Is The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990x CPU Mining Hashrate Enough For Mining?
Someone from the realm of workstation users has emerged as a full-time Raptoreum miner. Recently, a new Raptoreum pool in Southeast Asia called AoiPool added a new AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X CPU worker member, and the Ryzen Threadripper 3990x CPU mining hashrate results after a 24-hour average workday appear incredibly good. Only one Threadripper 3990X 64-core beast is capable of mining Raptoreum at a whopping 11.6 KH/s.
The most intriguing aspect is that the steady average hashrate performance of a single chip stunned other users for a time. The graph below demonstrates how the Threadripper 3990X's monstrous 256MB of L3 cache annihilates any Intel CPU in terms of mining performance.
At the moment, this Raptoreum mining pool only supports stratum connections from Singaporean and Taiwanese servers, giving Asian miners an advantage in terms of acquiring more raptoreum within the pool's tiny size. It appears as though this Threadripper user customized the mining parameters in the TRX40 motherboard's BIOS. The majority of Raptoreum miners employ Ryzen 9 5900X processors with a core voltage of 1.0 v and a clock speed of 3.6-3.9 GHz.
- CPU Cores: 64
- Threads: 128
- Max. Boost Clock: Up to 4.3GHz
- Base Clock: 2.9GHz
- Total L1 Cache: 4MB
- Total L2 Cache: 32MB
- Total L3 Cache: 256MB
- Default TDP: 280W
- Processor Technology for CPU Cores: TSMC 7nm FinFET
- Unlocked for Overclocking: Yes
- CPU Sockets: TRX4
- Thermal Solution (PIB): Cooler Not Included, Liquid Cooling Recommended
- Max. Operating Temperature (Tjmax): 95Â°C
- PCI ExpressÂ® Version: PCIe 4.0
- System Memory Type: DDR4
- Memory Channels: 4
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Processor Mining Hashrate For Every Algorithm (Power Consumption 280 Watts/Hour)
- RandomXmonero Mining Hashrate: 53 kH/s
If 32 cores and 64 threads are insufficient for you, AMD now offers a desktop processor with 64 cores and 128 threads. Yes, this is a traditional desktop CPU, not a server product, although the lines between the two are becoming increasingly blurred. because the RRP of $3,990 also refers to a server, not a personal computer.
In essence, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a workstation processor. The enormous heat spreader conceals nine chips: eight 74 mm2 mini chips each with eight processing cores (the "chips") and a 416 mm2 large I/O die. The latter is the primary distinction from Epyc server processors; because this is castrated, the memory interface is reduced to 50%, just as the PCIe 4.0 lanes are reduced to 50%. As a result, an exceptionally powerful processor with quad-channel RAM and 64 PCIe lanes remains.
The rumors of a W/TRX80 chipset enabled by octa-channel RAM are buried beneath the final presentation of all critical data on the CPU, as the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X also uses the socket previously used by Threadripper 3000 in conjunction with the TRX40 chipset, enabling quad-channel RAM and a maximum of 64 PCIe lanes per Standard 4.0.
Is this a workstation processor or a desktop processor? True and false. AMD frequently referred to him as that, but he began with the PC portfolio and so clearly separated himself from the server space.
AMD's 64-core Threadripper 3000 is likewise covered by the Threadripper 3000 corset. This essentially means that no changes are made to the frame settings. Above all, the TDP increases from a maximum of 280 watts, affecting the clock. This decreases dramatically when compared to the 32-core, but is ultimately due to physics, as TDP typically corresponds almost directly to consumption with AMD, and the fact that eight chips with 64 cores at the same clock rate require more energy than four chips with 32 cores is self-evident. They must be timed down in order to eat the same quantity. In contrast, the Threadripper 3000 and its predecessor,
While 4,000 euros isn't cheap, there was and still isn't a direct equivalent product for such a CPU on the market.AMD is thus addressing a small segment of the market that requires more processing power than a 32-core processor can provide. However, the firm emphasizes that clients should be mindful of their hardware requirements. Because if the projects are demanding but small, the 32-core model may pay off more than the 64-core model. This is for specialists who are responsible for long-term initiatives that need the usage of a workstation or even a server. Although the term "workstation" appeared on nearly every presentation slide during the two-week pre-launch press briefing, the product is still officially advertised as a high-end desktop (HEDT).
And what about the alternative? It's not an Intel product, but an AMD product, and only as a server CPU. At least $4,425 for the Epyc 7702P's 64 cores, the Epyc 7702P, the second generation Epyc for servers, costs at least $4,425.Due to the CPU's reduced TDP of 80 watts, AMD guarantees a base frequency of just 2.0 GHz, with a maximum single-core turbo clock of 3.35 GHz. CPUs provide an octa-channel memory interface and 128 PCIe lanes by default.