<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; tv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Palin the Celebrity</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41275/palin-the-celebrity</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/41275/palin-the-celebrity#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Chopper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levi johnston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County Choppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Teutul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OK, it&#8217;s possible to read too much into <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20275559,00.html?xid=rss-topheadlines">this news</a>. Or, more properly, &#8220;news.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Alaska Governor Sarah Palin recently welcomed the crew from Orange County Choppers – whose custom motorcycle business is featured on TLC&#8217;s <em>American Chopper</em> – to Anchorage where show star Paul Teutul Sr. researched building a</p></blockquote><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/41275/palin-the-celebrity" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, it&#8217;s possible to read too much into <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20275559,00.html?xid=rss-topheadlines">this news</a>. Or, more properly, &#8220;news.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>Alaska Governor Sarah Palin recently welcomed the crew from Orange County Choppers – whose custom motorcycle business is featured on TLC&#8217;s <em>American Chopper</em> – to Anchorage where show star Paul Teutul Sr. researched building a bike to honor Alaska&#8217;s 50-year anniversary of being a state.</p>
<p>&#8220;It means so much to the state of Alaska that these guys are building this bike that will honor statehood here,&#8221; Palin says in the episode.</p></blockquote>
<p>With the shrinking of her political action committee and the launch of her legal fund, and her bizarre preference for public statements about her grandson&#8217;s father instead of statements about policy, it really seems like Palin is pulling a Mike Huckabee: transferring her political popularity into a &#8216;roided-up version of her old, fun career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/41275/palin-the-celebrity/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Wins First Legislative Battle of Obama Era</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27871/gop-wins-first-legislative-battle-of-obama-era</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/27871/gop-wins-first-legislative-battle-of-obama-era#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waxman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It may not be big news compared to the stimulus and cabinet confirmations, but congressional Republicans just won their first battle of the Obama administration, defeating a bill that was backed by the president to delay the nationwide switch to digital television.</p>
<p>The vote, which stands to leave <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/162546-Nielsen_6_5_Million_Households_Still_Unready_For_DTV.php">more</a> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/27871/gop-wins-first-legislative-battle-of-obama-era" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may not be big news compared to the stimulus and cabinet confirmations, but congressional Republicans just won their first battle of the Obama administration, defeating a bill that was backed by the president to delay the nationwide switch to digital television.</p>
<p>The vote, which stands to leave <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/162546-Nielsen_6_5_Million_Households_Still_Unready_For_DTV.php">more than 6.5 million households</a> without TV access when the switchover takes place on Feb. 17, was largely along party lines: just 22 Republicans voted for the bill, while 13 Democrats voted against it.</p>
<p><span id="more-27871"></span></p>
<p>The overall vote was 258-168 in favor of the bill, but a two-thirds majority was needed needed for passage because the vote was conducted under a suspension of the rules. This procedure is used for quick passage of noncontroversial bills, as this one appeared to be after the Senate approved it unanimously on Monday.</p>
<p>But House Republicans mounted a fight against the bill, fearing that another four months under the current system could cost broadcasters millions of dollars.</p>
<p>House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) immediately released this statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I am very disappointed the House Republicans blocked the DTV extension today in the House. Their vote has wasted valuable time and will cause needless confusion for consumers. A clear majority in Congress supports postponing the transition and providing assistance to the millions of households that are unprepared. I am working with the Obama Administration and congressional leadership to explore all available options.”</p></blockquote>
<p>At a time when Republicans are looking to <a title="http://washingtonindependent.com/27411/republicans-eye-gillibrand-house-seat" href="http://washingtonindependent.com/27411/republicans-eye-gillibrand-house-seat" target="_blank">every potential minor victory</a> as a sign of a turning tide, the defeat of this bill represents a tangible, if slightly baffling, success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/27871/gop-wins-first-legislative-battle-of-obama-era/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Paradox: DC-Area Folk Watched Inauguration on TV; Liberal West Coast Didn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/26564/nielsen-paradox-dc-area-folk-watched-inauguration-on-tv-others-didnt</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/26564/nielsen-paradox-dc-area-folk-watched-inauguration-on-tv-others-didnt#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nielsen ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raleigh-durham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington dc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=26564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something counterintuitive: the closer a person lives to Washington, D.C., the more likely it is that he or she watched the inauguration on television.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/">Nielsen released its numbers</a> for the top 56 media markets in the country today. These metropolitan areas had the highest inauguration viewership yesterday:<span id="more-26564"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/top-markets.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-26566" title="top-markets" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/top-markets.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="170" /></a> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/26564/nielsen-paradox-dc-area-folk-watched-inauguration-on-tv-others-didnt" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something counterintuitive: the closer a person lives to Washington, D.C., the more likely it is that he or she watched the inauguration on television.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/obama-inaugural-events-viewed-by-292-in-top-markets/">Nielsen released its numbers</a> for the top 56 media markets in the country today. These metropolitan areas had the highest inauguration viewership yesterday:<span id="more-26564"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/top-markets.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-26566" title="top-markets" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/top-markets.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="170" /></a></p>
