<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; Tom Price</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/tom-price/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>GOP Introduces Anti-Grayson Resolution</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/61515/gop-introduces-anti-grayson-resolution</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/61515/gop-introduces-anti-grayson-resolution#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=61515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they weren&#8217;t already busy enough with an anti-Charles Rangel resolution, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) is hoping fellow Republicans will back his resolution admonishing Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.). The text:
Whereas on September 29, 2009, during proceedings on the floor of the House of Representatives, Rep. Alan Grayson from Florida described the Republican health care plan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they weren&#8217;t already busy enough with an <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0909/GOP_drafts_antiRangel_resolution.html?showall">anti-Charles Rangel resolution</a>, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) is hoping fellow Republicans <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/09/why-is-this-necessary.html">will back his resolution </a>admonishing Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.). The text:</p>
<blockquote><p>Whereas on September 29, 2009, during proceedings on the floor of the House of Representatives, Rep. Alan Grayson from Florida described the Republican health care plan as “die quickly”;</p>
<p>Whereas on September 29, 2009, during Rep. Grayson’s speech on the floor of the House of Representatives, he presented a sign for display, which read, “The Republican Health Care Plan: Die Quickly”;</p>
<p>Whereas on September 29, 2009, Rep. Grayson repeatedly stated that “Republicans’ health care plan” was for Americans to “die quickly”;<span id="more-61515"></span></p>
<p>Whereas on September 29, 2009, Rep. Grayson concluded his speech by saying, “Remember, the Republican plan: Don’t get sick. And if you do get sick, die quickly.”</p>
<p>Whereas the conduct of the Representative from Florida was a breach of decorum and degraded the integrity and proceedings of the House;</p>
<p>Now, therefore be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives disapproves of the behavior of the Representative from Florida, Mr. Grayson, during proceedings on the floor of the House of Representatives on September 29, 2009.</p></blockquote>
<p><a style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;" title="View Grays On on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/20433246/Grays-On">Grays On</a> <object id="doc_372014277097076" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="100%" height="500" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="doc_372014277097076" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="play" value="true" /><param name="loop" value="true" /><param name="scale" value="showall" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="devicefont" value="false" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="menu" value="true" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=20433246&amp;access_key=key-8rgi3bm3qy1ph17hctr&amp;page=1&amp;version=1&amp;viewMode=" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="doc_372014277097076" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%" height="500" src="http://d1.scribdassets.com/ScribdViewer.swf?document_id=20433246&amp;access_key=key-8rgi3bm3qy1ph17hctr&amp;page=1&amp;version=1&amp;viewMode=" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" menu="true" bgcolor="#ffffff" devicefont="false" wmode="opaque" scale="showall" loop="true" play="true" quality="high" align="middle" name="doc_372014277097076"></embed></object></p>
<div>
<p>–</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a href="http://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" href="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. </em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/61515/gop-introduces-anti-grayson-resolution/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fear of Fascism, &#8216;Gay Agenda&#8217; Dominates Conservative Kickoff for Midterm Elections</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/61121/fear-of-fascism-gay-agenda-dominate-conservative-kickoff-for-midterm-elections</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/61121/fear-of-fascism-gay-agenda-dominate-conservative-kickoff-for-midterm-elections#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegation coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eagle Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gafney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Take America Back Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midterm elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=61121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Phyllis Schlafly, founder of the Eagle Forum, the conference drew its largest crowd in 38 years, signaling a surge of grass-roots enthusiasm for 2010. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_61120" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 491px"><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/nazi-and-communists.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-61120" title="nazi-and-communists" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/nazi-and-communists.jpg" alt="How to Take Back America Conference, St. Louis (Photo by: David Weigel)" width="481" height="361" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">How to Take Back America Conference, St. Louis (Photo by: David Weigel)</p></div>
