• News
    • Archive
  • Celebrities
  • Finance
  • Crypto
  • Entertainment
  • Travel
  • Health
  • Others

Argument against the Chinese Room Argument

750Shares
750.4KViews

In John Searle's Chinese room argument, he attempts to prove that it is impossible for a symbol-manipulator to be capable of thought. However, his argument is flawed and actually aids in the argument for the symbol system hypothesis. I will show that even the symbol-manipulator in his extreme example is capable of thought, although it still would be inferior to the human brain.

In John Searle's argument, an operator sits in an isolated room with rule books, an input slot, and an output slot. He performs various binary operations, manipulating the symbols given to him, and delivers the result of his operations through the output slot. John Searle states that the operator is unaware of the purpose of the program that he is performing and that the system cannot understand Chinese because the operator doesn't understand Chinese. Of course, the operator cannot understand Chinese, and neither can the books of rules. However, it is my argument that greater intelligence is formed that the operator need not be aware of and that it is a mistake for Searle to assume that the system is limited to the operator. When the operator starts manipulating symbols as per the instructions in his manuals, he creates a larger system. An intangible intelligence that does understand Chinese is formed and can understand and think as a human does.

To illustrate this in another way, consider the human brain, it consists of many individual neurons. With this biological collection of neurons that form the human brain we can mentate. Now imagine that every human in the world is given a small cubicle and mail-tubes for input and output. It is every human's responsibility to perform the job of a neuron, and with reference to a manual (based on physics and chemistry) they take input, and send output to other 'neurons' through their mail-tubes. This would perform to mirror the chemical reactions that occur in neurons as they receive input, and 'fire' output depending on the input received. In this way, the human population would act as a group mind. An individual would not necessarily know what the group mind is thinking, yet the group mind would be thinking. If we follow Searle's logic, we would have to conclude that since our neurons do not understand English, we cannot really understand English. This is false, and simply points out the error in Searle's argument. In the Chinese room argument, John Searle has simplified my example by using only one human, a more complicated manual, and lots of paper. However, even with one participant, the greater 'group-mind' does exist outside its constituent parts.

This contradicts John Searle's position that merely manipulating symbols will not enable the device to understand or think. He is incorrect because he assumes that the 'device' in question only encompasses the operator who performs the program. If one realizes that the 'device' is greater than the sum of its parts (even if it only has one operator), one can see that the device does actually have the potential for thought.

Although I believe that the system portrayed in John Searle's "Chinese room" is capable of understanding and thinking, I realize that it is severely crippled compared to a human intelligence. A human can think, and understand, but there are several areas in which humans would obviously be superior to the "Chinese room" system. One of the advantages of our brain is that it can store information for later use. We might say, remember that Frank hates donuts, and when we are told later that he is eating donuts, we could be surprised. Or we could be curious as to why he might have changed his feelings about donuts. In Searle's example, there is no mention as to whether or not the operator, Joe Soap, keeps information from past input somewhere in his journals, and so I assume that he does not. If the rules were changed to allow for computation of output based on current and previous input, the system could solve this problem.

COPYRIGHT_WI: Published on https://washingtonindependent.com/argument-against-the-chinese-room-argument/ by Jaya Mckeown on 2010-07-19T10:22:00.000Z

Another advantage that the human brain offers is the ability to learn. Joe Soap's rule books are static, and therefore all incoming input would be treated the same way. To overcome this problem, either the rule books would be editable, or the memory which I previously discussed would be able to store information about how to deal with input. In order to continue my neuron-cubicle illustration, I would keep the rule books static (as the physical laws are), but allow information to be stored in memory that allows for different algorithms to be implemented using the static library of rules in the manual (a kind of basic logic).

Clearly the system described by John Searle is capable of thought, but it is also obvious that alterations have to be made to allow the system to realize the abilities of the human brain.

Share: Twitter | Facebook | Linkedin

About The Authors

Jaya Mckeown

Jaya Mckeown - Jaya moved to Boston from New York to pursue a master's degree in corporate communications at Emerson College. This experience, combined with her undergraduate degree in psychology and teaching, has equipped her with valuable skills that she employs on a daily basis in real estate negotiations, homebuyer and seller education, and successful promotion of the team's listings. Jaya's clients often characterize her as meticulous, proactive, and enjoyable to be around.

