<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; sergei lavrov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/sergei-lavrov/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton, Lavrov Agree to Destroy Tons of Plutonium</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/82125/clinton-lavrov-agree-to-destroy-tons-of-plutonium</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/82125/clinton-lavrov-agree-to-destroy-tons-of-plutonium#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary rodham clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plutonium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sergei lavrov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington nuclear security summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=82125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A nice way to cap off the Washington Nuclear Security Summit from <a href=" Under the agreement we are about to sign, the United States and Russia will each irreversibly and transparently dispose of no less than 34 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium. Together, that is enough material for nearly <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/82125/clinton-lavrov-agree-to-destroy-tons-of-plutonium" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice way to cap off the Washington Nuclear Security Summit from <a href=" Under the agreement we are about to sign, the United States and Russia will each irreversibly and transparently dispose of no less than 34 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium. Together, that is enough material for nearly 17,000 nuclear weapons. And we will put in place the framework and infrastructure needed to dispose of even more plutonium from defense programs in the future.  The agreement provides for monitoring and inspections that will ensure that this material will never again be used for weapons or any other military purpose. By using civil nuclear reactors to dispose of the plutonium, we gain an added benefit – to produce electricity for our people, even as we remove a potential serious danger.">Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under the agreement we are about to sign, the United States and Russia will each irreversibly and transparently dispose of no less than 34 metric tons of weapons-grade plutonium. Together, that is enough material for nearly 17,000 nuclear weapons. And we will put in place the framework and infrastructure needed to dispose of even more plutonium from defense programs in the future.<span id="more-82125"></span></p>
<p>The agreement provides for monitoring and inspections that will ensure that this material will never again be used for weapons or any other military purpose. By using civil nuclear reactors to dispose of the plutonium, we gain an added benefit – to produce electricity for our people, even as we remove a potential serious danger.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/82125/clinton-lavrov-agree-to-destroy-tons-of-plutonium/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S., Russia Agree to Afghanistan Re-Supply Transit Route</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49712/u-s-russia-agree-to-afghanistan-re-supply-transit-route</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/49712/u-s-russia-agree-to-afghanistan-re-supply-transit-route#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyrgyzstan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sergei lavrov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william burns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not been the greatest year for resupplying the Afghanistan war. The Kyrgyzstan government has been <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/32715/on-air-base-kyrgyz-government-is-like-that-katy-perry-song">iffy</a> about allowing the U.S. continued access to the Manas Air Base, a major transit hub, though it&#8217;s looking more like the U.S. military <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/world/asia/24base.html?em">will keep access to Manas</a>. Then there&#8217;s the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49712/u-s-russia-agree-to-afghanistan-re-supply-transit-route" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not been the greatest year for resupplying the Afghanistan war. The Kyrgyzstan government has been <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/32715/on-air-base-kyrgyz-government-is-like-that-katy-perry-song">iffy</a> about allowing the U.S. continued access to the Manas Air Base, a major transit hub, though it&#8217;s looking more like the U.S. military <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/world/asia/24base.html?em">will keep access to Manas</a>. Then there&#8217;s the NATO supply route through Pakistan, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/04/world/asia/04pstan.html">which goes right through Taliban territory</a>. Today in Moscow, though, comes a bit of welcome news: the Russians are allowing transport of &#8220;non-lethal equipment&#8221; to Afghanistan through their territory.</p>
<p>The agreement was concluded by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns. From an official release:<span id="more-49712"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>This agreement will enable the United States to further diversify the crucial transportation routes and decrease the amount of time needed  to move troops and critical equipment to resupply international forces in Afghanistan and to bring needed supplies to the government and people of Afghanistan. This will permit 4,500 flights per year. The new transit routes will save the United States government up to $133 million annually in fuel, maintenance and other transportation costs, and this agreement is free of any air navigation charges.  By providing access to these transit routes, the Russian Federation is enabling a substantial increase in the efficiency of our common effort to defeat the forces of violent extremism in Afghanistan and to ensure Afghanistan’s and the broader region’s security.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/49712/u-s-russia-agree-to-afghanistan-re-supply-transit-route/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

