Andrew Ross Sorkin takes a shot at explaining why we have to pay those AIG bonuses today in The New York Times. Sorkin explains that he knows it’s not a popular
Andrew Ross Sorkin takes a shot at explaining why we have to pay those AIG bonuses today in The New York Times. Sorkin explains that he knows it’s not a popular view to even try to justify the bonuses — but it’s the new reality of how the business world works in post-bailout America.
And it’s all far worse than you might think.
Sorkin offers an answer to a question I’ve been asking for a while: Who wants to hire those supposed AIG financial geniuses? They brought one of the world’s largest insurance firms to its knees and put the entire economy at risk.
Well, guess who does want them — and apparently is even fighting for their services?
It’s the companies that want to bet on AIG’s demise, using the expertise of the former employees who put together its house of cards in the first place. From Sorkin:
A.I.G. built this bomb, and it may be the only outfit that really knows how to defuse it.
A.I.G. employees concocted complex derivatives that then wormed their way through the global financial system. If they leave — the buzz on Wall Street is that some have, and more are ready to — they might simply turn around and trade against A.I.G.’s book. Why not? They know how bad it is. They built it.
So as unpalatable as it seems, taxpayers need to keep some of these brainiacs in their seats, if only to prevent them from turning against the company. In the end, we may actually be better off if they can figure out how to unwind these tricky investments.
Let’s see if I understand this: We have to pay to keep in place the people who put together ruinous financial deals, only because they are the only ones who understand how to unwind them – and they’ll take that information and use it against their former company, and American taxpayers, if they don’t get their millions in bonuses.
This goes far beyond the pale. If the government can’t act because of the sanctity of compensation contracts — I still don’t fully buy this explanation, but that’s for another day — there are still things the rest of us can do.
Let the sun shine in. Fire up the FOIA requests. Support New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo as he goes after the names of those getting the bonuses. I talked about this on Monday — let the friends and neighbors of those holding AIG and the American taxpayers hostage with their bonus demands know exactly who they are.
I guess Wall Street must have operated this way for years — take what you can for yourself, screw over the company you left behind, get a pat on the back for your cleverness — but things are different now. We’re in a crisis that is increasingly draining away public funds that could go to other uses, and we all have the right to know what’s going on with our money, and who is benefiting from it — especially for personal gain rather than the public good. And if it’s true that AIG employees want to go elsewhere and use their knowledge to tank the company if they don’t get their money, then let them stand up and admit it. I’m not talking about vigilantism. Just the more powerful weapon of public shame, like what happened in Houston after Enron fell. Maybe it won’t be so socially acceptable to strut your ability to rip off your former employer and your country anymore.
And going forward, the Obama administration must put a stop to this. Non-compete clauses are common in the corporate world. Take a bonus from AIG in its inevitable next round of bailout funds, and sign on the dotted line that if you leave the company you won’t use your knowledge to work for its demise. AIG financial products employees should probably sign such a clause regardless of whether they receive a bonus, because it’s the right thing to do.
If anything good comes out of this financial crisis, maybe it will be the return of shame. Don’t count on it, though. Wall Street’s probably already gearing up to fight off financial reform. We should be smarter about this, moving forward. Follow the money that gets spent by the financial industry to fend off new rules and regulations. Stop letting firms that taxpayers are keeping afloat make all the decisions behind closed doors. Make compensation and bonuses an open book. The lesson from this AIG mess isn’t just about derivatives and credit default swps. It’s much simpler: Don’t allow the public to get blindsided again.
Rep. Paul Ryan to deliver SOTU response
Chairman of the House Budget Committee Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) will deliver the Republican response to the State of the Union Tuesday, according to Mike Allen
Rep. Parker Griffith (R-Ala.)
One of the most conservative Democrats in the House -- a freshman who said he couldn’t support Nancy Pelosi again -- is going to switch over to the GOP. Josh
Rep. Paulsen touts balanced budget constitutional amendment
In a post for the conservative blog True North , U.S. Rep
Rep. Patrick McHenry: Please, Conservatives, Fill Out Your Census Forms!
The conservative congressman from North Carolina, a constant critic of the census -- one of the people who sounded the alarm about politicization when the
Rep. Paulsen, Karl Rove the latest to get ‘glittered’
Rep. Erik Paulsen and former Bush staffer Karl Rove were both showered with glitter at the Midwest Leadership Conference Friday
Rep. Paulsen allies with medical device industry to relax FDA oversight
Source: Flickr; Republicanconference (www.flickr.com/photos/republicanconference) On the heels of the Minnesota Independent story last week about U.S. Rep. Erik Paulsen’s cozy financial relationship with the medical device industry, the New York Times reported Tuesday that some health professionals are alarmed by Paulsen’s push to relax Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight
Rep. Perlmutter criticizes House measure that would eliminate 800K federal jobs
Congressman Ed Perlmutter today issued a scathing statement criticizing the House of Representatives for passing a spending bill that could put nearly a million federal employees out of work. The Colorado delegation voted strictly on party lines, with all four Republicans voting in favor of the bill and the three Democrats voting in opposition. Perlmutter’s statement: “My number one priority is to get people back to work because that’s the best thing we can do to pay our debt and move forward toward economic stability
Rep. Perlmutter to hold constituent meet-up in grocery store
Colorado Congressman Ed Perlmutter will hold a Government in the Grocery constituent meet-up this evening from 5-7 at the Safeway at 38th and Wadsworth in Wheat Ridge. The address is 3900 Wadsworth. The meeting, where Perlmutter typically sits at a folding table and talks to whomever shows up, is free and open to the public
Rep. Pete Stark Won’t Dignify Constituent by, er, Micturating Upon His Leg
In the tradition of Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), California Democratic Rep. Pete Stark revealed at a recent town hall gathering that there are limits to what
School of Hock
A growing number of college grads are defaulting on their student loans as the economy worsens.