The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent

House Passes Historic Health Care Reform

Last updated: 07/31/2020 08:00 | 03/22/2010 07:19
Adan Duran

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), carrying the gavel used to pass Medicare in 1965, and members of the House Democratic Caucus on Sunday (EPA/ House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), carrying the gavel used to pass Medicare in 1965, and members of the House Democratic Caucus on Sunday (EPA/

With the last-minute support of anti-abortion colleagues, House Democrats on Sunday passed historic legislation to extend health coverage to tens of millions of uninsured Americans, protect patients from the most flagrant abuses of insurance companies, and curb runaway health care costs. All told, the $940 billion reforms represent the most sweeping overhaul of the nation’s health care system since the creation of Medicare more than four decades ago.

[Congress1]The tally was 219 to 212 in support of reforms passed by the Senate on Christmas Eve, with 34 Democrats joining every Republican in the lower chamber in opposition to the measure. An accompanying reconciliation proposal — which tweaks the Senate bill to address what House leaders considered to be inherent weaknesses — also passed, 220 to 211.

Democratic leaders were quick to place the reforms among the most significant in the nation’s history — legislation on par with that establishing Social Security, Medicare and new civil rights protections. “This is an American proposal that honors the traditions of our country,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said just before the votes. “We may not have chosen the time, but the time has chosen us.”

The Senate bill now moves to the White House, where President Obama will sign it shortly into law. The separate reconciliation bill then goes to the Senate, where Democrats are hoping to pass it before the Easter recess, which begins Friday. Reconciliation rules prevent upper-chamber Republicans from filibustering the proposal, meaning that Democrats need just 51 votes — not 60 — to pass it.

For House leaders, the victory didn’t come easy. Sunday’s vote capped a tension-filled week in which some Democrats who’d previously supported health care reform announced their opposition; others who’d formerly opposed reform announced their support; and party leaders were left with the delicate task of counting heads to ensure they had the numbers to pass the bill.

Quite aside from the unified GOP opposition, anti-abortion Democrats, led by Michigan Rep. Bart Stupak, had vowed to oppose the bill over language they feared would allow federal funds to subsidize abortion services — something that’s been prohibited for more than 30 years. And they had the numbers to kill the proposal. Breaking the impasse required the muscle of the White House, which stepped in Sunday to issue an eleventh-hour executive order stipulating that nothing in the reform bill would dilute the decades-old prohibition on the federal funding of abortion. The move — while blasted by abortion rights groups — caused the abortion opponents to throw their support behind the proposals.

“The real winner,” Stupak said Sunday at a press conference announcing the deal, “is really the American people.”

The rare weekend vote came after more than a year of rancorous debate over how Congress should approach health care reform. The saga first pitted Democrats against Republicans, but later — when it became clear that no Republicans would support the bill — saw liberal Democrats and their moderate colleagues doing battle over the most contentious provisions of the enormous bill. In the end, party leaders, behind Pelosi, convinced enough Democratic critics — both liberal and conservative — that the proposals would at least take steps toward fixing a health care system that all sides agree has grown dysfunctional.

“This is not the bill I wanted to support,” Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), the liberal single-payer supporter, said recently in announcing his reluctant support for the bill. “Hopefully” he added, it will take the country “in the direction of comprehensive health care reform.”

At the center of the reforms are a series of provisions reining in the most controversial practices of the health insurance industry. Under the reforms, for example, insurance companies could no longer deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. They could no longer drop coverage when a patient gets sick. They could no longer hike premiums indiscriminately. And they could no longer put caps — either annual or lifetime — on coverage benefits.

Among the other major provisions, the reform bills will:

  • Increase Medicaid coverage to most folks living below 133 percent of the federal poverty level ($29,327 for a family of four), while providing sliding-scale federal subsidies to  those living below 400 percent of poverty ($88,200 for a family of four).
  • Require most Americans to buy health insurance or face financial penalties.
  • Take incremental steps to close the coverage gap in Medicare’s prescription drug benefit — the so-called doughnut hole — by 2020.
  • Hike Medicaid rates on primary care services to equal those of Medicare.
  • Extend funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program through 2015.

To fund the changes, the proposals will:

  • Cut more than $500 billion from the Medicare program, largely targeting the private insurance plans that receive huge subsidies to cover Medicare patients.
  • Apply a 0.5 percent hike on Medicare’s payroll tax for individuals earning more than $200,000 and families earning more than $250,000.
  • Tax the most expensive insurance plans, those costing more than $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for family plans. (That tax will take effect in 2018.)

The Congressional Budget Office, which has estimated that the bill will expand coverage to roughly 32 million uninsured Americans, said Saturday that the changes will reduce federal deficits by $143 billion over the next decade, and by roughly $1 trillion in the 10 years to follow. The analysis at once convinced some Democratic budget hawks to support the bill, and took the wind from the sails of Republican critics who have said the reforms will bankrupt the nation.

Not that it prevented GOP leaders from attacking the reforms to the last. Rep. Marsha Balackburn (Tenn.), the first Republican to speak on the floor Sunday, set the tone early, blasting the Democrats for reforms that Republicans say will steal patient choice.

“Only they see the death of freedom … as a cause for celebration,” Blackburn said. “It is their children who will pay for their greed.”

Rep. Nathan Deal, the senior Republican on the Ways and Means health subpanel and candidate to become Georgia’s governor, echoed those criticisms. He vowed that, if elected to the governor’s office, he’ll focus on nullifying the reforms, particularly the Medicaid expansion, which many Republicans have called an unconstitutional mandate on states.

“The problem with socialism,” Deal said Sunday, “is that you ultimately run out of other people’s money.”

But in the end, Republicans — while effective in slowing the pace of the legislation — were helpless to prevent its passage.

The historic nature of the vote was not lost on Democratic leaders. Pelosi, who presided over the final vote, waved the same gavel that was used when Medicare passed the lower chamber more than six decades ago. And Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), the head of the Rules Committee who managed part of the day’s debate, was brandishing her own copy of a 1939 letter to Congress from Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a letter urging lawmakers to include a national health care system as part of the Social Security program.

“Good health,” FDR had written, “is essential to the security and progress of the Nation.”

Seventy-one years later, Democrats are hoping he was right.

Adan Duran | Adan is a high-energy keynote speaker who encourages audiences to use their focus to pay attention to what matters most at work and in life. His audience members adore his realistic techniques that they can use in their personal and professional lives. As a professional speaker, he has won several awards. His extensive experience in learning, growth, and leading large corporate teams makes his an ideal candidate. Employers recruit Adan because of his actionable techniques for avoiding disruptions, stopping interruptions, prioritizing everyday objectives, and saying no to demands that divert resources away from actual goals and priorities.


E-Verify Mandate Begins Today

The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm

EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management

At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from

EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules

The EPA seal (Pic via The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.

EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann  has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.

EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’

In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work

EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’

All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of

EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria

The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards

EPA biologist says fracking may be partly to blame for West Virginia fish kill

New documents obtained by an environmental news service show that an EPA analyst believes that wastewater from fracking may be partly responsible for a fish kill in a West Virginia river. Scientific American reports : U.S

EPA: BP Has 24 Hours to Find a Less Toxic Chemical Dispersant

Thought the massive quantities of oil pouring into the Gulf of Mexico were the only major threat to the country’s southeast coastal waters right now? Think

EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards

Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy |