<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; U.S. banking system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/us-banking-system/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Recapturing Writedowns</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44455/recapturing-writedowns</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/44455/recapturing-writedowns#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Avent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accretable yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Countrywide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.p. morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merrill lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. banking system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wachovia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WaMu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington mutual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a fun accounting term to remember: accretable yield. That&#8217;s the difference between a loan&#8217;s value on a bank&#8217;s balance sheet and the expected cash flow from the loan. Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#38;sid=aZ838mo99dGo">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>JPMorgan Chase &#38; Co. stands to reap a $29 billion windfall thanks to an accounting rule that lets</p></blockquote><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/44455/recapturing-writedowns" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a fun accounting term to remember: accretable yield. That&#8217;s the difference between a loan&#8217;s value on a bank&#8217;s balance sheet and the expected cash flow from the loan. Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aZ838mo99dGo">reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. stands to reap a $29 billion windfall thanks to an accounting rule that lets the second-biggest U.S. bank transform bad loans it purchased from Washington Mutual Inc. into income.</p>
<p>Wells Fargo &amp; Co., Bank of America Corp. and PNC Financial Services Group Inc. are also poised to benefit from taking over home lenders Wachovia Corp., Countrywide Financial Corp. and National City Corp., regulatory filings show. The deals provide a combined $56 billion in so-called accretable yield, the difference between the value of the loans on the banks’ balance sheets and the cash flow they’re expected to produce.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are a few interesting storylines embedded in the piece. One is that the $29 billion writedown on Washington Mutual&#8217;s loan portfolio may actually have been too small. Calculated Risk <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/05/revisiting-jpmorgan-wamu-acquisition.html">notes</a> that the figures JPMorgan used to calculate expected losses corresponded to a much shallower recession than has actually been experienced. PNC, for example, has been more conservative than JPMorgan in estimating anticipated accretable yield income, based on lingering uncertainty in housing markets.</p>
<p>But the piece also touches on two other related, and important, issues.<span id="more-44455"></span></p>
<p>Namely, the decision to seize WaMu and the impact of the resulting mood on subsequent banking transactions. There is a line of thought in the financial world, originating with <a href="http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/">John Hempton</a> but receiving a <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/05/26/revisiting-wamu/">vote of confidence</a> from Felix Salmon today, which states that it was the WaMu collapse, rather than the Lehman failure, which did most of the damage during last autumn&#8217;s financial crisis. Both incidents involved significant pain for bank debtholders &#8212; the chill wind that froze the credit markets. But while Lehman&#8217;s demise was the bigger and more stunning of the two, WaMu&#8217;s takeover was the event that turned debtholder pain from a one-off into a trend &#8212; which said, basically, that bank creditors everywhere should be nervous (a message they heeded).</p>
<p>What seems indisputable is that if allowing Lehman to fail was a bad decision, the seizure of WaMu was an <em>incredibly</em> bad decision. Increasingly, WaMu stakeholders seem to have a sound case that they received a raw deal, but it also looks as though National City, Wachovia, and Merrill Lynch were handed over on terms far too generous to the buyers, all thanks to the climate of terror that prevailed on Wall Street in the wake of the September crisis. A reference point &#8212; Bank of America&#8217;s expected accretable yield on its Countrywide portfolio is far more anemic than its anticipated yield on its Merrill loans. The difference? The world wasn&#8217;t panicking when Bank of America bought Countrywide.</p>
<p>What this all points to is the desperate need for clear authorization and a clear procedure for the orderly nationalization of systemically important banks in a time of crisis. We broke the glass last year and found nothing available save an extinguisher meant for much smaller fires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/44455/recapturing-writedowns/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Midas Write the Future?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/13547/did-midas-write-the-future</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/13547/did-midas-write-the-future#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Pappu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. banking system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=13547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1987, Michael M. Thomas, my former colleague at The New York Observer, published &#8220;The Ropespinner Conspiracy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The title derives from a remark attributed to Lenin, &#8220;The capitalists will sell us the rope with which to hang them.&#8221; The book is a twisted tale of economic ruin, in which a <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/13547/did-midas-write-the-future" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1987, Michael M. Thomas, my former colleague at The New York Observer, published &#8220;The Ropespinner Conspiracy.&#8221;</p>
<p>The title derives from a remark attributed to Lenin, &#8220;The capitalists will sell us the rope with which to hang them.&#8221; The book is a twisted tale of economic ruin, in which a banker working within the system destroys U.S. capitalism by wrecking the internal infrastructure of Wall Street.</p>
<p>Sound familiar?<span id="more-13547"></span></p>
<p>Well, it did to Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne, who remembered the novel when having lunch with our editor recently. This prompted me to call my old friend Thomas, who&#8217;s best known for his brilliant &#8220;The Midas Watch&#8221; column in the Observer, to see if he felt vindicated by having more or less predicted the collapse of the U.S. banking system more than 20 years ago.</p>
<p>&#8220;The book is how a banker brought down capitalism by doing what banks were doing then, like making third-world loans and a bunch of other stuff I quite frankly can&#8217;t remember,&#8221; said the 72-year-old Thomas from his home in Brooklyn Heights.</p>
<p>&#8220;You could argue that subprime mortgages were essentially third-world loans. The third world doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to be in Southeast Asia or Sub-Saharan Africa. It could be in Ohio along Lake Erie or in the Deep South, where people are sinking into insolvency.</p>
<p>&#8220;It doesn&#8217;t surprise me how Wall Street connives it&#8217;s own destruction,&#8221; Thomas continued. &#8220;The one thing I think no one expected would be the ripples created by this kind of tsunami and how quickly they&#8217;ve spread.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/13547/did-midas-write-the-future/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