<p>ST. LOUIS &#8212; Kitty Werthmann has made quite a career out of warning Americans that fascism is on its way. The 84-year-old native Austrian survived the excesses of the Third Reich and, in her dotage as a leader of the South Dakota branch of the Eagle Forum, recorded tapes and videos explaining just how Hitler took power. She <a id="eag9" title="made her case" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/how-take-back-america-nazis">made her case</a> during George W. Bush&#8217;s presidency, but the audience was small&#8211;fringe conservative activists, radio hosts like Alex Jones. Then came President Barack Obama. On Saturday, at the &#8220;How to Take Back America&#8221; conference, Werthmann found herself speaking to an overflowing room of conservative activists about the parallels between Obama and the rise of Hitler.</p>
<p>&#8220;We had prayer in school before we started class, and after class,&#8221; said Werthmann. &#8220;One day I came into the classroom and the crucifix was gone, and there was Hitler&#8217;s picture, and the Nazi flag on either side. And our teacher said, &#8216;Today we don&#8217;t pray anymore. We sing &#8216;Deutschland, Deutschland Uber Alles.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_27450" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 175px"><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/elephant.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-27450" title="elephant" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/elephant.jpg" alt="Image by: Matt Mahurin" width="165" height="165" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image by: Matt Mahurin</p></div>
<p>The audience of mostly female conservative activists murmured; some of them scrawled out detailed notes, shaking their heads at what they were hearing. It had been a few days since Fox News reported that a New Jersey school had children sing a song of praise to President Obama. They kept on writing and listening as Werthmann explained how Hitler had euthanized mentally handicapped children, and how he&#8217;d kept lists of political enemies.</p>
<p>&#8220;What would you suggest we do,&#8221; asked one activist, &#8220;if we are asked to give up our guns?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t you dare give up your guns!&#8221; thundered Werthmann. &#8220;Never, never, never!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Give them back one bullet at a time!&#8221; called out another activist. The tense atmosphere melted a little bit; the room broke up with laughter.</p>
<p>According to Phyllis Schlafly, founder of the Eagle Forum, the &#8220;How to Take Back America&#8221; conference was the largest summit the group had held in all of its 38 years. Schlafly, who turned 85 in August, moved slowly through the halls of the Hilton St. Louis Frontenac, a 30-minute drive west from the center of the city, as new attendees shook her hand and begged her for autographs and photos. She told TWI that the registration topped 600, beating the previous record of around 300, and the size was overwhelming as hurried hotel staff tried to break down and build up tables for meals, for books, for punch at the end of the day.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kitty has pointed out the parallels between the slow, incremental Hitler takeover of Austria and some of the things that are happening today,&#8221; said Schlafly, asked about Werthmann&#8217;s &#8220;How to Recognize Living Under Nazis and Communists&#8221; session. &#8220;She&#8217;s an expert on that. I see what [Obama] is doing as absolute socialism, as government ownership of the means of production.&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;How to Take Back America&#8221; conference was no place for soft critiques of the Obama administration. It was a weekend of speeches and training sessions that were laden with doom, cries of mounting fascism, and long prayers for salvation. It was the kind of event where Schlafly, a conservative icon who&#8217;s often seen as a leader of the movement&#8217;s far right flank, could take the role of a pragmatist, sticking to the sort of criticism of the Obama administration that might appear on Fox News and asking activists to elect a Republican Congress in 2010. And Schlafly succeeded in bringing big Republican stars to the conference. Former Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-Ark.) was the biggest draw, but six members of Congress attended, too&#8211;Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.), and Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.). Several 2010 Republican candidates hosted workshops, including Ed Martin and Vicky Hartzler, both running for Democratic-held U.S. House seats in Missouri. But some of the rhetoric went beyond partisan politics. At worst, the speakers argued, fascism was on the horizon. At best, this was a pivotal time in a war on Christian values. Some of the speakers split the difference.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you look at the classic model for moving to Marxism,&#8221; said retired Lt. Gen. William Boykin, who would give the conference&#8217;s opening speech, &#8220;you look at what every Marxist organization has done, they nationalize. They redistribute wealth. They restrict gun ownership. They then go out and suppress the opposition. And then, finally, they censor the media.&#8221;</p>
<p>In his speech, Boykin&#8211;who <a id="x6hj" title="has gotten into hot water" href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1004/p13s02-lire.html">has gotten into hot water</a> for speaking out against Islam while in uniform&#8211;begged the audience to pray for their country. &#8220;It&#8217;s only because of intercessory prayer that we haven&#8217;t been hit again since September 11,&#8221; said Boykin. &#8220;Pray for America for 10 minutes a day. If we can mobilize millions of prayer warriors that can pray for 10 minutes a day, we can open the gates of heaven.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the halls and from the stages of the conference, there were constant warnings of fascist, anti-Christian campaigns to break down American morals and sovereignty. Rev. Rick Scarborough, a pastor who advised Mike Huckabee&#8217;s presidential campaign, pounded the podium at his Friday afternoon speech, warning that the president&#8217;s pro-gay agenda was endangering Christians who spoke out against gay rights.</p>
