In what The Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim calls a “big boost for climate change,” Sens. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) and John McCain (D-Ariz.) today endorsed the idea of ”cap-and-trade” system to reduced carbon emissions. When President Obama offered his proposal for a cap and trade system last month, even Republicans who had supported the idea last year responded coolly.
Perhaps it is not coincidence that the two Republicans spoke out after Democrats began floating the idea that Obama would stop negotiating with Senate Republicans and use the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process to pass health and energy reforms with 51 votes in the Senate. Just yesterday, Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag pointedly declined to renounce the budget reconciliation strategy, saying “we’re not taking it off the table at this point.”
The two Republicans, Grim notes, “insisted that any effort to sidestep a filibuster by using the budget reconciliation process would erode the bipartisan support.” As I argued here Tuesday, using the budget reconciliation strategy is tempting but probably premature for Obama — and Graham and McCain’s statements show why. By endorsing the concept of cap-and-trade and signaling their willingness to negotiate, the GOP duo has boosted the administration’s chances of getting climate change action with Republican support — and their own chances of shaping legislation.
Graham and McCain both said their support of bipartisan legislation had several conditions, citing the need for investment in so-called “clean coal” as well as nuclear power.
Those are not likely to be deal breakers for Obama. His 2010 budget proposal allocates billions in cap-and-trade revenues to “clean energy technologies” which, despite the objections of environmentalists, can be defined to include coal and nuclear.
There’s no way to prove that the threat of being excluded from cap-and-trade negotiations prompted McCain and Graham to act today. But the fact remains, they didn’t speak up until the threat was made.
EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management
At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from
E-Verify Mandate Begins Today
The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm
EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules
The EPA seal (Pic via sentryjournal.com) The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.
EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.
EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’
All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of
EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’
In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work
EPA: BP Has 24 Hours to Find a Less Toxic Chemical Dispersant
Thought the massive quantities of oil pouring into the Gulf of Mexico were the only major threat to the country’s southeast coastal waters right now? Think
EPA biologist says fracking may be partly to blame for West Virginia fish kill
New documents obtained by an environmental news service show that an EPA analyst believes that wastewater from fracking may be partly responsible for a fish kill in a West Virginia river. Scientific American reports : U.S