Citizen journalism is centered on public individuals "taking an active role in the process of gathering, reporting, evaluating, and distributing news and information." It is also known as collaborative media, participatory journalism, democratic journalism, guerilla journalism, or street journalism. Similarly, Courtney C.
Radsch defines "citizen journalism" as "an alternative and activist form of news gathering and reporting that operates outside mainstream media institutions, often as a response to shortcomings in the professional journalistic field, that employs similar journalistic practices but is motivated by different goals and ideals, and relies on alternative sources of legitimacy than traditional or mainstream journalism." When the individuals formerly known as the audience use the press instruments they have in their control to enlighten one another, writes Jay Rosen.
According to the core idea of citizen journalism, ordinary people, not professional journalists, may be the primary makers and distributors of news. Citizen journalism should not be confused with community journalism or civic journalism, which are both done by professional journalists; collaborative journalism, which is done by professional and non-professional journalists working together; or social journalism, which is a hybrid of professional and non-professional journalism.
Screenshot of QuodVerum Forum account creation interface
Quodverum is a Latin word, which translates “what is true” in English. Quodverum is a kind of social media platform. In the American spirit, it is an open forum aimed at fostering the freest possible interchange of ideas. Every kind of idea and opinion is allowed and a slight moderation is made only if needed. The people from all around, who are bored from the other social media platforms like, Facebook and Twitter gather around and discuss everything from politics to movies.
Unlike other social media platforms, it is not a single site, rather it is an organized network of hundreds of thousands of communities of multiple organizations and the people, that provides a smooth experience. The use of this medium is not only free but your personal information is also kept safe and not used for any advertising objectives. There is zero advertising on the platform. The website accepts donations from the users to make it run. It has a user base of 33,703 users to date.
The folks behind it do not find words or ideas offensive and feel that portraying words as violence is a form of violence against words in and of itself. However, they feel compelled to establish a few limits in order to maintain civility, and these have to do with the sometimes subtle but generally discernible line between words and action. Specifically, calls for violence of any kind, the overthrow of the US government, promotion of bigotry or hatred against ANY group of individuals, or illegal activity are all immediately removed from this forum. The spread of terrorist ideology is also not permitted. People, not algorithms, manage reports of such incidents, and they are assessed in context. Attempts to fraudulently report stories out of context result in the accuser's firing.
Gab.com is one of the main competitors of quodverum.com.
Here is the list of its top alternatives
The API ecosystem of Quodverum is developer-friendly which is the reason that with the web version, Quodverum also has apps for all platforms like IOS, Android, and other platforms, which you can download free of cost from your respective app store. So the users can always remain in touch with the news and friends.
Here are some features of the app
- It is user-friendly and easy to use.
- Like its web version, It has no intrusive ads.
- All the information about the user is kept safe and not used for any commercial purpose.
- It is available on all platforms, so whatever the platform you use, you always have access.
Because citizen journalism or quodverum lacks a conceptual structure and guiding principles, it can be very opinionated and subjective, serving as a supplement rather than a major source of public opinion formation. Professional journalists and news organizations, among others, have criticized citizen journalism as uncontrolled, amateurish, and haphazard in terms of quality and coverage. Citizen journalists are also regarded as lacking in resources and emphasis on how to best serve the public owing to their lack of professional affiliation.