<p>&#8220;The day the president put his hand on the bible,&#8221; said Scarborough, &#8220;his minions were changing official White House Website to reflect a whole new understanding of civil rights, to refer to homosexuals.&#8221; The Bible, said Scarborough, called these people &#8220;sodomites, which no one wants to talk about because it reminds them of their behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some activists followed this up with a breakout session on &#8220;How to Counter the Homosexual Extremist Movement,&#8221; where they learned about transgender awareness days at public schools. And some went to &#8220;How to Stop Feminist and Gay Attacks on the Military,&#8221; where they were informed that upwards of 200,000 active duty members of the military might quit if &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; is repealed.</p>
<p>Those worries about the &#8220;gay agenda&#8221; came in the context of other alleged threats to the Constitution. Frank Gaffney, president of the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, hosted two panel sessions; one on the United Nations, one on &#8220;How to Understand Islam.&#8221; The theme throughout was that &#8220;transnationalists&#8221; of either the Islamic school or the secular school were targeting the Constitution. Conservatives, said Gaffney, could combat this by &#8220;picking fights&#8221; over seemingly obscure issues, and he cited the work he&#8217;d done slowing the nomination for Harold Koh, now the legal advisor to the State Department. Lawyers like Koh, said Gaffney, were dangers to national sovereignty.</p>
<p>&#8220;The North American Union is a real thing,&#8221; said Gaffney. &#8220;It is a real transnational agenda to try to forge out of Mexico, Canada, and the United States, a real competitor to the American Union.&#8221; Beseeching his audience not to treat the NAU as &#8220;black helicopter stuff,&#8221; he claimed the existence of &#8220;something like twenty-five different trilateral working groups, each and every one of which is beavering away at new transnational regulations.&#8221;</p>
<p>The activists, mostly female and Midwestern, but included people who&#8217;d traveled from both coasts, moved in and out of these sessions taking copious notes. Some of them were hearing about this stuff, with this spin, for the first time. &#8220;A lot of people don&#8217;t think the U.N. is any big threat,&#8221; said Karen Clark, an activist from Utah, telling TWI what she&#8217;d learned from Gaffney&#8217;s speech. &#8220;I hadn&#8217;t heard about the two schools of transnationalism before.&#8221;</p>
<p>Off the stage, the fears and conspiracy theories about President Obama grew more obscure. One activist told TWI that Obama may have been &#8220;installed&#8221; after decades of lessons from Communists. Peggy Carter, an Eagle Forum leader from North Carolina, fretted that Obama was &#8220;anti-white,&#8221; and had only stealthily revealed that to Americans because &#8220;he can&#8217;t afford&#8221; to make it obvious.</p>
<p>Some of the most prominent attendees told TWI that they had doubts about the president&#8217;s birth records. Rep. Cynthia Davis, a Republican state legislator in Missouri who has worked with &#8220;birther&#8221; lawyer Orly Taitz for most of this year, said that lawsuits demanding proof of the president&#8217;s citizenship were chiefly about the integrity of the Constitution, and that because Obama&#8217;s father was Kenyan, Obama&#8217;s eligibility problems extended beyond his birth records.</p>
<p>&#8220;Her credibility is questioned because she has an accent,&#8221; said Davis, defending Taitz, &#8220;and yet the reason she has an accent is because she came from a Communist country, and she knows how awful that is, to have a government usurped.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other Republican politicians who&#8217;d gotten in hot water for indulging in &#8220;birther&#8221; jokes or conspiracies led popular breakout sessions. Kris Kobach, a candidate for Kansas secretary of state who had joked that neither Jesus Christ nor Obama had a birth certificate, told TWI that he wouldn&#8217;t bother with the issue if elected in 2010, and expected it to be dealt with in one of the various outstanding lawsuits. Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), who had pondered a lawsuit over the president&#8217;s citizenship, <a title="http://washingtonindependent.com/61111/rep-trent-franks-obama-should-release-long-form-birth-certificate" href="http://washingtonindependent.com/61111/rep-trent-franks-obama-should-release-long-form-birth-certificate" target="_blank">told TWI he had no doubts about Obama&#8217;s citizenship</a>, but suspected that something was being hidden by concealing the original 1961 document on file in Hawaii.</p>
<p>&#8220;President Obama could solve this problem and make the birthers back off by simply showing us his long-form birth certificate,&#8221; said Franks.</p>
<p>Kobach and Franks stayed away from that topic in their sessions. Kobach hosted two, on immigration and on the threats that ACORN and voter registration reform posed to America&#8217;s electoral systems. Franks introduced Maafa 21, a documentary which argues that legal abortion in the United States began as a plot to commit genocide against American blacks. During a short clip from the film&#8211;which Franks said he&#8217;d shown to members of the Congressional Black Caucus&#8211;the congressman quietly commented on the most powerful interviews.</p>
