The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent

Four Weeks Later, Senate Unanimously Passes Bill Extending Unemployment Benefits

Twenty-seven days, four votes and a long lesson in tedium later, the upper chamber has passed legislation extending unemployment benefits by at least 14 weeks

Tyreece Bauer
Last updated: Jul 31, 2020 | Nov 05, 2009

Twenty-seven days, four votes and a long lesson in tedium later, the upper chamber has passed legislation extending unemployment benefits by at least 14 weeks in every state. The final tally was 98-0.

Similar legislation passed the House more than six weeks ago, but the bill has been held up in the Senate as party leaders did battle over a series of controversial GOP amendments. The final bill included only two amendments: a provision extending a popular tax credit for homebuyers, and another allowing businesses to recoup taxes they paid in recent years.

The bill now moves to the House, which will vote on it Thursday. Afterward, the proposal will travel to the White House for the president’s signature, which will make it law.

The benefits are not retroactive, so those whose checks stopped coming before the bill’s enactment shouldn’t hold their breath for back-pay. It’s not coming. But those folks will be eligible for at least 14 weeks of benefits moving forward. In states where unemployment rates are higher than 8.5 percent, the new benefits will run for 20 weeks.

For anyone wishing to relive the entire tedious saga, a brief(ish) chronology goes like this:

  • Sept. 22: The House passes its version of the unemployment bill, which would extend benefits for 13 weeks, but only in those states where jobless rates top 8.5 percent.

  • Oct. 8: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) asks for unanimous consent to pass the Senate’s amended version of the House bill. Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) objects, citing the absence of a cost estimate.

  • Oct. 13: Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) asks for consent to pass the bill. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) objects.

  • Oct. 21: Reid files cloture on a vote to proceed to the bill.

  • Oct. 26: Reid asks for GOP consent to pass the bill. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) objects.

  • Oct. 27: The Senate votes to proceed to the bill by a tally of 87 to 13.

  • Oct. 29: Reid asks for consent to pass the bill. McConnell objects.

  • Oct. 29: Reid files two sequential cloture motions — one on the Senate substitute bill and one on the underlying House bill.

  • Nov. 2: The Senate hops the first cloture hurdle by a count of 85 to 2. The 30-hour clock before the next cloture vote begins ticking.

  • Nov. 4: The Senate hops the second cloture hurdle by a count of 97 to 1. By a previous agreement, the 30-hour clock before the final vote had begun ticking about 12 hours before.

  • Nov. 4: A deal is struck between Reid and McConnell to disregard the remainder of the 30-hour post-cloture clock, leading to the staging of the final vote.

Tyreece Bauer | Analyst and photographer in the field of technology. When I'm not working on my laptop, I like to go surfing, hiking with friends, and go karting or play soccer with my nephew. I enjoy traveling and am excited to visit Tokyo this summer. What are your plans for your next trip?


Giffords shooting leads nation to introspection and political finger wagging

In the wake of the shooting in Arizona this weekend that critically injured Rep.

EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management

At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from

E-Verify Mandate Begins Today

The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm

EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules

The EPA seal (Pic via The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.

EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann  has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.

EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’

In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work

EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria

The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards

EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’

All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of

EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards

Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy |