Click here to check the ultimate guide to learn how to leverage your PC and internet to make money online.
The Washington Independent
The Washington Independent

Further explanation of federal board decision denying immigrants advisal before questioning

On Tuesday, TAI reported that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), a body that is part of the U.S. Justice Department, made a decision on August 11 arguing

Gordon Dickerson
Last updated: Jul 31, 2020 | Aug 18, 2011

Image by: Matt Mahurin
On Tuesday, TAI reported that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), a body that is part of the U.S. Justice Department, made a decision on August 11 arguing that federal regulations do not require that immigrants arrested without a warrant have to be notified of their rights before being questioned. That decision was made by a panel that consisted of two George W. Bush-era appointees and one Clinton-era appointee.

The BIA currently consists of 14 judges appointed by the U.S. attorney general (without U.S. Senate confirmation) that exists within the Executive Office for Immigration Review in the Justice Department. The August 11 decision was issued by a panel of three BIA members, which comprised of two members appointed by Bush-era attorneys general (one by John Ashcroft and one by Michael Mukasey), and one appointed by Clinton administration Attorney General Janet Reno. The decision was written by Roger Pauley, the Ashcroft appointee.

The decision comes at a time when immigrant rights groups have criticized the Obama administration for harsh immigration enforcement efforts, a practice inherited from the previous administration which escalated deportations over the course of the 2000s.

The issue at the heart of the BIA’s decision is timing. Federal immigration officials are constrained by the Fourth Amendment and the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment, as well as by the Immigration and Nationality Act and federal regulations. Regulations provide certain protections to immigrants which are not in the Constitution, among which is the requirement that federal officials notify immigrants of their rights to obtain an attorney (not at the government’s expense) and that anything they say will be used against them, before they are placed in formal deportation hearings.

The time period between when an immigrant is arrested by the authorities without a warrant — for example, during a workplace raid, or while federal officials are entering a house or workplace with a warrant for some reason other than arresting the immigrant — and when they are placed in deportation proceedings has been a gray area as far as the immigrant’s specific rights are concerned. Before the August 11 decision, the federal regulation dictating the timing of rights advisal had been interpreted in conflicting ways by different courts. Immigration lawyers argued that advisals should occur before questioning, and two federal appeals courts, the Second and the Eighth, have agreed. In 2009, however, the Ninth Circuit argued that the language of the regulation implies that notifications don’t have to precede questioning.

The Ninth Circuit has a jurisdiction that covers two of the states with the largest proportions of unauthorized immigrants in America, California and Arizona (according to the Pew Hispanic Center), so its opinion on this matter carried some impact. But with the Justice Department’s own appellate body weighing in on the side of the Ninth Circuit, decreased protections for immigrants arrested without warrants could become a reality throughout the entire nation.

One important caveat is that current U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder can still vacate the BIA’s decision, an action that is rare but was recently done in the case of a man who wished to stay in the country with his male partner but whose deportation was upheld by the BIA under the Defense of Marriage Act. Whether Holder wishes to intervene and override the BIA panel, none of whose members were appointed by Holder, in an effort to preserve legal protections for immigrants remains to be seen.

Gordon Dickerson | Gordon Dickerson is the founder of J.C.H, a one-person company that helps employers with resumes, cover letters, bios, LinkedIn profiles, and other employment-related documents. John also provides career coaching and advice on how to follow up on resumes, and he will also link clients with recruiters in their field. Gordon 's inherent passion for working with people and counseling them on their careers led him to extend his services to include career coaching, which he has been happily doing since 2008.


Giffords shooting leads nation to introspection and political finger wagging

In the wake of the shooting in Arizona this weekend that critically injured Rep.

EPA Administrator Addresses Concerns About Oil Spill Waste Management

At a hearing of the national oil spill commission today, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson addressed concerns about waste disposal from

E-Verify Mandate Begins Today

The Obama administration today begins implementation of a new mandate to require all federal contractors to check the legal status of their employees to confirm

EPA administrator defends allowing Florida to write its own water pollution rules

The EPA seal (Pic via The Environmental Protection Agency has come under fire for its decision to allow the state of Florida to write its own water pollution rules (known as “numeric nutrient criteria”). EPA Regional Administrator Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming is now firing back, writing that the Agency commends the state Department of Environmental Protection for its draft of a proposed standard. A host of environmental groups filed suit in 2008, seeking to compel the EPA to implement a strict set of water pollution standards in Florida, arguing that the state was in violation of the Clean Water Act.

EPA administrator fires back at critics in op-ed

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson (Pic by USACEpublicaffairs, via Flickr) EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson penned a new op-ed for the Los Angeles Times , criticizing House Republicans desperately seeking to undermine the authority of the agency they have dubbed a “job killer.” Arguing that the environment affects red states and blue states alike, Jackson writes that “it is time for House Republicans to stop politicizing our air and water.” As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Jackson has faced harsh criticism from House Republicans and GOP presidential candidates who say the agency’s regulations are an undue burden on businesses that have to cut jobs simply to comply with clean water and air rules. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann  has pledged to end the EPA if she takes office. “Since the beginning of this year, Republicans in the House have averaged roughly a vote every day the chamber has been in session to undermine the Environmental Protection Agency and our nation’s environmental laws,” writes Jackson.

EPA administrator says federal nutrient criteria is a ‘myth’

In testimony given late last week, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said that false accusations about her agency’s numeric nutrient criteria to govern Florida waterways are proving to be a detriment to their implementation. # Testifying before the House Agriculture Committee, Jackson said her agency’s work was often “mischaracterized” and addressed several myths surrounding its work

EPA announces hold on nutrient standards if Florida can come up with own criteria

The EPA announced today that it is now prepared to withdraw a portion of its proposed numeric nutrient criteria (a set of standards governing water pollution in inland waters) and delay the portion related to estuarine waters, to allow the state Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own criteria. # From a statement released by the EPA earlier today: # EPA recognizes that states have the primary role in establishing and implementing water quality standards for their waters. Therefore, EPA is prepared to withdraw the federal inland standards and delay the estuarine standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, their own protective and scientifically sound numeric standards

EPA Analysis Says Climate Bill’s Cost for Households Would Be ‘Modest’

All the attention on the energy front today is going to the BP spill, but the Environmental Protection Agency quietly released its long-anticipated analysis of

EPA and California Near Deal on Fuel Efficiency Standards

Two weeks ago, the Obama administration raised fuel efficiency standards by an average of two miles per gallon -- a modest change that disappointed some

© Copyright 2021 The Washington Independent All Rights Reserved

Terms & Privacy |

Click here to check the ultimate guide to learn how to leverage your PC and internet to make money online.