<p>&#8220;When we said we would no longer go to the back of the bus,&#8221; said anti-abortion rights activist Alevda King on the screen, &#8220;there was a place being reserved for us at the abortion clinic.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hear, hear,&#8221; said Franks.</p>
<p>Whenever he got the chance, Franks told activists about his current project, the Susan B. Anthony and Frederick Douglass Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act of 2009, a bill that would make it illegal to perform abortions based on the race or gender of the fetus. By his logic, this could force a lawsuit that would define fetuses as people. Franks, like the other members of Congress who appeared at the conference, tied the cause of Eagle Forum activists to the goals of the founders, of Abraham Lincoln, and of true adherents to the Constitution.</p>
<p>By the close of the conference on Saturday night, the focus had returned to Schlafly. The boisterous, ever-present Christian radio host and conference co-sponsor Janet Porter played a series of clips from the 84-year-old activist&#8217;s career and gave her a prize: the &#8220;American Hero of the Century&#8221; award, a glass eagle with a verse from Isiah scrawled into it. And while his 2008 rival Mitt Romney spoke to the Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference in Michigan, Mike Huckabee flew from New York, where he&#8217;d filmed a new episode of his show, to give a closing speech that paid tribute to Schlafly and all of the ideas that the conservatives in the room had forced into the Republican mainstream. He called for slicing the United Nations off of Manhattan, and said that with the help of conservative activists, he might &#8220;live to see the day&#8221; when abortion is banned in America.</p>
<p>&#8220;God bless you,&#8221; said Huckabee, &#8220;and God bless Phyllis Schlafly most of all.&#8221;</p>
<p>–</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a href="http://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" href="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/61121/fear-of-fascism-gay-agenda-dominate-conservative-kickoff-for-midterm-elections/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>193</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regrets? Joe the Plumber Has a Few</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/61072/regrets-joe-the-plumber-has-a-few</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/61072/regrets-joe-the-plumber-has-a-few#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delegation coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Take Back America Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe the plumber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=61072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samuel &#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221; Wurzelbacher was a late addition to the speaker lineup at the How to Take Back America Conference last weekend in St. Louis, but I don&#8217;t know what the attendees would have done without him. After his short Friday night dinner speech, Wurzelbacher was given a golden wrench and a golden plunger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel &#8220;Joe the Plumber&#8221; Wurzelbacher was a late addition to the speaker lineup at the How to Take Back America Conference last weekend in St. Louis, but I don&#8217;t know what the attendees would have done without him. After his short Friday night dinner speech, Wurzelbacher was given a golden wrench and a golden plunger by Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) and Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa). When the dinner ended, he was mobbed by fans asking for pictures with him. Because he showed up in a T-shirt and jeans &#8212; as he&#8217;s done to every conservative conference I&#8217;ve seen him at &#8212; photos with Wurzelbacher look like they were taken the day he met Barack Obama in his Ohio neighborhood.</p>
<p>When I got a few minutes with Wurzelbacher, I wanted to know: What ever happened to <a href="http://blog.pennlive.com/politics/2009/04/joe_the_plumber_is_joe_the_irs.html">IRSVote.com</a>, the Website where users <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byu8CSCCuv4">were asked to pay $0.99 for a phone call</a> to &#8220;vote the IRS out of business&#8221; and replace the income tax with a FairTax? While the site is still up and running, Wurzelbacher admitted that endorsing the site was probably a mistake.</p>
<p><span id="more-61072"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m learning,&#8221; he said. He started to say something about the people who hound him to endorse their products, but he thought better of it. &#8220;The basics were there for a great idea but they definitely want to do it just for money. And it was sold to me as more of a chance of doing something else. The publicity that they promised never came.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wurzelbacher shrugged. The idea had made sense to him, he said — people will vote for American Idol, so why not something important? But he said he&#8217;d walked away from the project, and his PajamasTV reporting job was only a three-month gig, so the high-profile projects of earlier this year were no more. He had, however, endorsed a conservative comic strip called &#8220;Microman USA,&#8221; which was on sale at the conference.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2516/3961859907_6e0d257fdb.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>The woman right behind Wurzelbacher with the white and black Jacket is Cheryl Eager, a conservative candidate running against Sen. Bob Bennett (R-Utah). The woman right in front is <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/how-take-back-america-nazis">Kitty Werthmann</a>, a South Dakota Eagle Forum leader who led a workshop on the conference on &#8220;How to Recognize Living Under Nazis &amp; Communists.&#8221;</p>
