The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent

Former Lobbyist Could Still Do Business with Raytheon from Pentagon

Even though there’s a new administration in Washington promising broad ethics reforms, it looks like the old way of doing things may still be alive and well in

Daisy-Mae Schmitt
News
Last updated: Jul 31, 2020 | Jan 26, 2009

Even though there’s a new administration in Washington promising broad ethics reforms, it looks like the old way of doing things may still be alive and well in President Obama’s Defense Department.

If appointed, Obama’s nominee for deputy secretary of defense, former Raytheon lobbyist William Lynn, wouldn’t have to recuse himself from decisions involving* *Raytheon–despite Obama’s stringent new ethics rules, The Associated Press reported Saturday.

A former Raytheon Co. lobbyist, who is nominated to be deputy defense secretary, has agreed to sell his stock in the military contractor and similar holdings but will not be forced to step back from decisions related to his former employer, the Defense Department said Friday.

Instead, William J. Lynn’s dealings at the Pentagon will be subject to ethics reviews for one year, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

Ethics reviews? Allowing Lynn to do business with his former employer would make a mockery of President-elect Obama’s new ethics rules for his administration.

On his first day in office, Obama signed an executive order to slow the “revolving door” between lobbying and government work, drawing widespread praise for taking a tough stance against influence-peddling.

Under these new rules, lobbyists hired fresh off K Street would be subject to severe restrictions during their first two years on the job. They would be barred not only from making any decisions about their former clients, but also from working on any of their old lobbying issues, as well as from seeking employment with any federal agency they lobbied.

The rules appear to disqualify Lynn on all three counts. According to Raytheon’s 2008 first-quarter lobbying disclosure form, available at OpenSecrets.org, Lynn — who, according to his company bio,  was Raytheon’s senior vice president of government operations and strategy from August 2002 until last week –  lobbied on the FY09 Defense Appropriations Bill and other key defense and intelligence legislation for “provisions related to acquisition policy, force protection, military space and intelligence, command and control, simulation and training, self-defense systems and decoys, missile defense, sensors and radars, missiles, munitions and artillery, and advanced technology programs.” Doesn’t leave much out, does it? If Lynn had to recuse himself from all those areas, his first two years in office wouldn’t be very busy.

The same lobbying disclosure form shows that Lynn’s team lobbied the Department of Defense, where he now hopes to work–which would be another no-no if Obama’s rules applied to Lynn.

Allowing Lynn to take over the No. 2 spot at the Pentagon invites conflicts of interest, both real and perceived. The deputy secretary of defense is the department’s chief operating officer – which includes overseeing acquisitions. If he gets the job, he’ll pretty much have to do business with Raytheon.

Raytheon received $11.62 billion in federal contracts in 2007 (the last year for which complete records are available) with billions more going to Raytheon’s subsidiaries and strategic partners, according to OMB Watch’s database, FedSpending.org–not a bad return on its lobbying investment that year, which OpenSecrets.org pegs at $6.58 million.

So, how did our president reconcile his tough ethics standards with doing what he wanted? He didn’t. Instead, Obama wrote Lynn a special permission slip to exempt him the new revolving door ban. And with Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin’s (D-Mich.) announcement that he is dropping his hold on Lynn’s nomination, the path is now clear for Lynn’s confirmation.

Of course, Lynn deserves the benefit of the doubt — he hasn’t taken office and he hasn’t done anything unethical. Presumably, the Obama administration will be vigilant to make sure it stays that way, considering all the negative press this appointment has generated.

But putting a lobbyist for a major defense contractor at the helm of the Defense Department’s acquisitions operation is hardly change we can believe in.

Daisy-Mae Schmitt | Daisy-Mae is obsessed with inventing new ways to create awesome content that's absurdly useful and successful, with over ten years of editorial and inbound marketing experience. She also serves as a reporter, strategist, interviewer, mentor, and therapist for in-house contributors and clients.

Related

Giffords shooting leads nation to introspection and political finger wagging

In the wake of the shooting in Arizona this weekend that critically injured Rep.

EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management

At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from

E-Verify Mandate Begins Today

The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm

EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules

The EPA seal (Pic via sentryjournal.com) The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.

EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann  has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.

EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’

In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work

EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria

The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards

EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’

All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of

EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards

Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy | twi.news@washingtonindependent.com