The stakes are high for the next roll-out of a new financial plan by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Obama Administration. In the midst of a House
The stakes are high for the next roll-out of a new financial plan by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Obama Administration. In the midst of a House Financial Services Committee hearing Wednesday to question top banking executives on their use of money from the Troubled Assets Relief Program, the Office of Thrift Supervision announced that banks had agreed to suspend foreclosures for three weeks. During that time period, apparently, Treasury and the Obama administration will put final touches on their effort to help homeowners and stop foreclosures — the missing piece from the bank rescue plan Geithner announced Tuesday.
First of all, as we’ve written before, moratoriums on foreclosures don’t do much, except for kicking the problem down the road. But we’ll keep an open mind here, since this plan is supposed to be the plan-to-end-all-plans, the final loan modification standards that will end the logjam that has held up all other efforts.
Based on the roll-out of the bank rescue effort, I can think of three things that most likely won’t be in the plan because they would require the acceptance of some unsettling hard truths — even though all of them will be necessary to ensure the success of a foreclosure plan.
First, the administration should just come out and acknowledge that any plan will be unfair. People who’ve kept current on their mortgage payments, or didn’t buy an expensive house beyond their reach, won’t be rewarded. Some people who bought houses they shouldn’t have, and who didn’t make the mortgage payments they agreed to in their contracts, will get help. It’s unfair, but an unending tide of foreclosures is killing the economy, and something has to be done, for the greater good. Obama has said he’ll announce the plan personally, and he needs to note that while it’s true some borrowers who probably don’t deserve it will get to stay in their houses, avoiding foreclosures benefits everyone — by ending neighborhood blight, stopping house prices from falling, and stabilizing banks. Everyone knows this, but it would make the plan more credible if the administration admits it up front.
Second, not everyone can be helped. Some foreclosures will be unavoidable. It’s unreasonable and unrealistic to expect servicers to modify loans that will go into default anyway. Some people still won’t be able to afford their homes, even with lower monthly payments, because the homes were too overpriced to begin with. And house prices continue to fall. The worst outcome would be to modify hundreds of thousands of loans, then see house prices fall and homeowners find themselves underwater once again. In markets where the housing bubble grew completely out of hand, some borrowers simply aren’t going to be able to afford the homes they are in, no matter what. And that needs to be said.
Which brings us to the third hard truth. Renting is the overlooked option here. Government policies have focused for decades on supporting homeownership, and this must change. Homeowners who can’t be helped by modifications and will still lose their homes need alternatives, and the government can help by turning its focus to policies to support safe, decent and affordable rentals. It’s the new reality of the housing market, but the government continues to lag behind.
So there you have it. Don’t expect to hear any of this. The plan will likely be sold as a breakthrough — as government’s way of helping as many people as possible to stay in their homes. That will be true, of course. But when it comes to foreclosures and rescue plans, it’s not actually the hard truth.
EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management
At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from
EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules
The EPA seal (Pic via sentryjournal.com) The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.
EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’
In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work
E-Verify Mandate Begins Today
The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm
EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.
EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards
Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some
EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria
The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards
EPA biologist says fracking may be partly to blame for West Virginia fish kill
New documents obtained by an environmental news service show that an EPA analyst believes that wastewater from fracking may be partly responsible for a fish kill in a West Virginia river. Scientific American reports : U.S
EPA Chief Overruled Calif. Waiver, Too
The Washington Post reported in March that EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson was overruled by the White House in setting an ozone standard. Now, documents