<p>–</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a href="http://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" href="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/61072/regrets-joe-the-plumber-has-a-few/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance Abuses and Obama&#8217;s &#8216;Faulty Anecdote&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/59709/insurance-abuses-and-obamas-faulty-anecdote</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/59709/insurance-abuses-and-obamas-faulty-anecdote#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uninsured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=59709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are smiling this morning about a Wall Street Journal piece claiming that President Obama, in his health reform speech to Congress last week, included a &#8220;faulty anecdote&#8221; about a cancer patient who died as a result of his insurance company dropping coverage after he became sick. Obama claimed:
One man from Illinois lost his coverage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives are smiling this morning about a Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125314896131518267.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">piece</a> claiming that President Obama, in <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/58372/a-passionate-appeal-to-salvage-the-impossible" target="_blank">his health reform speech</a> to Congress last week, included a &#8220;faulty anecdote&#8221; about a cancer patient who died as a result of his insurance company dropping coverage after he became sick. Obama claimed:</p>
<blockquote><p>One man from Illinois lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found that he hadn&#8217;t reported gallstones that he didn&#8217;t even know about. They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it. &#8230; That is heart-breaking, it is wrong, and no one should be treated that way in the United States of America.</p></blockquote>
<p>That anecdote is false, the Journal claims, because &#8220;the efforts of [the patient's] sister and the office of Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan got Mr. Raddatz&#8217;s policy reinstated within three weeks of his April 2005 rescission and secured a life-extending stem-cell transplant for him.&#8221;<span id="more-59709"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Mr. Raddatz died this year,&#8221; the Journal notes, &#8220;nearly four years after the insurance showdown.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), who heads the Republican Study Committee, is patting himself on the back this morning for <a href="http://healthcare.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODllODFiYWZiNDhiMmY3MzNmYWZiYmMyOGYwZTJlZGQ=" target="_blank">having speculated last week</a> that the tale was false. His office issued a statement this morning saying that the incident &#8220;reinforces that President Obama lacks a complete understanding of the American health care system, and further does a disservice to Americans by promoting a health care plan with half-baked anecdotes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not to defend Obama for twisting the tale, which he seems to have done, but both the Journal and Price have downplayed the fact that the patient&#8217;s insurer did in fact drop his coverage when he became sick, and that it took an act of the Illinois attorney general to get that coverage reinstated. Is that really insignificant? After all, how many patients have the option of soliciting such higher ups to get their insurance back? And why should they have to do so?</p>
<p>We wrote <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/59651/house-panel-explores-tragic-clashes-with-private-insurance-bureaucracy" target="_blank">a piece today</a> pointing to a few family members of patients who suffered similar horrors in dealing with the private insurance industry. Do Republicans really want to hang their hats on the defense of an industry that would deny coverage to squeeze a few more dollars to satisfy Wall Street? Seems that they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/59709/insurance-abuses-and-obamas-faulty-anecdote/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questioning the &#8216;Outpouring&#8217; of Opposition to Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/57664/questioning-the-outpouring-of-opposition-to-health-care-reform</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/57664/questioning-the-outpouring-of-opposition-to-health-care-reform#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irax war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Study Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[town halls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=57664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans in Congress have been quick to point to the sometimes-riotous town-hall forums of recent weeks as indication that Americans en masse believe the Democrats&#8217; plans for health care reform to be atrocious. Indeed, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), chairman of the Republican Study Committee, is claiming this morning that President Obama&#8217;s decision to address a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in Congress have been quick to point to the sometimes-riotous town-hall forums of recent weeks as indication that Americans en masse believe the Democrats&#8217; plans for health care reform to be atrocious. Indeed, Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), chairman of the Republican Study Committee, <a href="http://tom.house.gov/html/release.cfm?id=613" target="_blank">is claiming this morning</a> that President Obama&#8217;s decision to address a joint session of Congress on the topic next week is &#8220;clearly a direct response to the outpouring of opposition this past month from the American people.