The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent

The Top Five Environmental Whoppers of 2009: An Earth Day Retrospective

Last updated: 07/31/2020 08:00 | 04/23/2009 12:54
Anderson Patterson

Since its inception in 1970, Earth Day has catalyzed as much hysteria as it has environmental stewardship. During the holiday’s first half-decade of observance, many Americans, encouraged by a complicit press, fretted over the impending ecological disaster that would result from global cooling. And the very first Earth Day celebration was accused of being a secret Communist plot, falling as it did on the 100th anniversary of Vladimir Lenin’s birth.

While we may laugh at the fallacies of our forebears, revelers in the 40th annual Earth Day cannot claim to live in an era of environmental enlightenment. In fact, the year 2009 has already produced some of the most misinformed, head-scratching statements on the environment ever uttered by our leaders in Washington. For your Earth Day reading pleasure, here are the top five environmental obfuscators of the year:

5. Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio):

Appearing on ABC’s This Week on Sunday, Boehner, the House minority leader, attempted to articulate a GOP approach to climate change. When George Stephanopoulos pressed him on the Republican plan to tackle carbon emissions, he had this to say in response:

“George, the idea that carbon dioxide is a carcinogen that is harmful to our environment is almost comical. Every time we exhale, we exhale carbon dioxide. Every cow in the world, you know, when they do what they do, you’ve got more carbon dioxide.”

Even if you reject the notion that global warming is man-made, there are still three things wrong with this response, as Joe Romm of Climate Progress points out. First, no one is claiming that carbon dioxide is a carcinogen (in this sense, Boehner is quite right that the idea is “almost comical”). Second, carcinogens are by definition harmful to people, not to the environment. And third, when cows do what Boehner is too bashful to say — i.e., fart — they release methane, which is 22 times more potent a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. If cows simply flatulated carbon dioxide, the world would be a cooler — and more olfactorily pleasing — place.

4. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.):

What’s worse than Boehner’s error-ridden statements on environmental policy? One top contender: reiterating Boehner’s error-ridden statements after they’ve already been thoroughly and embarrassingly repudiated.

On March 23, Boehner and his fellow House Republicans cited an MIT study to attack President Obama’s cap-and-trade plan as a “light switch tax that would cost every American household $3,128 a year.” But they ran into trouble when John Reilly, an author of the study, complained that they had misinterpreted his numbers. Their allegation of a $3,000 tax was “wrong in so many ways it’s hard to begin,” he told the St. Petersburg Times. In reality, he said, the plan would cost each household about $215 annually. What’s worse, House Republicans had contacted him before releasing their talking points, and they simply chose to ignore his objections to their calculations.

But that didn’t stop Bachmann from perpetuating Boehner’s $3,000 tax myth. On April 8, she wrote an op-ed in the Star Tribune that continued this line of attack:

This time, Reilly didn’t bother to respond.

3. Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.):

At a March 25 hearing of the House Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, Shimkus pointed to historic — or rather, prehistoric — precedent to argue that rising levels of greenhouse gases were not cause for concern:

“Today we have about 388 parts per million [of carbon dioxide] in the atmosphere. I think in the age of the dinosaurs, when we had most flora and fauna, we were probably at 4,000 parts per million. There is a theological debate that this is a carbon-starved planet, not too much carbon.”

Never mind that the age of the dinosaurs might have been less than hospitable to human life. The most perplexing part of his statement was his invocation of theology in a discussion of carbon levels in the atmosphere. But he did us the favor of explaining his reasoning:

“The earth will end only when God declares it’s time to be over. A man will not destroy this earth. This earth will not be destroyed by a flood. … I do believe that God’s word is infallible. Unchanging. Perfect.”

If the planet’s going down, why not take separation of church and state with it?

2. Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas):

It’s a bit disheartening to hear the former Energy and Commerce Committee chairman and its current ranking member admit during a Congressional hearing on climate change legislation, “I’m probably below average in my ability to understand these things.” But when it comes to logic, Barton can’t be beat. Take his opening statement at a hearing on March 25 (incidentally, the same one that brought us Shimkus’ words of wisdom):

“Today’s hearing is about adaptation. Adapting is a common natural way for people to adapt to their environment.”

