<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; Rasmussen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/rasmussen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen poll shows Perry leads by double-digits in Iowa</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/111207/rasmussen-poll-shows-perry-leads-by-double-digits-in-iowa</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/111207/rasmussen-poll-shows-perry-leads-by-double-digits-in-iowa#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 3/Center Well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 iowa caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick perry iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/111207/rasmussen-poll-shows-perry-leads-by-double-digits-in-iowa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Texas Gov. <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/tag/rick-perry">Rick Perry</a> is not only surging across the nation, but is leading the first-in-the-nation caucus state. A new poll by Rasmussen Reports indicates that Perry is now closing in on 30 percent support, with his nearest opponent more than 10 points behind.</p>
<p>Rasmussen polled those likely to <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/111207/rasmussen-poll-shows-perry-leads-by-double-digits-in-iowa" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Gov. <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/tag/rick-perry">Rick Perry</a> is not only surging across the nation, but is leading the first-in-the-nation caucus state. A new poll by Rasmussen Reports indicates that Perry is now closing in on 30 percent support, with his nearest opponent more than 10 points behind.</p>
<p>Rasmussen polled those likely to participate in the Iowa Republican Caucus by telephone, finding that Perry is currently the activists’ first choice with 29 percent. U.S. Rep. <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/tag/michele-bachmann">Michele Bachmann</a> and former Massachusetts Gov. <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/tag/mitt-romney">Mitt Romney</a> are essentially tied for second place with 18 percent, while U.S. Rep. <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/tag/ron-paul">Ron Paul</a> holds 14 percent. No other candidates rose above the 5 percent mark.</p>
<p>One month ago, prior to Perry officially joining the race, Bachmann and Romney were Iowa frontrunners, Paul was third and Perry ranked fourth.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/iowa/iowa_caucus_iowa_gop_perry_29_bachmann_18_romney_17_paul_14">telephone survey</a>, conducted on Aug. 31, polled 862 likely Iowa Republican caucus-goers, and has a 3 point margin of error.</p>
<p>The poll found that Perry has 45 percent support among those who self-identify as part of the tea party movement, and that Romney holds a slight 20 to 24 percent lead among those who do not.</p>
<p>Perhaps most importantly, however, is the fact that only 27 percent of all likely Iowa caucus attendees reported being certain of who they would support. As Rasmussen states, “That leaves plenty of room for opinions to shift, particularly if new candidates enter the race.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/111207/rasmussen-poll-shows-perry-leads-by-double-digits-in-iowa/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen: Voters Support Idea of DREAM Act</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/98160/rasmussen-voters-support-idea-of-dream-act</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/98160/rasmussen-voters-support-idea-of-dream-act#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elise Foley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Bilbray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Authorization Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DREAM act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigrant students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undocumented immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undocumented students]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=98160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Rasmussen poll <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/most_voters_see_college_military_as_ways_for_children_of_illegals_to_become_u_s_citizens" target="_blank">released today</a> shows that in theory, at least, voters should support the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/97658/dream-act-refresher" target="_blank">DREAM Act</a>: Most voters in the poll said children brought to the U.S. illegally should get a chance at citizenship if they complete two years of college or participate in the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/98160/rasmussen-voters-support-idea-of-dream-act" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Rasmussen poll <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/most_voters_see_college_military_as_ways_for_children_of_illegals_to_become_u_s_citizens" target="_blank">released today</a> shows that in theory, at least, voters should support the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/97658/dream-act-refresher" target="_blank">DREAM Act</a>: Most voters in the poll said children brought to the U.S. illegally should get a chance at citizenship if they complete two years of college or participate in the military.<span id="more-98160"></span></p>
<p>A slight majority &#8212; 52 percent &#8212; of likely U.S. voters said children brought to the U.S. illegally who complete two years of college should get a path to legal status, while 36 percent said these children should not be given an opportunity to become citizens.</p>
<p>Voters were more supportive of paths to citizenship for illegal immigrant who serve in the military: 78 percent said children brought to the U.S. illegally who serve in the military should get a chance to become citizens.</p>
<p>Rasmussen also found many voters believe such a bill would encourage illegal immigration. It&#8217;s an argument some Republicans have used, including Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-Calif.) <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/119803-something-to-consider-before-casting-a-vote-for-the-dream-act-rep-brian-bilbray" target="_blank">in an op-ed today</a>. Bilbray linked the DREAM Act and other efforts at so-called &#8220;amnesty&#8221; for illegal immigrants to the death of border-crossers:</p>
<blockquote><p>When my colleagues talk about providing amnesty (or “a pathway to  citizenship”) they become an accessory to these murders. When they  support amnesty, introduce bills that provide a pathway to citizenship  and, in the most irresponsible of cases, use amnesty to motivate voters,  they tell people: ‘work with the cartels and come across our border  illegally, for we will eventually give you amnesty and citizenship.’</p></blockquote>
<p>Widespread support doesn&#8217;t mean the DREAM Act will pass its test this afternoon, of course. The Senate will vote at 2:30 p.m. EST on whether to proceed with the defense authorization bill, to which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid hopes to add the DREAM Act as an amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/98160/rasmussen-voters-support-idea-of-dream-act/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest Poll Shows Vitter Ahead by Double Digits</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/96507/latest-poll-shows-vitter-ahead-by-double-digits</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/96507/latest-poll-shows-vitter-ahead-by-double-digits#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Restuccia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Melancon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Senate race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-term election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=96507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The latest Rasmussen Reports poll shows Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) leading opponent Rep. Charlie Melancon (D-La.) by double digits in the race for the U.S. Senate seat in Louisiana.<span id="more-96507"></span></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/louisiana/election_2010_louisiana_senate">the poll</a>, Vitter would receive 54 percent of the vote and Melancon would receive 33 percent.</p>
<p>Things <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/96507/latest-poll-shows-vitter-ahead-by-double-digits" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest Rasmussen Reports poll shows Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) leading opponent Rep. Charlie Melancon (D-La.) by double digits in the race for the U.S. Senate seat in Louisiana.<span id="more-96507"></span></p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/louisiana/election_2010_louisiana_senate">the poll</a>, Vitter would receive 54 percent of the vote and Melancon would receive 33 percent.</p>
<p>Things don&#8217;t look good for Melancon, even after Vitter weathered a number of high-profile controversies, most recently when a top aide resigned over domestic violence and drunken driving charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/96507/latest-poll-shows-vitter-ahead-by-double-digits/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen: 47 Percent of Country Opposes &#8216;Open Carry&#8217; of Firearms</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/84832/rasmussen-47-percent-of-country-opposes-open-carry-of-firearms</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/84832/rasmussen-47-percent-of-country-opposes-open-carry-of-firearms#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=84832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Our <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/84609/poll-most-americans-oppose-open-carry-of-firearms" target="_blank">recent post</a> on a new poll indicating that more that 52 percent of the country is opposed to allowing the open carry of loaded guns in public has left some readers questioning the integrity of the findings. The survey, some note, was commissioned by the Brady Center <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/84832/rasmussen-47-percent-of-country-opposes-open-carry-of-firearms" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/84609/poll-most-americans-oppose-open-carry-of-firearms" target="_blank">recent post</a> on a new poll indicating that more that 52 percent of the country is opposed to allowing the open carry of loaded guns in public has left some readers questioning the integrity of the findings. The survey, some note, was commissioned by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence (which itself is adamantly opposed to open carry), and it was conducted by Lake Research Partners, a Democratic polling firm.</p>
<p>&#8220;This just in &#8212; a poll conducted on a handful of Cubans by The Castro polling group finds that democracy is bad,&#8221; one commenter wrote.</p>
<p>Fair enough.</p>
<p>Yesterday, Rasmussen &#8212; a conservative polling shop &#8212; <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/gun_control/47_oppose_open_carry_gun_laws_41_favor" target="_blank">released</a> the results of a similar survey. Strangely enough, they came up with similar numbers.<span id="more-84832"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 41% of Adults are at least somewhat concerned about their safety in the presence of those who have “concealed carry” gun permits. Fifty-eight percent (58%) don’t share that concern.</p>
<p>But 47% oppose so-called “open carry” laws that would allow citizens to openly wear their guns in public. Forty-one percent (41%) favor laws. Several states are currently wrestling with this issue.</p></blockquote>
<p>Comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/84832/rasmussen-47-percent-of-country-opposes-open-carry-of-firearms/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen Poll: 49 Percent Back Lawsuits Against Health Care Mandate</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/80093/rasmussen-poll-49-percent-back-lawsuits-against-health-care-mandate</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/80093/rasmussen-poll-49-percent-back-lawsuits-against-health-care-mandate#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=80093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/march_2010/49_support_state_lawsuits_against_health_care_plan">poll</a> goes some way toward explaining why, as I <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/80050/anti-health-care-reform-suits-face-steep-hurdles">report today</a>, ambitious Republican politicians are clambering on board with the idea of lawsuits to repeal the health care individual mandate even though the chances of repeal are slim.</p>
<blockquote><p>Forty-nine percent (49%) of U.S. voters favor their state</p></blockquote><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/80093/rasmussen-poll-49-percent-back-lawsuits-against-health-care-mandate" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/march_2010/49_support_state_lawsuits_against_health_care_plan">poll</a> goes some way toward explaining why, as I <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/80050/anti-health-care-reform-suits-face-steep-hurdles">report today</a>, ambitious Republican politicians are clambering on board with the idea of lawsuits to repeal the health care individual mandate even though the chances of repeal are slim.</p>
<blockquote><p>Forty-nine percent (49%) of U.S. voters favor their state suing the federal government to fight the requirement in the new national health care plan that every American must obtain health insurance.. 37% disagree and oppose their state suing to challenge that requirement. Fourteen percent (14%) are undecided.</p></blockquote>
<p>The mandate doesn&#8217;t poll well in Rasmussen, and never has. Not clear from the poll: whether or not the critics realize it won&#8217;t go into effect until 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/80093/rasmussen-poll-49-percent-back-lawsuits-against-health-care-mandate/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pence 47, Bayh 44</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/74640/pence-47-bayh-44</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/74640/pence-47-bayh-44#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Bayh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=74640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2010/01/25/in-sen-poll-pence-leads-bayh/">Rasmussen poll</a> has Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) trailing Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.)&#8211;rumored to be interested in a challenge, in the wake of the Massachusetts upset&#8211;by only three points.</p>
<p>Bayh, who was on nobody&#8217;s list of endangered Democrats last month, is the sort of senator who found himself <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/74640/pence-47-bayh-44" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2010/01/25/in-sen-poll-pence-leads-bayh/">Rasmussen poll</a> has Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) trailing Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.)&#8211;rumored to be interested in a challenge, in the wake of the Massachusetts upset&#8211;by only three points.</p>
<p>Bayh, who was on nobody&#8217;s list of endangered Democrats last month, is the sort of senator who found himself endangered in last two elections of the Bush presidency. He regularly visits TV studios to state his concerns with the administration&#8217;s policies. But he never really votes against them. Complaints about, for example, how much Congress is spending, are matched with votes for more spending. It&#8217;s a tactic that&#8217;s sapped Bayh&#8217;s credibility with conservatives and angered liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/74640/pence-47-bayh-44/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rasmussen: Coakley by Two Points in Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/73805/rasmussen-coakley-by-two-points-in-massachusetts</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/73805/rasmussen-coakley-by-two-points-in-massachusetts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MA-Sen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ted kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=73805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen Reports, whose poll showing Republican candidate Scott Brown sparked the current round of Democratic panic over the Massachusetts Senate race, <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/massachusetts/election_2010_massachusetts_special_senate_election">is out with a poll</a> showing Democratic candidate Martha Coakley up by only two points. The results, with trends:</p>
<p>Martha Coakley (D) &#8211; 49 (-1)<br />