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>While the other side wanted to dismiss these folks as an un-American fringe or political terrorists, the truth is that citizens across this nation do not want Washington taking over our health care system.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a curious argument, if only because the thousands of people coming out to these events, while they represent larger crowds than lawmakers are accustomed to seeing, still make up a tiny fraction of the voting public.<span id="more-57664"></span> Political columnist E.J. Dionne tackles the issue in today&#8217;s Washington Post, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/AR2009090202858.html" target="_blank">arguing</a> that the town halls have seemed much more raucous than most have actually been for the simple reason that outbursts about death panels and socialized medicine make for better TV than quiet discussions about health care policy. The media, Dionne says, are complicit.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is an overwhelming case that the electronic media went out of their way to cover the noise and ignored the calmer (and from television&#8217;s point of view &#8220;boring&#8221;) encounters between elected representatives and their constituents,&#8221; Dionne writes, before pointing out what&#8217;s been ignored in the process.</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the past week, I&#8217;ve spoken with Democratic House members, most from highly contested districts, about what happened in their town halls. None would deny polls showing that the health-reform cause lost ground last month, but little of the probing civility that characterized so many of their forums was ever seen on television.m[…]</p>
<p>The most disturbing account came from Rep. David Price of North Carolina, who spoke with a stringer for one of the television networks at a large town-hall meeting he held in Durham. The stringer said he was one of 10 people around the country assigned to watch such encounters. Price said he was told flatly: &#8220;Your meeting doesn&#8217;t get covered unless it blows up.&#8221; As it happens, the Durham audience was broadly sympathetic to reform efforts. No &#8220;news&#8221; there.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dionne doesn&#8217;t offer any solutions to the timeless trouble of the major media outlets, being businesses, having to cater to the often mindless tastes of television viewers. But as a political strategy, Democrats might tap the logic of Donald Rumsfeld, the former defense secretary, who dismissed those <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2765041.stm" target="_blank">enormous, high-profile protest rallies against the Iraq War</a> by reasoning that more people <em>didn&#8217;t</em> march than did. The same, of course, can be said for the town halls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/57664/questioning-the-outpouring-of-opposition-to-health-care-reform/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Price to Health Subcommittee</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49224/price-to-health-subcommittee</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/49224/price-to-health-subcommittee#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HELP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor and Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roy blunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcommittee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The office of Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) sends over the news that he&#8217;ll be the ranking member on the Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Subcommittee. The subtext is that the party is taking the health care fight more seriously; the previous point man on the issue was Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), who doesn&#8217;t regularly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The office of Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) sends over the news that he&#8217;ll be the ranking member on the Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Subcommittee. The subtext is that the party is taking the health care fight more seriously; the previous point man on the issue was Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), who doesn&#8217;t regularly speak out on the issue and is <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/30363/gop-stimulus-playbook-useless-in-health-care-battle">focused on a 2010 U.S. Senate race</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/49224/price-to-health-subcommittee/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Live from the GOP&#8217;s Anti-Obama Health Care Launch</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48479/live-from-the-gops-anti-obama-health-care-lunch</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/48479/live-from-the-gops-anti-obama-health-care-lunch#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Tax Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives for Patients' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim demint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Capitol Hill right now, Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform is moderating a bicameral &#8220;response&#8221; to President Obama&#8217;s health care push, which heads to ABC News for a TV special tonight. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) are promoting their own health care plans; Rick Scott, the controversial multimillionaire who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Capitol Hill right now, Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform is moderating a bicameral &#8220;response&#8221; to President Obama&#8217;s health care push, which heads to ABC News for a TV special tonight. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) are promoting their own health care plans; Rick Scott, the controversial multimillionaire who runs Conservatives for Patients&#8217; Rights, is sharing a table with the members and with former McCain campaign economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin.</p>
