<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; phil zelikow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/phil-zelikow/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(I Don&#8217;t Want Your) Photograph</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/42916/i-dont-want-your-photograph</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/42916/i-dont-want-your-photograph#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ali soufan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Luban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david mckiernan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial presidency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil zelikow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raymond odierno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=42916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Does President Obama <em>really</em> want to make this argument for why he&#8217;s flip-flopping on the release of the torture photographs:</p>
<blockquote><p>I want to emphasize that these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib</p></blockquote><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/42916/i-dont-want-your-photograph" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does President Obama <em>really</em> want to make this argument for why he&#8217;s flip-flopping on the release of the torture photographs:</p>
<blockquote><p>I want to emphasize that these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the photographs, of course, but this can&#8217;t possibly be true. <span id="more-42916"></span></p>
<p>If the photos are &#8220;not particularly sensational,&#8221; then they wouldn&#8217;t, as Obama went on to say, &#8220;further inflame anti-American opinion and to put our troops in greater danger.&#8221; How can unsensational photographs put troops in danger? Furthermore, at some point, the photos are going to come out &#8212; whether in the near future, as the ACLU is going to press its Freedom of Information Act request, or decades from now, when the time limit on their classification expires. When they&#8217;re released, will Obama really want to stand by describing their contents as &#8220;not particularly sensational&#8221;?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not the only ludicrous aspect of Obama&#8217;s position. &#8220;I fear the publication of these photos may only have a chilling effect on future investigations of detainee abuse,&#8221; he said. What does that even <em>mean</em>? How would someone who investigates torture in the future be anything but helped by releasing the photos? The only potential chilling effect that could occur would concern &#8230; people who torture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/42916/i-dont-want-your-photograph/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lindsey Graham Hunts for a Kitty Dukakis Moment</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/42803/lindsey-graham-hunts-for-a-kitty-dukakis-moment</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/42803/lindsey-graham-hunts-for-a-kitty-dukakis-moment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gitmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guantanamo bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial presidency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil zelikow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=42803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After Philip Zelikow advocates closing Guantanamo Bay, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) &#8212; who, earlier in the hearing, praised President Obama for his &#8220;responsible view&#8221; about Guantanamo &#8212; tries to bait Zelikow with a question about Guantanamo&#8217;s &#8220;recidivism rate.&#8221; (The implication being the<em> Bush Pentagon </em>let dangerous terrorists out of Guantanamo <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/42803/lindsey-graham-hunts-for-a-kitty-dukakis-moment" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Philip Zelikow advocates closing Guantanamo Bay, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) &#8212; who, earlier in the hearing, praised President Obama for his &#8220;responsible view&#8221; about Guantanamo &#8212; tries to bait Zelikow with a question about Guantanamo&#8217;s &#8220;recidivism rate.&#8221; (The implication being the<em> Bush Pentagon </em>let dangerous terrorists out of Guantanamo to immediately return to the fight, so we have to keep the facility open.)</p>
<p>&#8220;There are no reliable statistics on the recidivism rate&#8221; at Guantanamo, Zelikow replies, and allows that there are indications that some unknown number of them have returned to fight. Isn&#8217;t that a &#8220;miscarriage of justice&#8221; then, Graham asks?<span id="more-42803"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Not necessarily,&#8221; Zelikow replies.</p>
<p>&#8220;What if it was your son or daughter?&#8221; Graham demands? How would he feel then?</p>
<p>Zelikow says he wouldn&#8217;t feel any different than when a parolee commits a crime. Graham meekly drops the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/42803/lindsey-graham-hunts-for-a-kitty-dukakis-moment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Khost-Faced Killers</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/42667/khost-faced-killers</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/42667/khost-faced-killers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-pak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ali soufan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khost Province]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil zelikow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=42667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="postContent">
<p>I&#8217;m going to head over to the Dirksen Senate office building pretty soon to cover the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/42481/fbi-agents-account-of-interrogations-conflicts-with-report">Soufan/Zelikow hearings</a>. But before I go: it looks like Khost province, in eastern Afghanistan, is the target of increasing insurgent activity.</p>
<p>It seems like every few days I get a press</p></div><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/42667/khost-faced-killers" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="postContent">
<p>I&#8217;m going to head over to the Dirksen Senate office building pretty soon to cover the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/42481/fbi-agents-account-of-interrogations-conflicts-with-report">Soufan/Zelikow hearings</a>. But before I go: it looks like Khost province, in eastern Afghanistan, is the target of increasing insurgent activity.</p>
<p>It seems like every few days I get a press release from U.S. Forces-Afghanistan about another attack &#8212; successful or thwarted &#8212; in Khost. (Sorry, I don&#8217;t have links for them, they&#8217;re emailed to me.) Yesterday afternoon, U.S. and Afghan forces stopped a suicide attack &#8220;by multiple groups of insurgents,&#8221; including from a suicide bomber &#8220;dressed as&#8221; a member of the Afghan security forces. (Uh, yeah, <em>dressed as.</em>..) The insurgents attacked several municipal buildings in the heart of the city of Khost, taking hostages, and it took about five hours for U.S. and Afghan forces to subdue the assault. That&#8217;s a pretty brazen, complex attack.<span id="more-42667"></span></p>
<p>And it follows an emerging pattern. Earlier that day, if I&#8217;m not misreading another release, an Improvised Explosive Device went off just outside Forward Operating Base Salerno, the headquarters of U.S. forces in the province right on the Pakistan border. April 25: U.S. forces detained a suspected member of the Haqqani and Massoud (that&#8217;s Pakistani Taliban) organizations in the province. April 16: IED turns up in the heart of the district. April 11: Afghan forces find a bomb-rigged vehicle in the Saberi district. April 9: a shootout with insurgents that left a baby dead.  April 4: Joint U.S.-Afghan raid in the Lagharah Valley captures an alleged Taliban commander. I count another 7 such incidents in March.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on in Khost? One explanation is that Task Force Curahee, the unit operating in the province since last April that was built around the 4th Brigade Combat Team of the 101st Airborne &#8212; and which was <a href="../5203/well-see">kind enough to host me on my embed last September</a> &#8212; transitioned out of Khost and adjacent provinces last month. Insurgents may be looking to take advantage of the rotation schedule. Curahee apparently stepped up its own operational tempo in response.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a preliminary guess as I&#8217;m pretty much out the door to cover the Soufan/Zelikow thing. More on this later, but keep an eye on Khost as a locus for insurgent activity. It&#8217;s right on the Pakistan border &#8212; you can literally see Pakistan from Salerno &#8212; and insurgents have been trying to cut U.S. forces off from Kabul by attacking the one road that links the two areas.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/42667/khost-faced-killers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

