was.) Koring and Edwards have also been invaluable resources about Khadr and Guantanamo to their colleagues these past two weeks.
The news organizations themselves are not banned from Guantanamo, just the four reporters, the letter stated. And the ban is appealable, according to the letter, which the four journalists received in an oral briefing from an OSD representative here less than an hour ago and which was only emailed to them afterward. But as it stands now, the flight taking these and the remaining reporters here to cover the Khadr hearing off the base tomorrow represents the end of their final trip to report on Guantanamo Bay.
Update: Here’s the letter that the Pentagon’s Col. Dave Lapan wrote to Rosenberg, Shephard, Edwards and Koring:
Cc: Whitman, Bryan Mr OSD PA
Subject: Ground rule violationsLady and gentlemen: I am writing to inform you that reporters from your
news organizations violated established and agreed-upon ground rules
governing reporting on Military Commissions proceedings at Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba.The Media Policy and Ground Rules for Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
were provided to each member of the media at Andrews Air Force Base before
departure to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on April 26, 2010. Paragraph 2a
delineates the following restriction: “To not publish, release, discuss or
share information identified by commission’s personnel as being Protected
Information or otherwise protected from disclosure by these ground rules.”
Paragraph 2.g. of the ground rules states “The identities of all commission
personnel, to include the Presiding Officer, commission members,
prosecutors, defense counsels, and witnesses, will not be reported or
otherwise disclosed in any way without prior release approval of OSD(PA).”Specifically, your reporters published the name of a witness whose identity
was protected in court. The attached Word document is a collection of four
news articles written AFTER the Military Judge clearly stated on May 5 that
media covering Military Commissions are expected to comply with the
protection orders. All four (4) articles mention “Interrogator #1″ by his
real name.In accordance with paragraph 2 of the same policy, failure to comply with
these ground rules or the Presiding Officer’s instructions could result in
permanent expulsion from the courtroom area and may result in the removal of
the parent news organization from further participation and could subject
the
(NMR) to criminal prosecution.As a result of these violations, these individual reporters are barred from
returning to cover future Military Commissions proceedings. Your news
organizations may continue to cover the proceedings with other reporters.
However, future violations of the ground rules and/or military judge’s
protection orders will result in your news organization losing the ability
to send reporters to Guantanamo Bay.If you desire more information, please contact me via e-mail or phone. If
you wish to appeal this decision, you may contact the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Media Operations, Mr. Bryan Whitman, at
703-697-6647 or bryan.whitman@osd.mil.Regards,
Col. Dave Lapan, USMC
Director, Defense Press Operations
Update: From The Globe & Mail’s official statement:
The Globe’s editor-in-chief, John Stackhouse, condemned the decision against the paper’s Washington-based international affairs correspondent. “We strongly disagree with the Pentagon’s interpretation of its own rules, and intend to fight the ban as a matter of Canadian public interest in these hearings,” he said. “The name in question was a matter of public record. Banning the information now – when it is already known around the world – serves no apparent purpose other than to raise more questions about the credibility of the Guantanamo courts.”
From The Toronto Star:
“This is ridiculous and an unfair ban and the Toronto Star will object strongly to it. Absurd,’’ said Editor Michael Cooke.
Follow Spencer Ackerman on Twitter
184 Comments
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 7:20 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:10 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:11 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:23 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:25 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:30 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:31 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:32 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:34 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:37 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 8:49 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 10:29 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 11:20 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 11:32 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 11:41 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 6, 2010 @ 11:48 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 12:24 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:13 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 12:16 am
So, what's his name? Or do you let the Pentagon dictate your coverage too?
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 12:18 am
What about the Constitution?
Sorry, it doesn't accord with the Pentagon's ground rules.
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:27 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:50 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 12:54 am
He already published it. Follow the link that starts, “Identifying information…”.
I know lots of folks can't be bothered to follow links, but it is wise to do so before criticizing.