<p>&#8220;A major American company is making a contribution to the Obama administration in the form of an infomercial,&#8221; said Norquist, explaining why they&#8217;d organized the event.</p>
<p>Price marked the administration&#8217;s priorities as a potential &#8220;death knell&#8221; for private health care and worried that positive media coverage of the president was slanting the gameboard. &#8220;If the fourth estate in this administration remains in the tank for this administration,&#8221; he said, attacking ABC News, &#8220;it does endanger the future of our nation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/48479/live-from-the-gops-anti-obama-health-care-lunch/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Bipartisanship on U.N. Human Rights Council</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/37003/no-bipartisanship-on-un-human-rights-council</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/37003/no-bipartisanship-on-un-human-rights-council#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab-israel conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house foreign affairs committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard berman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Study Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[un]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations human rights council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=37003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two parties. Two widely different reactions to the Obama administration&#8217;s announcement Tuesday that the United States will seek a spot on the U.N. Human Rights Council.
Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), who heads the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he &#8220;strongly&#8221; supports the move, arguing that the panel has become &#8220;increasingly dysfunctional and politicized&#8221; and the White [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two parties. Two widely different reactions to the Obama administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/31/AR2009033104115.html">announcement</a> Tuesday that the United States will seek a spot on the U.N. Human Rights Council.</p>
<p>Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), who heads the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he &#8220;strongly&#8221; supports the move, arguing that the panel has become &#8220;increasingly dysfunctional and politicized&#8221; and the White House can work &#8220;to bring about a much-needed overhaul.&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>For too long the United States has sat on the sidelines.  In fact, during the past several years the Council’s pathological focus on demonizing Israel has intensified to the point that genuine human rights crises in Zimbabwe, Sudan and other countries have essentially escaped scrutiny. The time is ripe to take a more positive and active role in challenging the Council and in speaking out about genuine human rights atrocities.</p></blockquote>
<p>And here&#8217;s Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), who heads the Republican Study Committee, claiming that U.S. participation would &#8220;legitimize&#8221; the tyrannical nations on the panel, which has <span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">&#8220;long made Israel a target of its venom.</span></span>&#8220;<span id="more-37003"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Once again, the administration has demonstrated its naïve approach to diplomacy and foreign policy by lifting up tyrants and insulting our allies. This action legitimizes a body that provides diplomatic cover for some of the most abusive regimes in the world. As it is right now, the U.N. Human Rights Council is nothing more than a seal of approval for nations that routinely persecute their own people. Until the Council undertakes significant reforms and demonstrates a real dedication to human rights, I call on President Obama to reverse his decision.</p></blockquote>
<p>OK, so they both agree the council is awful, particularly pertaining to its condemnation of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/featuredCrisis/idUSLQ977827">recent Israeli offensives</a> &#8212; no shocker in a town where any criticism of Israeli policy brings instant charges of anti-Semitism. But the lawmakers&#8217; approaches to the council are instructive: Berman would fix it by joining it; Price would rather ignore it and hope it goes away.</p>
<p>Goes to show that, on some issues, bipartisanship is a long way off.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p><em>TWI is on Twitter. Please follow us <a title="http://twitter.com/WashIndependent" href="http://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/37003/no-bipartisanship-on-un-human-rights-council/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Tom Price on How to Tell If Obama is Failing</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/33782/rep-tom-price-on-how-to-tell-if-obama-is-failing</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/33782/rep-tom-price-on-how-to-tell-if-obama-is-failing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=33782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I asked Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), the head of the Republican Study Committee, two questions about criticisms of President Obama&#8217;s policies that get aired out on business shows. First, what benchmarks should people look at to see whether the stimulus package is working?