Scott Brown <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/73805/rasmussen-coakley-by-two-points-in-massachusetts" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasmussen Reports, whose poll showing Republican candidate Scott Brown sparked the current round of Democratic panic over the Massachusetts Senate race, <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/massachusetts/election_2010_massachusetts_special_senate_election">is out with a poll</a> showing Democratic candidate Martha Coakley up by only two points. The results, with trends:</p>
<p>Martha Coakley (D) &#8211; 49 (-1)<br />
Scott Brown (R) &#8211; 47 (+6)</p>
<p>All of that comes after Coakley, roused from what Democrats admit was a fairly lazy campaign, launched new TV ads.</p>
<p><span id="more-73805"></span></p>
<p>The really surprising thing about this poll? While Brown has made his campaign explicitly about the chance Massachusetts voters have to block the health care bill, Rasmussen finds a solid majority of voters in support of the bill. According to the <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/massachusetts/toplines/toplines_massachusetts_special_senate_election_january_11_2010">internals</a>, 52 percent of voters back &#8220;the health care reform plan proposed by President Obama and the congressional Democrats&#8221; to only 46 percent who oppose it. A plurality, 41 percent, of voters say the stimulus package has helped the economy&#8211;only 23 percent say it&#8217;s hurt. Coakley&#8217;s bumbling campaign can&#8217;t close the deal with an electorate that agrees with her on the issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/73805/rasmussen-coakley-by-two-points-in-massachusetts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>58 Percent of U.S. Voters Want to Waterboard Failed Christmas Bomber</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/72914/58-percent-of-u-s-voters-want-to-waterboard-failed-christmas-bomber</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/72914/58-percent-of-u-s-voters-want-to-waterboard-failed-christmas-bomber#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abdulmutallab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nigerian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nigerian bomber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nigerian terror suspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terror suspect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=72914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t expect any charitable feelings around the holidays. According to <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/december_2009/58_favor_waterboarding_of_plane_terrorist_to_get_information" target="_blank">a new Rasmussen national telephone survey</a>, 58 percent of U.S. voters say they&#8217;d support using waterboarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques to extract information from the failed Northwest Airlines Flight 253 bomber.</p>
<p>Just 30 percent oppose using such <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/72914/58-percent-of-u-s-voters-want-to-waterboard-failed-christmas-bomber" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t expect any charitable feelings around the holidays. According to <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/december_2009/58_favor_waterboarding_of_plane_terrorist_to_get_information" target="_blank">a new Rasmussen national telephone survey</a>, 58 percent of U.S. voters say they&#8217;d support using waterboarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques to extract information from the failed Northwest Airlines Flight 253 bomber.</p>
<p>Just 30 percent oppose using such methods on the 23-year-old Nigerian, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who allegedly attempted to blow up a plane en route to Detroit on Christmas Day. Twelve percent are not sure.<span id="more-72914"></span></p>
<p>Male and younger voters are more supportive of aggressive techniques than women and older voters, and Republicans and independents favor using them more than Democrats, Rasmussen reports.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, 71 percent of U.S. voters think that Abdulmutallab should be investigated by military authorities as a terrorist, rather than being treated as a civilian. Only 22 percent say he should be treated as a civilian criminal, which is his current status.</p>
<p>Abdulmutallab <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/72327/handling-of-plane-bombing-suspect-highlights-legal-inconsistencies" target="_blank">has been charged</a> with attempting to blow up an aircraft and kill U.S. civilians by federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of Michigan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/72914/58-percent-of-u-s-voters-want-to-waterboard-failed-christmas-bomber/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polls Show Americans Like Choice More Than Health Care</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/55830/polls-show-americans-like-choice-more-than-health-care</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/55830/polls-show-americans-like-choice-more-than-health-care#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moveon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polling results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Stein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SurveyUSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=55830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to health care, at least, following the polls can be tricky.</p>
<p>Take this latest one<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/20/new-poll-77-percent-suppo_n_264375.html" target="_blank"> Sam Stein reports on for The Huffington Post</a>, showing that 77 percent of Americans think it&#8217;s important to have a &#8220;choice&#8221; between government-run health insurance and private coverage.  That poll <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/55830/polls-show-americans-like-choice-more-than-health-care" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to health care, at least, following the polls can be tricky.</p>
<p>Take this latest one<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/20/new-poll-77-percent-suppo_n_264375.html" target="_blank"> Sam Stein reports on for The Huffington Post</a>, showing that 77 percent of Americans think it&#8217;s important to have a &#8220;choice&#8221; between government-run health insurance and private coverage.  That poll comes <a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693" target="_blank">from Survey USA.</a> Meanwhile, Rasmussen Reports  found <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2009/without_public_option_enthusiasm_for_health_care_reform_especially_among_democrats_collapses">just 34 percent of Americans</a> support a health care reform plan without a public option. Okay &#8212; so far, so good.</p>
<p>So how is it that Rasmussen&#8217;s last poll on health care reform <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2009/support_for_congressional_health_care_reform_falls_to_new_low" target="_blank">found that only 42 percent of voters</a> supported the Democrats&#8217; proposed health reform plan, when that plan still clearly included a &#8220;public option&#8221;? Back then (last week), the whole Democratic proposal for health reform was sinking, leading President Obama and some members of his administration to start backing away from the government-run option and proclaiming their newfound flexibility.<span id="more-55830"></span></p>
<p>Well, <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/toplines/pt_survey_toplines/august_2009/toplines_health_care_august_9_10_2009" target="_blank">that Rasmussen poll</a> referred to the Obama plan as simply &#8220;the health care reform plan proposed by President Obama and the congressional Democrats.&#8221; It seems significant that none of the Rasmussen questions included the word &#8220;choice&#8221; in them. And as pollsters for NBC found earlier this week, without the word &#8220;choice,&#8221; only <a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/NBC-WSJ_Poll.pdf" target="_blank">43 percent</a> of the public favored &#8220;creating a public health care plan administered by the federal government that would compete directly with private health insurance companies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2009/on_health_care_51_fear_government_more_than_insurance_companies" target="_blank">another Rasmussen poll</a> earlier this month found that &#8220;51% of the nation’s voters fear the federal government more than private insurance companies.&#8221; I guess that&#8217;s when they&#8217;re not offered a &#8220;choice&#8221; between the two.</p>
<p>If this confirms anything, it may be that Americans just don&#8217;t like to commit. MoveOn.org, which commissioned <a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693" target="_blank">the SurveyUSA poll</a> and supports the public option, was wise to that.</p>
<p>Still, as Stein notes, when read an actual description of the president&#8217;s health care plan (when it still included the public option), 51 percent of SurveyUSA respondents said they &#8220;favored&#8221; the approach; 43 percent opposed it. Asked the same question <a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/090617_NBC-WSJ_poll_Full.pdf">by NBC and the Wall Street Journal</a>, 53 percent of respondents said they favored the president&#8217;s plan, and 43 percent opposed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/55830/polls-show-americans-like-choice-more-than-health-care/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: 40 Percent of Republicans Reject Palin&#8217;s Decision</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49919/poll-40-percent-of-republicans-reject-palins-decision</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/49919/poll-40-percent-of-republicans-reject-palins-decision#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new Rasmussen Reports <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2012/40_of_gop_voters_say_resignation_hurts_palin_s_chances_in_2012">poll of Republicans</a> finds a 40 percent plurality believing that Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s (R-Alaska) resignation &#8220;hurts her chances of winning the party’s presidential nomination in 2012,&#8221; with only 24 percent saying it helps her. It&#8217;s a sort of meta way to ask about this; these <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49919/poll-40-percent-of-republicans-reject-palins-decision" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new Rasmussen Reports <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2012/40_of_gop_voters_say_resignation_hurts_palin_s_chances_in_2012">poll of Republicans</a> finds a 40 percent plurality believing that Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s (R-Alaska) resignation &#8220;hurts her chances of winning the party’s presidential nomination in 2012,&#8221; with only 24 percent saying it helps her. It&#8217;s a sort of meta way to ask about this; these voters after all, will decide who the nominee is, so it&#8217;s up to them, not the press, whether the decision hurts in the long run. But for two in five Republicans to doubt the logic of someone they were, before this, relatively united in support of, is not a good thing for Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/49919/poll-40-percent-of-republicans-reject-palins-decision/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