Recent Articles

  • Myanmar's Junta Hinders Humanitarian Access After Cyclone Mocha Devastates Rakhine State

    News

    Myanmar's Junta Hinders Humanitarian Access After Cyclone Mocha Devastates Rakhine State

    Myanmar's Junta hinders humanitarian access after Cyclone Mocha devastates Rakhine state. Cyclone Mocha, one of the strongest storms to hit the country, has caused widespread devastation, resulting in casualties and leaving thousands of people in urgent need of assistance.

  • Best PS3 Headset Under 50 - Affordable Gaming Delight

    Reviews

    Best PS3 Headset Under 50 - Affordable Gaming Delight

    When it comes to finding the best PS3 headset under 50 dollars, there are several options available that offer decent audio quality, comfort, and affordability. While they may not have all the bells and whistles of high-end headsets, these budget-friendly options can still provide an enjoyable gaming experience.

  • Best PS3 Bluetooth Headset - Enjoy High-Quality Audio In Gaming

    Reviews

    Best PS3 Bluetooth Headset - Enjoy High-Quality Audio In Gaming

    When it comes to finding the best PS3 Bluetooth headset, there are several options available that offer excellent audio quality, comfort, and compatibility with the PlayStation 3 console. A Bluetooth headset is a popular choice for gamers as it provides wireless connectivity and allows for clear communication during multiplayer gaming sessions. In this article, we will explore some of the top choices for the best PS3 Bluetooth headset.

  • 4 Player Cocktail Arcade - Game On With Friends And Family

    Reviews

    4 Player Cocktail Arcade - Game On With Friends And Family

    A 4 player cocktail arcade is a gaming machine designed to accommodate up to four players simultaneously in a classic arcade-style format. These arcade machines typically feature a flat tabletop design with controls and a screen embedded within the surface, allowing players to gather around and enjoy multiplayer gaming experiences.

  • Arctis 5 Microphone - Guide To Its Features And Functionality

    Reviews

    Arctis 5 Microphone - Guide To Its Features And Functionality

    The Arctis 5 microphone is renowned for its impressive audio quality and comfort, but one of its standout features is its high-performance. Designed to deliver crystal-clear voice communication, the Arctis 5 microphone enhances your gaming and communication experience.

  • How Old Is Henry Cavill, His Early Life, Career, And Achievements

    Celebrities

    How Old Is Henry Cavill, His Early Life, Career, And Achievements

    Henry Cavill is a British actor widely recognized for his roles in popular films and television series. His career continues to flourish, and he remains a beloved figure in the entertainment industry. Being a famous celebrity, many people want to know how old is Henry Cavill, his early life, career, and achievements.

  • Chris Hemsworth - From Australia To Hollywood's Leading Man

    Celebrities

    Chris Hemsworth - From Australia To Hollywood's Leading Man

    Chris Hemsworth is a prominent Australian actor known for his portrayal of Thor in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Born in Melbourne in 1983, Hemsworth began his acting career on Australian television before making his way to Hollywood.

  • LoL Item Sets Generator - The Impact Of Patch Updates

    Technology

    LoL Item Sets Generator - The Impact Of Patch Updates

    If you are tired of manually selecting items for your favorite League of Legends (LoL) champions every time you play a game, you're in luck because the LoL item sets generator is here to save your time and energy.

  • Anon Imageboard - A Deep Dive Into Online Culture

    Technology

    Anon Imageboard - A Deep Dive Into Online Culture

    Anon imageboard, also known as anonymous imageboard, is a type of online forum where users can post and share content anonymously. This forum has become increasingly popular over the past decade, particularly among young people and those with alternative views. Continue reading to explore it in detail.

  • Dnvod CN - Its Rise In China's Online Video Streaming Market

  • How Old Is Faze Sway And His Accomplishments

  • Where Is CJ So Cool From And What Is His Date Of Birth?

  • Inquisitormaster Boyfriend - Also Known As Alex Teran

  • Scenic Road Trips Through New England - The Ultimate Fall Foliage Tour