&#8220;The benchmarks to watch are those that show that it&#8217;s continuing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week I asked Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), the head of the Republican Study Committee, two questions about criticisms of President Obama&#8217;s policies that get aired out on business shows. First, what benchmarks should people look at to see whether the stimulus package is working?</p>
<p>&#8220;The benchmarks to watch are those that show that it&#8217;s continuing to be more destructive,&#8221; said Price. &#8220;When they continue to throw money out there and inflation begins, then that&#8217;s a telltale sign that they&#8217;re even losing that battle. When the Fed puts out an auction of Treasury notes that they have to fill themselves, that in essence will be a moment of default. That&#8217;s something to watch. And that&#8217;s coming &#8212; that will happen, out of necessity, because you can&#8217;t continue to throw money out there.&#8221;<span id="more-33782"></span></p>
<p>I also asked Price <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/32224/blaming-obama-for-the-dow">when this became the Democrats&#8217; economy</a>: In January 2007? In May 2008? On Inauguration Day?</p>
<p>&#8220;Jan. 20, for sure,&#8221; said Price. &#8220;They owned part of it from the election on, but I think it&#8217;s Jan. 20.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/33782/rep-tom-price-on-how-to-tell-if-obama-is-failing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Tom Price on Whether GOP&#8217;s Goal is Pushing Down Democratic Poll Numbers</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/33190/rep-tom-price-on-whether-gops-goal-is-pushing-down-democratic-poll-numbers</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/33190/rep-tom-price-on-whether-gops-goal-is-pushing-down-democratic-poll-numbers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=33190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a luncheon at the Heritage Foundation today, I asked Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), the leader of the Republican Study Committee, whether he sided with Rep. Patrick McHenry&#8217;s (R-N.C.) comments that the &#8220;goal&#8221; of House Republicans was &#8220;to bring down approval numbers for [Speaker Nancy] Pelosi and for House Democrats.&#8221; Price didn&#8217;t quite agree.
I believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a luncheon at the Heritage Foundation today, I asked Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), the leader of the Republican Study Committee, <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/house-republicans/gop-rep-our-goal-is-to-bring-down-approval-numbers-for-dems/">whether he sided </a>with Rep. Patrick McHenry&#8217;s (R-N.C.) comments that the &#8220;goal&#8221; of House Republicans was &#8220;to bring down approval numbers for [Speaker Nancy] Pelosi and for House Democrats.&#8221; Price didn&#8217;t quite agree.<span id="more-33190"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>I believe we win when we put our best ideas forward and win the debate. I know that&#8217;s what the American people want. I know in my gut the American people don&#8217;t want what&#8217;s going on right now. So our goal, my goal, would be to put forward the positive, optimistic, upbeat forward-thinking, American-based fundamental solutions, and the American people in two or four years will flock to that. This is not where the nation, outside the beltway, wants to go.</p></blockquote>
<p>I asked him to clarify whether he disagreed with McHenry. &#8220;I would prefer to say as we go up their numbers would have to go down, out of necessity, because it’s a finite universe.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/33190/rep-tom-price-on-whether-gops-goal-is-pushing-down-democratic-poll-numbers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
