<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; sharon burke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/sharon-burke/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:00:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Latest CNASer to Join Obama Pentagon Is Natural Resources Wonk</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/70544/latest-cnaser-to-join-obama-pentagon-is-natural-resources-wonk</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/70544/latest-cnaser-to-join-obama-pentagon-is-natural-resources-wonk#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterinsurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharon burke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=70544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration announced this afternoon that Sharon Burke, a vice president of the Center for a New American Security, is headed to the Pentagon as its next director of Operational Energy Plans and Programs. Fitting: Burke pioneered CNAS&#8217;s focus on the role of natural resources in global security issues, announcing it with a bravura [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration announced this afternoon that Sharon Burke, a <a href="http://www.cnas.org/node/64">vice president of the Center for a New American Security</a>, is headed to the Pentagon as its next director of Operational Energy Plans and Programs. Fitting: Burke pioneered CNAS&#8217;s focus on the role of natural resources in global security issues, announcing it with a bravura presentation at CNAS&#8217;s June conference in Washington, and keeping the study visible through its <a href="http://www.cnas.org/blogs/naturalsecurity">Natural Security blog</a>. (Don&#8217;t really know why the blog doesn&#8217;t have anything up on Burke&#8217;s new job.)</p>
<p>All this goes to show that as CNAS becomes more than just the Counterinsurgency Think Tank, its <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/17710/obama">influence</a> reaches beyond that particular are of expertise as well.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;"><br />
</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/70544/latest-cnaser-to-join-obama-pentagon-is-natural-resources-wonk/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Security and Old-Fashioned Natural Resources</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/46628/national-security-and-old-fashioned-natural-resources</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/46628/national-security-and-old-fashioned-natural-resources#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for a New American Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coltan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharon burke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=46628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s Sharon Burke, vice president of Center for a New American Security, who just got effusive praise from former Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), and who&#8217;s presenting a panel on those old atavistic security questions about natural resources. The idea of climate change, for instance, as a national security issue has been much derided, but it&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s Sharon Burke, vice president of Center for a New American Security, who just got effusive praise from former Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), and who&#8217;s presenting a panel on those old atavistic security questions about natural resources. The idea of climate change, for instance, as a national security issue has been much derided, but it&#8217;ll seem a lot less crazy during the Water Wars of 2045. Welcome to Natural Security.<span id="more-46628"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s hard to separate out energy and climate change and how it connects to water and land and biodiversity and other issues,&#8221; Burke says. There are, of course, national security implications for resource use: &#8220;consumption and consequences,&#8221; even if this stuff doesn&#8217;t makes it into the President&#8217;s Daily Brief. The National Intelligence Council&#8217;s 2025 project predicts scarcity, creating &#8220;conflict on a geostrategic level,&#8221; alongside increased natural disasters as the result of climate change.</p>
<p>Look at the demand for materials from increased cellphone use (400 million more Indians and 670 million more Chinese people have cellphones than did in 2000): tantalum, indium, titanium dioxide, and other rare-earth elements. A ton of them are located in China, Burke says, placing the Chinese in a very commanding geostrategic position. Congo has the tantalum, also known as coltan, and it&#8217;s deeply unstable. &#8220;And we don&#8217;t know a whole lot about the global supply chain and how vulnerable it is.&#8221;</p>
<p>Climate change. More &#8220;cyclonic storms of intensity&#8221; like Hurricane Katrina. &#8220;It may drive conflict. It may drive migration. It will certainly drive disaster relief.&#8221; The species that die out take with them &#8220;the ecosystem we depend on. How that&#8217;s going to affect our security is an issue we have to explore.&#8221;</p>
<p>Burke links natural security to Afghanistan. Eighty percent of Afghanistan is agriculture-dependent. The wars, for 30 years, have degraded Afghanistan&#8217;s bio-infrastructure, &#8220;and the land is barren right now,&#8221; and such privation will render difficult any plan from the Obama administration to alleviate the stresses on the Afghan people. Restoring its natural resources is &#8220;critical to restoring security.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;These are security issues right now,&#8221; Burke says, &#8220;and they&#8217;re bound to get worse as climate change proceeds. &#8230; We can either deal with it now and build in resilience or deal with it later and it&#8217;ll be much more difficult.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/46628/national-security-and-old-fashioned-natural-resources/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
