A relatively obscure document released by the Federal Election Commission on Wednesday bodes particularly ill for the chances of any form of meaningful campaign
A relatively obscure document released by the Federal Election Commission on Wednesday bodes particularly ill for the chances of any form of meaningful campaign finance disclosure from independent groups during the upcoming election cycle.
The document in question is a “Statement of Reasons” released by the FEC’s three Republican commissioners. It covers a 2008 advertisement, entitled “Family Taxes,” from Freedom Watch Inc., a 501(c)(4). Freedom Watch did not disclose any donor information for the ad. After the ad aired, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) filed a complaint: Freedom Watch Inc. had violated FEC disclosure rules by failing to identify the donors who made the political ad possible, it argued.
But in the Statement of Reasons, the commissioners argue the group didn’t violate relevant FEC rules that require donor disclosure for electioneering communications. The case hinges on the phrase “for the purpose of furthering electioneering communications.” According to current FEC rules, only funds donated for this express purpose must be disclosed.
Back in 2008, Freedom Watch fired back that it ”did not solicit any donations for the purpose of airing an electioneering communication in Louisiana or elsewhere” and that “[a]ll funds contributed to [Freedom's Watch] during 2008 have been for general purposes.”
How one interprets the above clause is up for debate. If an organization’s primary goal is to air electioneering communications, it might stand to reason that donations to that organization were made for that purpose. But the Republican FEC commissioners’ reply makes it clear that they are determined to interpret the rule as narrowly as possible:
The complaint in this matter points to no specific facts that demonstrate that Freedom’s Watch financed the “Family Taxes” advertisement in whole or in part with funds donated for the purpose of furthering that particular advertisement (or for that matter, for the purpose of furthering the group’s electioneering communications in general). Instead, the complaint points to a New York Times article that, on the basis of anonymous sources, reported that Sheldon Adelson was the primary financier of Freedom’s Watch, and that Mr. Adelson “insisted on parceling out his money project by project” and has “rejected almost all of the staffs proposals that have been brought to him.” The Complainant believes this is enough for the Commission to find reason to believe that Freedom’s Watch violated the Act’s electioneering communications reporting provisions and to initiate an investigation.
It’s worth nothing that the New York Times article they reference was a thorough work of investigating reporting. But the commissioners brush it aside, interpreting the law only in a very narrow context and leaving myriad ways to avoid its disclosure requirements. Because the FEC has six commissioners — and three of them signed their names to this document — don’t expect it to take meaningful action against any political nonprofit groups who choose not to reveal their donors for electioneering communications during this election cycle, either.
Giffords shooting leads nation to introspection and political finger wagging
In the wake of the shooting in Arizona this weekend that critically injured Rep.
EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management
At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from
E-Verify Mandate Begins Today
The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm
EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules
The EPA seal (Pic via sentryjournal.com) The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.
EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.
EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’
In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work
EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria
The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards
EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’
All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of
EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards
Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some