<p>And these had the lowest viewership:</p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/lowest-markets.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-26571" title="lowest-markets" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/lowest-markets.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="186" /></a></p>
<p>So people who could most easily come see the inauguration in person &#8212; those from D.C., Maryland, Virginia and North Carolina &#8212; watched from their sofas, while people who live more than 1,000 miles away either made the trek to the capital or didn&#8217;t bother to tune in.</p>
<p>Even stranger, the three metropolitan areas at the bottom of this list are arguably the three most liberal in the country: Seattle, Portland and San Francisco.</p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s possible that people from the D.C. area are simply more politically engaged &#8212; <em>much </em>more engaged &#8212; than their counterparts from farther afield, but this still strikes me as deeply strange.</p>
<p>Anyone have a better explanation? I await your comments &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/26564/nielsen-paradox-dc-area-folk-watched-inauguration-on-tv-others-didnt/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic Stimulus Bill Includes $650 Million for TV Converter Coupons</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/26145/democratic-stim-bill-includes-650-million-for-tv-converter-coupons</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/26145/democratic-stim-bill-includes-650-million-for-tv-converter-coupons#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Beyerstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coupon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=26145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-2.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-26151" title="picture-2" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-2.png" alt="" width="167" height="109" /></a></p>
<p>Last week, the House Democrats unveiled their version of the <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/behindTheScenes/idUKTRE50E7W620090116">$825 billion</a> economic stimulus package.</p>
<p>The proposed bill provides billions of dollars for roads, schools, global warming research, information technology upgrades, food stamps, and unemployment insurance. However, it also allocates more than half a billion dollars for digital-to <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/26145/democratic-stim-bill-includes-650-million-for-tv-converter-coupons" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-2.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-26151" title="picture-2" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/picture-2.png" alt="" width="167" height="109" /></a></p>
<p>Last week, the House Democrats unveiled their version of the <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/behindTheScenes/idUKTRE50E7W620090116">$825 billion</a> economic stimulus package.</p>
<p>The proposed bill provides billions of dollars for roads, schools, global warming research, information technology upgrades, food stamps, and unemployment insurance. However, it also allocates more than half a billion dollars for digital-to analog converter box coupons. From <a title="http://appropriations.house.gov/pdf/RecoveryReport01-15-09.pdf" href="http://appropriations.house.gov/pdf/RecoveryReport01-15-09.pdf" target="_blank">the report accompanying the bill</a> (pdf):<span id="more-26145"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTER BOX PROGRAM</p>
<p>Digital-to-Analog Converter Box Coupons<br />
Recovery funding: $650 million<br />
Funding provides for additional implementation and administration of the digital-to-analog converter box coupon program, including additional coupons to meet new projected demands and consumer support, outreach and administration.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot of money <a href="https://www.dtv2009.gov/">for coupons</a>. To put that figure in perspective, that&#8217;s more than last year&#8217;s entire budget for the <a href="http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/4143/1/308">Occupational Health and Safety Administration</a> (OSHA).</p>
<p>Analog television broadcasts are set to cease Feb. 17, when TV stations drop their analog simulcasts as part of the Congressionally mandated switchover to digital television. The change won&#8217;t affect digital televisions or analog sets hooked up to cable or satellite. However, consumers with analog TVs and &#8220;bunny ears&#8221; will need to buy a digital-to-analog converter box in order to continue receiving free programing.</p>
<p>Even before the stimulus, American households could apply for <a href="http://www.dtv.gov/consumercorner.html#faq1">up to two $40 coupons</a> for the purchase of converter boxes through a program administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The units typically sell for about $40-$70 each. As of May 2008, <a href="http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/012025.html">10 million</a> households had already requested coupons, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. <a href="https://www.ntiadtv.gov/info.cfm">The deadline</a> to apply for a coupon is March 31.</p>
<p>In one sense, the converter box subsidy is a laudably progressive program. By law, all TVs sold in the United States since 2005 must have digital tuners. So, the only people who will benefit from the coupons are those who have older TVs, no cable, and the inclination to apply for their coupons instead of replacing their sets. By far the greatest beneficiaries will be poorer and older Americans, who are less likely to have digital television or cable.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the government has already spent <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/13/AR2009011303060.html">$1.34 billion</a> on the converter box program, according a story in the Washington Post last week. The government has struggled to get coupons out to applicants. The Post reports that 1.7 million people who requested coupons have yet to receive them, and are unlikely to get one before the Feb. 17 transition date.</p>
<p>My question is this: What are they going to spend $650 million additional stimulus dollars on, if there are fewer than two million people on the waiting list, and less than three months left to apply for the coupons?</p>
<p>Only <a href="http://savannahnow.com/node/449023">13 million</a> households in the United States relied exclusively on analog TV without cable, according to a Nielsen study published in early 2008. There may be even fewer today. If 10 million have already applied and all but 1.7 million of those applicants have already gotten their coupons, that means there are fewer than 5 million American households at risk of losing their free TV reception next month. The converter coupons have been available for over a year. So it&#8217;s probably fair to assume that a good chunk of the eligible non-applicants are never going to apply, perhaps because they&#8217;ve already upgraded their TVs, or because they just aren&#8217;t interested. But even if every one of those nearly 5 million households applied for the maximum of two $40 coupons &#8212; an unlikely scenario &#8212; the coupon program would have a total price tag of less than $400 million. The numbers don&#8217;t add up.</p>
<p>Spending an additional $650 million dollars to extend the lives of old televisions seems like a misallocation of resources, relative to other potential targets for stimulus spending. Besides, in terms of &#8220;bang for the buck,&#8221; isn&#8217;t it counterproductive to spend stimulus money on something that will discourage consumers from buying televisions and, you know, <em>stimulating</em> <em>the economy?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/26145/democratic-stim-bill-includes-650-million-for-tv-converter-coupons/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

