The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent

Is This the Hill Sam Brownback Wants to Die On?

Camilo Wood
News
Last updated: Jul 31, 2020 | Mar 18, 2009

Returning for a second to the GOP opposition to Chris Hill, the Obama administration’s choice to be the next Iraq ambassador. Josh Rogin’s write-up for Congressional Quarterly highlights this criticism from Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kans.), one of the five Republican senators calling on President Obama to withdraw Hill’s nomination:

At a July hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hill, as the chief negotiator for the six-party talks, promised Brownback he would elevate the human rights issue in bilateral discussions and invite Jay Lefkowitz, the State Department’s special envoy for North Korean human rights, to all future negotiations with the North Koreans.

In exchange, Brownback lifted his hold on the nomination of Kathleen Stephens to become ambassador to South Korea. Neither promise was kept, Brownback said. “I had a direct statement made to me in open hearing and nothing happened,” he said.

Let’s assume for the sake of argument that Chris Hill flat-out lied to Sam Brownback. That he had his fingers crossed under the witness table. That he deleted Jay Lefkowitz’s phone number from his BlackBerry on the way out of the hearing room. That he laughed maniacally as soon as the hold on Stephens was lifted. So what?

There’s a solid case to be made that Hill, who’s never served in the Middle East, doesn’t have the experience necessary to be the next Iraq ambassador. That case has been made way more complicated by the endorsements of the past three Iraq ambassadors — is Ryan Crocker gambling with the security of the Iraq mission???? — but still. Beyond that case, to argue that a talented diplomat (in the words of GOP Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham) shouldn’t get an important wartime position because he misled a senator about a detail while maneuvering a diplomatic breakthrough about North Korean nuclear disarmament makes Brownback look trivial. If he wants to argue that Hill compromised the North Korea mission, he’ll have a hard time explaining away the mostly completed closure of the Yongbyon nuclear reactor.

What’s more, with Brownback being off the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his options for stopping Hill’s nomination are limited to filibustering Hill after the committee votes him to the full Senate. At that point he’ll be essentially re-litigating a mostly successful *Bush administration *policy around the question of a personal assurance — after Hill has the support of the previous three Iraq ambassadors and the GOP leader of the relevant Senate committee. This is a fight Brownback wants?

Camilo Wood | Every day, to make a conscious decision to do something, say something, or act in a way that will improve my work experience. I assist organisations in disrupting the status quo of transition. I teach them how to turn their community from enduring change to evolving through change using a realistic and repeatable structure.

Related

Giffords shooting leads nation to introspection and political finger wagging

In the wake of the shooting in Arizona this weekend that critically injured Rep.

EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management

At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from

E-Verify Mandate Begins Today

The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm

EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules

The EPA seal (Pic via sentryjournal.com) The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.

EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann  has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.

EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’

In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work

EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria

The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards

EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’

All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of

EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards

Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy | twi.news@washingtonindependent.com