Click here to check the ultimate guide to learn how to leverage your PC and internet to make money online.
The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent

A Party of Amnesiacs

As Weigel pointed out earlier, the GOP appears poised to make a strategy of blaming Democrats -- notably Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (Conn.) --

Tyreece Bauer
News
Last updated: Jul 31, 2020 | Mar 20, 2009

As Weigel pointed out earlier, the GOP appears poised to make a strategy of blaming Democrats — notably Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (Conn.) — for allowing the AIG bonuses that have become so controversial this week.

We pointed out a few reasons earlier today why Dodd doesn’t bear the blame (at least no more or less than most others in this town). Yet it’s worth going back even further to understand where the laxity originated that permitted enormous paydays for the same folks who ruined their companies.

Start the clock in September, when Henry Paulson, treasury secretary under the Bush White House, was charged with selling Congress on the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. As part of his pitch, Paulson, along with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, repeatedly insisted that executive compensation limits should be avoided, lest they hobble the effectiveness of the program.

“If we design it so it’s punitive and so institutions aren’t going to participate,” Paulson told Fox News at the time, “this won’t work the way we need it to work.”

Congressional leaders (including Dodd) caved, adding only a few loophole-filled provisions restricting executive pay, including language that the Treasury “shall require that the financial institution meet appropriate standards for executive compensation.”

Fast forward to December, when Neel Kashkari, appointed by the Bush administration to administer TARP, appeared before the House Financial Services Committee, where he was asked point blank by Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) whether enormous AIG bonuses — some reportedly as high as $3 million — were indeed “appropriate” considering that the flailing insurance giant had already received $152 billion in federal help. The exchange is eye-opening:

SHERMAN: Sir, have you met your responsibility to require that appropriate standards of executive compensation be imposed on AIG and the other recipients of TARP funds?

KASHKARI: This is an important issue that we must not lump all of the institutions together.

SHERMAN: I’m not.  I’m asking about A-I-G.  Is a three million dollar bonus an appropriate standard of executive compensation, or has the law been violated?

KASHKARI: Congressman, I can’t… I do not have the details of what the bonus levels are at AIG.

SHERMAN: Well, you are the one who is supposed to impose appropriate levels of executive compensation.  Have you done that?  Or, are they making payments of executive compensation that are not appropriate? Or are you just blind to whether they are appropriate or not?

KASHKARI: Congressman, we have imposed on AIG new corporate governance standards, executive compensation standards and expense policy standards…

SHERMAN: Do your standards prevent the payment of a three million dollar bonus?

KASHKARI: I do not believe that they specifically prevent a payment of a three million dollar bonus.

SHERMAN: So have you imposed appropriate standards for appropriate executive compensation?  Are you here to tell this committee that appropriate standards of executive compensation would allow a three million dollar bonus?  How about a 30 million dollar bonus?  Would that be appropriate compensation?  Or would that be prohibited by any standards that met the statutory requirement imposed on Treasury?

KASHKARI: Congressman, in the case of AIG, we replaced with the Federal Reserve the senior management of AIG.

SHERMAN: Sir, I didn’t ask you about corporate governance.  I didn’t ask you about the make-up of the executives.  I asked whether a three million dollar bonus, or a 30 million dollar bonus, is consistent with a statutory requirement that we have appropriate standards on executive compensation.  Let me ask it specifically.  As to 30 million dollars, is that appropriate or inappropriate?  Or you have no opinion?

KASHKARI: I am not in the position to opine on a specific number if it is appropriate or not.

In light of all the recorded statements and testimonies, the GOP’s Dodd-centered criticisms should be easy to shoot down. Then again, no one ever claimed that accuracy was more important than messaging in this town.

And, of course, Kashkari is still in charge of TARP.

Tyreece Bauer | Analyst and photographer in the field of technology. When I'm not working on my laptop, I like to go surfing, hiking with friends, and go karting or play soccer with my nephew. I enjoy traveling and am excited to visit Tokyo this summer. What are your plans for your next trip?

Related

$1.89 billion given to states to fight HIV

The federal government Monday announced more than $1.89 billion in funding to states to fight the HIV epidemic with access to care and with more cash for the failing AIDS Drug Assistance Program. According to an HHS press release , $813 million of that money will go directly to the ADAP programming. An additional $8,386,340 will be issued as a supplement to 36 states and territories currently facing a litany of unmet needs and access issues.

Army Data Shows Constraints on Troop Increase Potential

If President Obama orders an additional 30,000 to 40,000 troops to Afghanistan, he will be deploying practically every available U.S. Army brigade to war, leaving few units in reserve in case of an unforeseen emergency and further stressing a force that has seen repeated combat deployments since 2002.

1. Brian Schweitzer

As governor of Montana, Schweitzer doesn’t represent one of the most highly populated, high-profile electoral states in the country. But this

$1.3 Million for Brown

The GOP’s candidate in the Massachusetts special election raised more than one million dollars -- double the goal -- in a 24-hour moneybomb on the Ron Paul

$1.3 trillion in federal spending unaccounted for, report finds

Despite calls for independent bodies to keep government accountable, the Sunlight Foundation’s most recent Clearspending report has found the federal

#1 in Conspiracy Theories

Andrew Young’s tell-all biography of John Edwards, hitting shelves next week, is surging in one Amazon.com category in particular. #1 in Conspiracy

1 Brigade and 1 Battalion

ISTANBUL – It’s 10 p.m. in the lowest level of the Istanbul airport. In 20 minutes I’ll be allowed to board my plane to Kabul, bringing me to the

$1 Million for Toomey

Pat Toomey, the former Club for Growth president and leading Republican candidate in Pennsylvania’s 2010 Senate race, has announced a $1 million haul in the

1. Lindsey Graham

Sen. Graham (R-S.C.) is typically regarded as a reliable vote for his party, but he took the bold step of breaking with his fellow Republicans to join Kerry

Bachmann uncomfortable over earmarks ban

Republicans appear to have boxed themselves into a corner with their portrayal of earmarks as wasteful spending, as many of them have backed a moratorium on

Troubled mine holds hope for U.S. rare earth industry

China currently controls 97 percent of the world’s rare earth production. The Mountain Pass Mine could change that -- if it can overcome serious environmental concerns.

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy | twi.news@washingtonindependent.com

Click here to check the ultimate guide to learn how to leverage your PC and internet to make money online.