Irrefutable. He continued:

“I think mankind has been adopting — or adapting — to climate for as long as man has walked the earth. When it rains, we find shelter. When it’s hot, we get shade. When it’s cold, we find a warm place to stay. I think that it’s inevitable that humanity will adapt to global warming. … Adaptation to shifts in temperature is not that difficult.”

And in case his audience was not convinced, he returned to his insuperable brand of logic to prove that adaptation had succeeded in the past:

“During the Little Ice Age, both the Vikings and the British adapted to the cold by changing. I suppose that one possible adaptation response of Viking retrenchment and British expansion is that we’re conducting the hearing today in English instead of Norwegian.”

If that doesn’t convince those darn climate alarmists, I don’t know what will.

1. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele

If the mark of a successful political party is consistency of rhetoric between its leaders and its rank-and-file, the GOP must be very successful indeed. Before the aforementioned House Republicans delivered their peculiar analyses, Steele led the way on March 6 with the biggest climate change whopper of them all:

“We are cooling. We are not warming. The warming you see out there, the supposed warming, and I am using my finger quotation marks here, is part of the cooling process. Greenland, which is now covered in ice, it was once called Greenland for a reason, right? Iceland, which is now green. Oh I love this. Like we know what this planet is all about. How long have we been here? How long? Not very long.”

Ah, the warming is just part of the cooling process. The one they were warning us about during those heady first Earth Day celebrations.

And the madness comes full circle.

Anderson Patterson | Anderson is a video editor and developer who believes in the power of visual organization. He recently graduated from the University of Washington, where he concentrated on post-production during his studies. He was first exposed to the mystical world of visual art creation while watching his father edit advertisements when he was a child, and he has been working towards his dream of becoming a video editor ever since.


Rep. Paul Ryan to deliver SOTU response

Chairman of the House Budget Committee Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) will deliver the Republican response to the State of the Union Tuesday, according to Mike Allen

Rep. Parker Griffith (R-Ala.)

One of the most conservative Democrats in the House -- a freshman who said he couldn’t support Nancy Pelosi again -- is going to switch over to the GOP. Josh

Rep. Paulsen allies with medical device industry to relax FDA oversight

Source: Flickr; Republicanconference ( On the heels of the Minnesota Independent story last week about U.S. Rep. Erik Paulsen’s cozy financial relationship with the medical device industry, the New York Times reported Tuesday that some health professionals are alarmed by Paulsen’s push to relax Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight

Rep. Patrick McHenry: Please, Conservatives, Fill Out Your Census Forms!

The conservative congressman from North Carolina, a constant critic of the census -- one of the people who sounded the alarm about politicization when the

Rep. Paulsen touts balanced budget constitutional amendment

In a post for the conservative blog True North , U.S. Rep

Rep. Perlmutter criticizes House measure that would eliminate 800K federal jobs

Congressman Ed Perlmutter today issued a scathing statement criticizing the House of Representatives for passing a spending bill that could put nearly a million federal employees out of work. The Colorado delegation voted strictly on party lines, with all four Republicans voting in favor of the bill and the three Democrats voting in opposition. Perlmutter’s statement: “My number one priority is to get people back to work because that’s the best thing we can do to pay our debt and move forward toward economic stability

Rep. Peace, ACLU seek investigation of soldier’s allegations of racial discrimination in Afghanistan

Both Rep. Steve Pearce (R-NM) and the American Civil Liberties Union agree: There needs to be an investigation into Spc.

Rep. Paulsen, Karl Rove the latest to get ‘glittered’

Rep. Erik Paulsen and former Bush staffer Karl Rove were both showered with glitter at the Midwest Leadership Conference Friday

Rep. Pete Hoekstra Surging in Michigan Gubernatorial Bid

The ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee -- you couldn’t flip on a TV without seeing him in the aftermath of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s botched

School of Hock

A growing number of college grads are defaulting on their student loans as the economy worsens.

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy |