Latest In

News

Banks and the Blight They Leave Behind: It’s Not Just Cleveland Anymore

Via Patrick.net, here’s more about how some banks abandoned their foreclosed properties and left innocent neighbors to deal with the blight. And no, this isn’t

Jul 31, 202024.4K Shares452.3K Views
Via Patrick.net, here’s more about how some banks abandoned their foreclosed properties and left innocent neighbors to deal with the blight. And no, this isn’t just happening in Cleveland. In Petaluma, Calif., one neighbor got so fed up fighting with Bank of America– for two years — to clean up the abandoned home next door that she took matters into her own hands.
This morning the Press Democrat ran a front page article titled: “Fight Against Blight“. It details the plight of Phyllis Sharrow of Petaluma who has the unfortunate luck of living next to a foreclosed property. Weeds have overtaken the lawn of the abandoned home next door and her property value is being affected. Calls to Bank of America to try to get the place cleaned up go unanswered. This has been going on for 2 years prompting her to put a sign outside her home with an arrow pointing at the foreclosure stating: “Bank of America. Your taxpayer bailout dollars at work. Our home values lose!”
And there’s a bigger shock for poor Ms. Sharrow: Accordingto the Healdsburg Housing Bubble blog, Bank of America issued a notice of foreclosure but never completed the foreclosure sale. In other words, Bank of America walked away, letting the property sit there, in limbo, the owners gone and no one taking responsibility for it.
It looks like the home was never foreclosed on and therefore is not owned by the bank.
Is Bank of America just sitting on this loan and letting the property deteriorate? I’ve heard that banks are reluctant to foreclose because A) this forces them to recognize a loss on the loan, and B) if they do foreclose they are the owners and are responsible for the property taxes.
To me it looks as if that is what is happening here. But how long can this go on? You would think the banks would want to flush out these loans before the mid- to high-end foreclosure crisisis upon us.
Yes, you would think that — especially from banks propped up by a taxpayer bailout. So far, however, servicers are too swamped to modifylarge numbers of loans and — as this case illustrates — banks are walking away from their properties, even beyond the Rust Belt.
You can’t blame homeowners like Ms. Sharrow for feeling like they are hardly getting their money’s worth from that bailout. Maybe she needs to bring that yard sign to Washington, where few are paying much attention to the problem of bank-owned abandoned homes. Instead, as Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) pointed outrecently, the banks own the place.
And those banks aren’t up against outraged and powerful lawmakers, calling them on the carpet for these practices. Business just goes on as usual. Meantime, in the real world, there’s a frustrated neighbor, a two-year battle, and a yard sign calling for attention.
Rhyley Carney

Rhyley Carney

Reviewer
Latest Articles
Popular Articles