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 2:57 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 3:00 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 3:02 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 3:03 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 3:11 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 4:32 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 4:44 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 5:25 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 5:49 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 6:35 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 6:48 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 7:16 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 8:38 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 9:02 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 9:08 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 9:58 am
[...] was reporting the name of a witness whose identity is under a protective order. Spencer Ackerman explains: A letter written by an official in the Office of the Secretary of Defense’s public affairs [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 10:11 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 10:17 am
[...] is also very good). Today, he reports that the Pentagon has banned four journalists who best understand the tribunal process: While the judge in the case, Col. Patrick Parrish, issued an admonition yesterday for reporters to [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 10:26 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 11:57 am
[...] Washington Independent Tags: World Print Comment PDRTJS_settings_1029 = { "id" : "1029", "unique_id" : "wp-post-125115", "title" : "Canadian journalists banned from Gitmo", "permalink" : "http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/05/07/canadian-journalists-banned-from-gitmo/" }; Sharefunction fbs_click() {u=location.href;t=document.title;window.open('http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+encodeURIComponent(u)+'&t='+encodeURIComponent(t),'sharer','toolbar=0,status=0,width=626,height=436');return false;} [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 12:21 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:09 pm
[...] Spencer has more here. He also included the text of the letter sent to the reporters: Cc: Whitman, Bryan Mr OSD PA [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:12 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:56 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 2:02 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 2:05 pm
[...] Spencer Ackermann writes in the Washington Independent: Rosenberg is the single most diligent, consistent and experienced Guantanamo Bay reporter in the world, having carved out the Guantanamo beat steadily almost since the detention facility here opened in 2002 and traveled here more frequently than any other journalist. (I personally heard complaints about her from public affairs officers here five years ago — and those complaints amounted to whining about how dogged an investigator she was.) Koring and Edwards have also been invaluable resources about Khadr and Guantanamo to their colleagues these past two weeks. [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 2:13 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 1:44 pm
Considering the pool of info these reporters apparently represent, I can't help but wonder if this isn't a scheme to keep Gitmo reporting off-balance. An attempt to disrupt clear information coming out of there.
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 3:21 pm
[...] story stuck out to me, personally, because—as Spencer Ackerman commented at The Washington Independent—Ms. Rosenberg is the “single most diligent, consistent and experienced Guantanamo Bay [...]
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 3:39 pm
Yeah, kick those journalists out for publishing publicly available info about a subject you don't want talked about.
Guess it's only wrong when other countries do it…
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 9:02 pm
[...] Ackerman: [Carol] Rosenberg of the Miami Times is the single most diligent, consistent and experienced Guantanamo Bay reporter in the world, having carved out the Guantanamo beat steadily almost since the detention facility here opened in 2002 and traveled here more frequently than any other journalist. (I personally heard complaints about her from public affairs officers here five years ago — and those complaints amounted to whining about how dogged an investigator she was.) Koring and Edwards have also been invaluable resources about Khadr and Guantanamo to their colleagues these past two weeks. via andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 10:10 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 9:16 pm
It is time for news orgs. and the aforementioned reporters to gather and pool all their notes and knowledge? Perhaps write a book (novel?). Or if they are still too competitive, I hope their replacements are well-mentored by these folks.
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 11:08 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 7, 2010 @ 11:31 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 12:00 am
[...] Thursday, the Pentagon banned four reporters from further on-site reporting of military commission trials at Guantanamo, because they published [...]
Comment posted May 7, 2010 @ 11:52 pm
Considering the work that Rosenberg has been doing, that isn't out of the realm of possibility.
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 1:00 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 1:06 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 1:18 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 2:02 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 2:57 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 6:09 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 6:39 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists Frοm Guantanamo Bay fοr Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 11:54 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Comment posted May 8, 2010 @ 11:13 am
When interrogator #1 threatened to have Omar Khadr raped and murdered in prison in order to coerce a confession and was later court-martialed and sentenced to 5 months in prison for abuse of prisoners at Bagram Air Base, his identity became relevant! When the U.S. deliberately commits war crimes, the identity of the perpetrator also becomes relevant! When the U.S. Military tries to suppress the truth, by barring journalists, that fact also becomes relevant!
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 12:35 pm
[...] The fifth reporter is the Miami Herald’s Carol Rosenberg who has followed the Military Commissions for years and is practically a permanent fixture in GTMO. You can read the Pentagon’s letter by clicking on this link. [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 3:37 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 5:13 pm
[...] Bay. Their offense: reporting the name of a witness whose identity is under a protective order. Read the rest of this article at the Washington Independent. [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 9:36 pm
[...] Omar Khadr. The whole of his coverage is worth reading, but probably the most critical of them is this one: GUANTANAMO BAY — Two weeks’ worth of proceedings in the pre-trial hearing of Omar [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 9:48 pm
[...] Spencer Ackerman has been in Guantanamo for the past week, reporting on the pre-trial hearing of Omar Khadr. The whole of his coverage is worth reading, but probably the most critical of them is this one: [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 10:14 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 8, 2010 @ 10:30 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 4:51 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 9:26 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 9:26 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 11:40 am
[...] Omar Khadr. The whole of his coverage is worth reading, but probably the most critical of them is this one: GUANTANAMO BAY — Two weeks’ worth of proceedings in the pre-trial hearing of Omar [...]
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 3:17 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 4:02 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 9, 2010 @ 7:14 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 3:28 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 10, 2010 @ 6:10 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 11, 2010 @ 10:36 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 11, 2010 @ 7:43 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 13, 2010 @ 12:05 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 13, 2010 @ 10:03 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 14, 2010 @ 1:25 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 14, 2010 @ 2:38 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 16, 2010 @ 9:30 pm
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting … [...]
Pingback posted May 24, 2010 @ 9:51 am
[...] Pentagon Bans Four Journalists From Guantanamo Bay for Reporting Interrogator #1’s Name «… [...]
Pingback posted May 28, 2010 @ 1:50 pm
[...] to all of the Guantanamo detainees who are winning their habeas cases, is the same Carol Rosenberg whom the Obama DOD just banned from covering military commissions at Guantanamo. Maybe The New York Times can do a big story tomorrow on how press freedoms are being curtailed in [...]
Pingback posted May 29, 2010 @ 6:38 pm
[...] to all of the Guantanamo detainees who are winning their habeas cases, is the same Carol Rosenberg whom the Obama DOD just banned from covering military commissions at Guantanamo. Maybe The New York Times can do a big story tomorrow on how press freedoms are being curtailed [...]
Pingback posted June 1, 2010 @ 1:11 pm
[...] to all of the Guantanamo detainees who are winning their habeas cases, is the same Carol Rosenberg whom the Obama DOD just banned from covering military commissions at Guantanamo. Maybe The New York Times can do a big story tomorrow on how press freedoms are being [...]
Pingback posted June 1, 2010 @ 3:57 pm
[...] to all of the Guantanamo detainees who are winning their habeas cases, is the same Carol Rosenberg whom the Obama DOD just banned from covering military commissions at Guantanamo. Maybe The New York Times can do a big story tomorrow on how press freedoms are being curtailed in [...]
Pingback posted June 15, 2010 @ 5:57 pm
[...] Whitman, a principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for public affairs, has ruled to keep four of my colleagues banned from reporting from Guantanamo Bay. Their offense, as you may recall, was to report the publicly available name of an interrogator who [...]
Pingback posted July 10, 2010 @ 7:43 pm
[...] May, the Defense Department kicked four reporters out of Guantanamo Bay, where they were reporting on the military commission of Omar Khadr. The journalists were all [...]
Pingback posted August 11, 2010 @ 11:27 am
[...] — probably the single most knowledgeable and relentless journalist covering Guantanamo — was banned in May, along with three Canadian journalists, from attending any further proceedings, a ban that was then [...]
Pingback posted August 11, 2010 @ 1:31 pm
[...] probably the single most knowledgeable and relentless journalist covering Guantanamo — was banned in May, along with three Canadian journalists, from attending any further proceedings, a ban that was then [...]
Pingback posted August 11, 2010 @ 9:51 pm
[...] probably the single most knowledgeable and relentless journalist covering Guantanamo — was banned in May, along with three Canadian journalists, from attending any further proceedings, a ban that was then [...]
Pingback posted August 12, 2010 @ 3:02 am
[...] — probably the single most knowledgeable and relentless journalist covering Guantanamo — was banned in May, along with three Canadian journalists, from attending any further proceedings, a ban that was then [...]
Pingback posted August 13, 2010 @ 7:14 pm
[...] probably the single most knowledgeable and relentless journalist covering Guantanamo — was banned in May, along with three Canadian journalists, from attending any further proceedings, a ban that was then [...]
Comment posted September 29, 2010 @ 1:40 am
One of the more impressive blogs Ive seen. Thanks so much for keeping the internet classy for a change.
Pingback posted November 17, 2010 @ 11:34 pm
[...] shit in court. This leads to all sorts of lunacies, including telling people that something is classified even though it’s been widely (and internally) reported, asking lawyers to forget briefs they’ve written, and classifying objections to classifying. [...]
Comment posted November 26, 2010 @ 6:50 am
gucci sungalsses
gucci eyeglasses
gucci wallet
gucci purses
gucci scarves
gucci tie
gucci hat
gucci jewelry
gucci watches
gucci messenger bag
2
armani
cheap armani
wholesale armani
discount armani
armani on sale
armani online
armani outlet
armani men
armani women
armani store
armani sale
Comment posted November 26, 2010 @ 6:50 am
Kanye West is practically nothing if not really a showman, and on Tuesday, the rapper celebrated the discharge of his fifth studio album, My fabulous dim Twisted Fantasy, creating a efficiency that was as daring and dashing since it experienced been fraught with traces belonging to the petulant MC belonging to the past.Chanel Bikini
Shortly soon after midnight, West took to the stage in the Bowery Ballroom in Manhattan accompanied by Bon Iver’s Justin Vernon and femcee/singer Teyana Taylor.Chanel Shirt
The trio released into “Dark Fantasy,” the spirited opening quantity of ‘Ye’s new set.
Sporting a skin-tight dress, Taylor admirably belted out the chorus to the check and stuck near to to ride shotgun using the G.O.O.D audio tracks chief.
“New York City, make some noise,” West informed the gathering crowd soon after the opening selections. “Today, I’m gonna do My fabulous dim Twisted Fantasy.”
From there, West breezed by method of “Gorgeous,” “Power” and “All belonging to the Lights,” the latter of which was a rumbling effort.
Nicki Minaj joined Yeezy on stage for some album-release unity once the DJ spun “Monster,” sans Jay-Z.Chanel T Shirt
Pingback posted December 11, 2010 @ 4:49 am
[...] probably the single most knowledgeable and relentless journalist covering Guantanamo — was banned in May, along with three Canadian journalists, from attending any further proceedings, a ban that was then [...]
Pingback posted January 7, 2011 @ 7:07 pm
[...] to all of the Guantanamo detainees who are winning their habeas cases, is the same Carol Rosenberg whom the Obama DOD just banned from covering military commissions at Guantanamo. Maybe The New York Times can do a big story tomorrow on how press freedoms are being [...]
Comment posted March 30, 2011 @ 1:54 am
take advantage of the starving masses to build multimillion dollar empires, hunt endangered animals for fun.
Comment posted April 20, 2011 @ 5:25 am
lots of folks can’t be bothered to follow links, but it is wise to do so before criticizing.
Pingback posted May 21, 2011 @ 10:24 am
[...] probably the single most knowledgeable and relentless journalist covering Guantanamo — was banned in May, along with three Canadian journalists, from attending any further proceedings, a ban that was then [...]
Comment posted May 24, 2011 @ 3:43 am
every stage. We know that most of the players to conquer tSubaru jerseys clothinghe Mount Etna pink jersey in here. If Contador this continues, it will be hard to beat him. “responsibility is on the shoulders of Contador now has two weeks to go. “He has a good cycling jerseysteam”, Nibali and told Processo Allah
while ensuring public safety officials and the consulting bmc team clothingteam, the Amgen Tour of California 2011, organizers announced that the current and expected weather conditions allow, on the first stage of the game started at 1:15 in the afternoon Pacific South Lake Tahoe in the original starting line. Race officials will continue to monitor and supervise bicycle jerseys men the process and all other conditions. If it is determined to be shimano cycling shortsunsafe to any continuation of the time, the game will be the collapse of the Califonria Amgen Tour organizers discount cycling bibsannounced this morning that they will be shortened from 191 scott cycling shortskm to about cannondale bike jerseys80 km first stage of the delay of several hours, and pushed to the stage after 1:15 pmcinelli usa on South Lake Tahoe seconds. They match the drivers, the risk of snow in the cold team cervelo clothingnight, under the conditions of security decisions based on the combination. AEG cinelli for saleSports president Andrew Massey company told Cyclingnews the morningsantini cycling jerseys wind chill grams is 10 degrees Fahrenheit, and “too cold, the players participate in the competition.” He santini cyclingalso noted that if the conditions had not improved at noon, the race will start on Monday at Squaw Valley, this csc cyclingis the colnago jerseysbeginning of the two original phases.
Comment posted May 24, 2011 @ 3:43 am
every stage. We know that most of the players to conquer tSubaru jerseys clothinghe Mount Etna pink jersey in here. If Contador this continues, it will be hard to beat him. “responsibility is on the shoulders of Contador now has two weeks to go. “He has a good cycling jerseysteam”, Nibali and told Processo Allah
while ensuring public safety officials and the consulting bmc team clothingteam, the Amgen Tour of California 2011, organizers announced that the current and expected weather conditions allow, on the first stage of the game started at 1:15 in the afternoon Pacific South Lake Tahoe in the original starting line. Race officials will continue to monitor and supervise bicycle jerseys men the process and all other conditions. If it is determined to be shimano cycling shortsunsafe to any continuation of the time, the game will be the collapse of the Califonria Amgen Tour organizers discount cycling bibsannounced this morning that they will be shortened from 191 scott cycling shortskm to about cannondale bike jerseys80 km first stage of the delay of several hours, and pushed to the stage after 1:15 pmcinelli usa on South Lake Tahoe seconds. They match the drivers, the risk of snow in the cold team cervelo clothingnight, under the conditions of security decisions based on the combination. AEG cinelli for saleSports president Andrew Massey company told Cyclingnews the morningsantini cycling jerseys wind chill grams is 10 degrees Fahrenheit, and “too cold, the players participate in the competition.” He santini cyclingalso noted that if the conditions had not improved at noon, the race will start on Monday at Squaw Valley, this csc cyclingis the colnago jerseysbeginning of the two original phases.
Trackback posted August 23, 2011 @ 3:52 pm
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Trackback posted August 23, 2011 @ 3:56 pm
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Trackback posted August 23, 2011 @ 6:22 pm
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Trackback posted August 24, 2011 @ 5:10 am
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Trackback posted August 24, 2011 @ 1:12 pm
Sources…
[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 1:54 am
Sources…
[...]check below, are some totally unrelated websites to ours, however, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[...]……
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 8:02 am
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 9:33 am
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Trackback posted August 25, 2011 @ 11:07 am
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 2:29 am
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 5:21 am
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 6:22 am
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 8:54 am
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 9:24 am
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 10:09 am
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 11:33 am
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
Trackback posted August 26, 2011 @ 2:15 pm
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Trackback posted August 27, 2011 @ 2:51 am
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Trackback posted August 27, 2011 @ 7:08 am
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted August 27, 2011 @ 8:47 am
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Trackback posted August 27, 2011 @ 12:18 pm
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Trackback posted August 27, 2011 @ 12:45 pm
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Trackback posted August 27, 2011 @ 3:20 pm
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Trackback posted August 28, 2011 @ 12:03 am
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Trackback posted August 28, 2011 @ 3:46 am
Online Article……
[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]……
Trackback posted August 28, 2011 @ 4:30 am
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted August 28, 2011 @ 9:04 am
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 9:58 am
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 11:55 am
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Trackback posted August 29, 2011 @ 11:48 pm
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Trackback posted August 30, 2011 @ 12:32 am
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted August 30, 2011 @ 1:25 am
Websites we think you should visit…
[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……
Trackback posted August 30, 2011 @ 3:31 am
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Trackback posted August 30, 2011 @ 4:12 am
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Trackback posted August 30, 2011 @ 10:45 pm
Websites we think you should visit…
[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……
Trackback posted August 30, 2011 @ 11:48 pm
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 12:07 am
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 12:38 am
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 1:23 am
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 2:37 am
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 3:01 am
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 4:33 am
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 8:33 am
Cool sites…
[...]we came across a cool site that you might enjoy. Take a look if you want[...]……
Trackback posted August 31, 2011 @ 9:36 am
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Trackback posted September 1, 2011 @ 5:15 am
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
Trackback posted September 1, 2011 @ 8:30 am
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Trackback posted September 1, 2011 @ 9:41 am
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Trackback posted September 1, 2011 @ 10:53 am
Sites we Like……
[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]……
Trackback posted September 1, 2011 @ 11:58 pm
Links…
[...]Sites of interest we have a link to[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 7:18 am
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 7:26 am
Superb website…
[...]always a big fan of linking to bloggers that I love but don’t get a lot of link love from[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 9:04 am
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 9:37 am
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 9:45 am
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 10:40 am
Websites you should visit…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 10:48 am
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 12:01 pm
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
Trackback posted September 2, 2011 @ 12:10 pm
Read was interesting, stay in touch……
[...]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[...]……
Trackback posted September 3, 2011 @ 6:28 am
Awesome website…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]……
Trackback posted September 3, 2011 @ 7:33 am
Related……
[...]just beneath, are numerous totally not related sites to ours, however, they are surely worth going over[...]……
Trackback posted September 4, 2011 @ 1:15 am
They never check credit scores, so you don’t even have to worry about this being an issue in any way…
[...]The internet has without question made life easier for all human beings, especially with the presence of online payday lenders[...]…
Trackback posted September 6, 2011 @ 1:26 am
Gems form the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted September 6, 2011 @ 1:59 am
Great website…
[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……
Trackback posted September 6, 2011 @ 3:00 am
You should check this out…
[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]……
Trackback posted September 6, 2011 @ 7:16 am
Recent Blogroll Additions……
[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……
Trackback posted September 7, 2011 @ 6:59 am
Websites worth visiting…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]……
Trackback posted September 7, 2011 @ 12:49 pm
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
