<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; Prince</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/prince/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>John Roberts vs. Michael Jackson</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Savage <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/from-the-white-house-files-a-fight-over-michael-jackson/">digs into the history</a> of a well-remembered visit that Michael Jackson paid to the White House in 1984, and how a 29-year-old associate White House counsel named John Roberts &#8212; yes, that John Roberts &#8212; tried to stop the president from signing a letter congratulating the pop <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Savage <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/from-the-white-house-files-a-fight-over-michael-jackson/">digs into the history</a> of a well-remembered visit that Michael Jackson paid to the White House in 1984, and how a 29-year-old associate White House counsel named John Roberts &#8212; yes, that John Roberts &#8212; tried to stop the president from signing a letter congratulating the pop star. The whole thing&#8217;s a scream, but I lost it at this part:</p>
<blockquote><p>In today’s Post there were already reports that some youngsters were turning away from Mr. Jackson in favor of a newcomer who goes by the name “Prince,” and is apparently planning a Washington concert. Will he receive a Presidential letter? How will we decide which performers do and which do not?</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-48941"></span>This was 1984, when that &#8220;newcomer&#8221; was releasing his sixth album, &#8220;Purple Rain.&#8221; It&#8217;s safe to say John Roberts never partied like it was 1999.</p>
<p>–</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a title="https://twitter.com/WashIndependent" href="https://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts#/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts" href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts#/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/48941/john-roberts-vs-michael-jackson/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

