<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; rolling stone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/rolling-stone/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Biden Probably Wants to Renew His Rolling Stone Subscription</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/87934/biden-probably-wants-to-renew-his-rolling-stone-subscription</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/87934/biden-probably-wants-to-renew-his-rolling-stone-subscription#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterinsurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insubordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kandahar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael hastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolling stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanley mcchrystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform code of military justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=87934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Biden will probably have the last laugh now that Gen. Stanley McChrystal is returning to Washington to learn his fate as commanding general in Afghanistan <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/87922/mcchrystal-apologizes-for-insulting-obama-team-to-magazine">after insulting his civilian bosses and colleagues to Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings</a>. No matter what happens to McChrystal, the article strengthens <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/87934/biden-probably-wants-to-renew-his-rolling-stone-subscription" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Biden will probably have the last laugh now that Gen. Stanley McChrystal is returning to Washington to learn his fate as commanding general in Afghanistan <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/87922/mcchrystal-apologizes-for-insulting-obama-team-to-magazine">after insulting his civilian bosses and colleagues to Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings</a>. No matter what happens to McChrystal, the article strengthens Biden&#8217;s hand in internal administration debates over Afghanistan and Pakistan strategy.<span id="more-87934"></span></p>
<p>Should Obama fire McChrystal, it&#8217;s an opportunity to reorient Afghanistan strategy. Ironically, Hastings recounts Biden thinking McChrystal&#8217;s adjusted plan for Kandahar is &#8220;CT-plus,&#8221; meaning something closer to the counterterrorism-and-Pakistan-centric alternative Biden advocated last fall. I confess I don&#8217;t quite understand how he sees it that way. But it might convince Obama that McChrystal came around to Biden&#8217;s way of thinking anyway. And that no matter what, Afghanistan&#8217;s endgame is a political settlement with a Taliban divorced from al-Qaeda &#8212; a consensus view within the administration, including the senior military leadership &#8212; with Pakistan providing the political guarantees of Taliban compliance. That&#8217;s so Biden!</p>
<p>And if McChrystal ends up keeping his command, he&#8217;s in a chastened political and bureaucratic position. Hastings quotes an anonymous McChrystal aide musing about &#8220;a possibility we could ask for another surge of U.S. forces next summer if we see success here.&#8221; If there&#8217;s one thing McChrystal&#8217;s remarks to the magazine killed, it&#8217;s that. The barely concealed compromise within the Obama strategy for Afghanistan is that after the July 2011 transition to Afghan security control, McChrystal and counterinsurgency get phased down over time, and Lt. Gen. William Caldwell&#8217;s training mission for Afghan security forces gets phased up &#8212; as does Biden&#8217;s desired counterterrorism missions and emphasis on Pakistan. McChrystal and his allies will not be in any position to undo that bargain even if they want to.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether McChrystal should be fired &#8212; there&#8217;s, frankly, a compelling case to be made when considering the Uniform Code of Military Justice&#8217;s penalty of court martial for &#8220;any commissioned officer [using] contemptuous words&#8221; against the civilian chain of command &#8212; my guess is that he won&#8217;t be. Obama summoned McChrystal back to Washington pretty much immediately after the story hit, which suggests that he&#8217;s not thinking about a wholesale revision of his strategy. What&#8217;s more, if he does fire McChrystal, he&#8217;ll have the arduous task of finding new leadership for the war while the clock to July 2011 ticks, introducing new uncertainty among allies and enemies and NATO troops and dealing with another big round of strategy-in-disarray stories. All of which points to McChrystal having to learn to live with Biden &#8212; and the new influence that the general inadvertently gave the vice president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/87934/biden-probably-wants-to-renew-his-rolling-stone-subscription/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smithfield Pork&#8217;s Got Problems</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/40832/smithfield-porks-got-problems</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/40832/smithfield-porks-got-problems#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pig poop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolling stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smithfield foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=40832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If Smithfield Foods, which I wrote about in an <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/40739/swine-flu-may-come-from-corporate-pork-poop">earlier post</a>, rang a bell, it may be because the company has recently gotten some bad press for its troubled labor relations. The problems are heating up with the company&#8217;s latest <a href="http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Smithfield+Foods+to+cut+1,800+jobs,+close+6+plants-a01611795422">announcement</a> that it&#8217;s closing six plants and cutting <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/40832/smithfield-porks-got-problems" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Smithfield Foods, which I wrote about in an <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/40739/swine-flu-may-come-from-corporate-pork-poop">earlier post</a>, rang a bell, it may be because the company has recently gotten some bad press for its troubled labor relations. The problems are heating up with the company&#8217;s latest <a href="http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Smithfield+Foods+to+cut+1,800+jobs,+close+6+plants-a01611795422">announcement</a> that it&#8217;s closing six plants and cutting 1,800 jobs.<span id="more-40832"></span></p>
<p>In March, a local chapter of the Laborers International Union of North America <a href="http://bluevablog.blogspot.com/2009/04/smithfield-foods-faces-more-charges.html">filed labor charges</a> against Smithfield in Virginia, claiming the company has refused to bargain with the union as the company plans to close down one of its hometown plants and transfer some workers to other sites. LIUNA filed more charges in April.</p>
<p>This is hardly the first time Smithfield has had labor conflicts.  In 2007, unions <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/26/us/26immig.html">charged</a> that Smithfield collaborated with immigration authorities who led an immigration raid at its huge North Carolina pork-packing plant. Union officials said Smithfield was trying to discourage its workers from organizing.</p>
<p>Still, nothing tops <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12840743/porks_dirty_secret_the_nations_top_hog_producer_is_also_one_of_americas_worst_polluters">this 2006 Rolling Stone story</a> about Smithfield, which claims that &#8220;America&#8217;s top pork producer churns out a sea of waste that has destroyed rivers, killed millions of fish and generated one of the largest fines in EPA history.&#8221;</p>
<p>As Rolling Stone put it: &#8220;Welcome to the dark side of the other white meat.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/40739/swine-flu-may-come-from-corporate-pork-poop">suspicions about Smithfield&#8217;s pig waste</a> being the source of the swine flu pandemic pan out, the company&#8217;s reputation may soon get even darker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/40832/smithfield-porks-got-problems/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Poses for Leibovitz?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/24884/obama-poses-for-leibovitz</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/24884/obama-poses-for-leibovitz#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew DeLong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john lennon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leibovitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolling stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yoko ono]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=24884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to this morning&#8217;s pool report, renowned celebrity portrait photographer Annie Leibovitz and &#8220;her entourage&#8221; were spotted entering a security tent outside President-elect Barack Obama&#8217;s pre-inaugural Washington home, the Hay-Adams Hotel.</p>
<p>No word yet on whether Leibovitz was there to photograph Obama. However, if she was, Obama presumably kept his <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/24884/obama-poses-for-leibovitz" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this morning&#8217;s pool report, renowned celebrity portrait photographer Annie Leibovitz and &#8220;her entourage&#8221; were spotted entering a security tent outside President-elect Barack Obama&#8217;s pre-inaugural Washington home, the Hay-Adams Hotel.</p>
<p>No word yet on whether Leibovitz was there to photograph Obama. However, if she was, Obama presumably kept his clothes on for the shoot &#8212; unlike some of Leibovitz&#8217;s <a title="http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/johnlennon/articles/story/6478087/behind_the_photo_john_and_yoko" href="http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/johnlennon/articles/story/6478087/behind_the_photo_john_and_yoko" target="_blank">other famous subjects</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/24884/obama-poses-for-leibovitz/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

