When Justice Paul Pfeifer undertook a crusade to restore the death penalty in Ohio in the early 1980s, he was a state senator. Now a state Supreme Court
When Justice Paul Pfeifer undertook a crusade to restore the death penalty in Ohio in the early 1980s, he was a state senator. Now a state Supreme Court justice, Pfeifer wants to see it done away with altogether.
Alongside the family members of both murder victims and death row exonerees, Pfeifer testified before state legislators Wednesday in favor of House Bill 160, which would abolish the death penalty in Ohio. Afterward, Pfeifer told reporters at the Ohio Statehouse that Ohio’s death penalty policy no longer serves the state, and that capital punishment should be abolished.
Pfeifer noted that, while he has a duty to follow the law, he is also obligated to “step forward and advocate for changes that would lead to improvement.”
“I think abolishing the death penalty would be a needed improvement,” Pfeifer said. “It will happen. Will it be today, tomorrow, in this session of the General Assembly? More problematic. … but the day will come when Ohio no longer has a death penalty.”
Pfeifer supported his declaration (an especially bold one, as Ohio has recently pioneered a new, more “humane” single-drug method for lethal injection) by pointing to a national trend away from capital punishment, such as the U.S. Supreme Court’s prohibition on executing the mentally retarded.
“I think the next step will probably be taking a look at those who had a serious mental illness at the time they committed the crime,” he said, offering as example a recent and grisly case in which the murderer was caught after confessing the crime to a priest. In doing so, the deranged man demonstrated that he understood what he had done was wrong, which automatically made him eligible for the death penalty.
Pfeifer also opined that the electric chair was a preferable method of execution, if its value as a deterrent were to be taken seriously.
“If there’s any argument for it as a deterrent, the more unpleasant, the more unspeakable the method of execution, the more likely it would be to be a deterrent,” he said of the electric chair. “But, if you look at the data from states that don’t have [the death penalty], you see roughly the same number of murders, aggravated murders, so it’s impossible to make a case that the death penalty deters anyone.”
When asked whether he regretted his role in the death penalty’s restoration, Pfeifer said he was mostly just surprised at the way the Ohio Supreme Court had broadened its reach.
“’Proper calculation and design’ [premeditation] is about a millisecond, and when we put it in, we were [targeting] people who planned a murder,” he said. “That’s no longer the case, and that’s the result of a number of Supreme Court decisions, many of which were made before I even arrived at the Court.
“We clearly meant to get the garden-variety domestic dispute, where murder ends up being the outcome, out of the death penalty,” he continued. “Some of my colleagues say, ‘You couldn’t have meant that,’ I think they view it as a harsh view toward women, but that is in fact what we were trying to do then,” he said, adding that the definition of kidnapping, which can be used by a prosecutor to qualify a defendant for the death penalty, had been greatly expanded, as well.
“We have a number of cases where, if you point a gun at a person for a few minutes, you are now guilty of kidnapping,” he said.
While not part of his testimony, Pfeifer added that citizens would want to move away from the death penalty as they realize what it means culturally.
“We don’t find ourselves in great company when we look at the countries that still use the death penalty,” he said. “I think we’re seventh in the world. We follow China, Saudi Arabia, Iran. … That’s the kind of company we’re keeping with the heavy use of the death penalty. And I think that’s uncomfortable to most citizens, as they begin to recognize that most of what we consider ‘developed countries’ don’t use the death penalty at all.”
Watch Pfeifer talk to reporters:
(Photo: Flickr Getty Images/Dave Delay)
MA-Sen: 150 Conservative Bloggers Fan Out, Looking for Scandals
BOSTON -- The mysterious Election Journal blog, which first released the infamous 2008 video of two bumbling New Black Panther Party members waving nightsticks
MA-Sen: 66 to 19
BOSTON -- That, via Alex Isenstadt and Josh Kraushaar, is the number that defined the Massachusetts Senate race more than anything else. From the primary
MA-Sen: A Text Message From Scott Brown
BOSTON -- Having signed up for Scott Brown’s text message service for election day, I just got this text: Are you about to have lunch? It’s a great time to
MA-Sen: Loyal Democrats Grouse About Coakley
BOSTON -- A little while after noon, a steady crowd of Democratic voters streamed into the Cathedral High School Gymnasium to cast votes for their party’s
MA-Sen: Brown Wins
BOSTON -- At 9:20, the first rumors of Scott Brown’s victory in the Massachusetts Senate race started to work around the room. A moment later, Doug Flutie
MA-Sen Photos: ‘Paint the Town Red! Croakley’s Dead!’
Below are some photos of yesterday’s People’s Rally in Worcester, the rally that Brown held to counter-program the Obama rally in Boston. The crush of
MA-Sen: Out-of-Staters for Brown
BOSTON -- A surprising discovery at yesterday’s People’s Rally in Worcester was just how many people had traveled into the state to assist, in whatever way,
Menendez, Lautenberg to Continue BP-Lockerbie Investigation
Sens. Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg, both New Jersey Democrats, will continue to seek details about BP’s alleged involvement in the release last year of
Net Investors Bullish on Palin’s Prospects for Staying on Ticket
Just for fun, the Internet prediction Website Intrade has opened a contract on whether Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin will be withdrawn as McCain’s running mate.
No Experience Necessary
Gov. Sarah Palin’s a middle-class hockey mom, but does that really qualify her to be vice president?