<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; palin abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/palin-abortion/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why McCain Likes Obama&#8217;s New &#8216;Lead&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/6366/why-mccain-likes-obamas-new-lead</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/6366/why-mccain-likes-obamas-new-lead#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ari Melber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[08 poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enthusiasm gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin convention orgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swing states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the base]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=6366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The latest national polls show the presidential race settling back to its pre-convention rhythm, with Obama holding what is often reported as a &#8220;small lead,&#8221; or a lead of about five points.  The new <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/17/opinion/polls/main4456249.shtml?source=mostpop_story">CBS</a> headline blares &#8220;<strong>Obama Retakes Lead Over McCain</strong>,&#8221; for example, with a sub-header about his <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/6366/why-mccain-likes-obamas-new-lead" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest national polls show the presidential race settling back to its pre-convention rhythm, with Obama holding what is often reported as a &#8220;small lead,&#8221; or a lead of about five points.  The new <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/17/opinion/polls/main4456249.shtml?source=mostpop_story">CBS</a> headline blares &#8220;<strong>Obama Retakes Lead Over McCain</strong>,&#8221; for example, with a sub-header about his &#8220;5 Point Advantage.&#8221; Now for your reality check:<span id="more-6366"></span></p>
<p><strong>This entire lead is<em> within the margin of error</em>, so by the poll&#8217;s own (flimsy) standard, the candidates are statistically tied. </strong></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t expect that basic fact to ruin a breathless headline, though.  Even when they do reflect statistically significant gaps, national polls are often misleading, because they trump up shifts in the electorate that have little impact on the election. A huge spike in Obama&#8217;s support in California, for example, does nothing for him in November.</p>
<p>There is, however, one potentially significant trend in this new poll. After all the delegation breakfasts and convention speeches ended, it appears that McCain shored up his party base more than Obama. That&#8217;s not surprising. McCain defined his convention by letting the base override his own preferences for a running mate. Ditching Gov. Ridge for Gov. Palin unleashed a multi-day abortion-bashing, media-sniping puritan political orgy. Let There Be Palin, he said, and The Base said it was good.</p>
<p>Since then, McCain&#8217;s support among Republicans jumped 8 points, according to the <a href="http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/09/18/Poll_McCain_less_likely_to_bring_change/UPI-21501221749613/">CBS/NYT poll</a>. In the same period, Obama only gained four points among Democrats.</p>
<p>So while both nominees held <em>exactly 79 percent</em> support among their respective parties before the conventions, McCain has now consolidated his base a bit more.</p>
<p>All the national poll caveats still apply, but this has more electoral impact because battleground states with a Republican edge are more likely to firm up for McCain. See <strong>Florida</strong>, for example, which is now slipping away even though Obama is <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/17/saturating-the-swing-states/">spending more</a> there, and despite his campaign&#8217;s attempt to woo older voters there with trips by both Clintons.</p>
<p>The larger race is still clearly trending Obama&#8217;s way. The economy hurts McCain in Ohio, while mortgages hurt him in the Southwest swing states that he must hold for victory, especially Nevada, which led the country in foreclosures this fall.  So while the &#8220;fundamentals&#8221; of his base constituency are strong, the rest of the electorate is still eyeing change.</p>
<p><em><strong>Update:</strong></em> Commenter &#8220;Total&#8221; writes: &#8220;That&#8217;s not what margin of error means. First off, Obama&#8217;s up 5 and the margin of error is 3, so it&#8217;s not within the margin of error.&#8221; Wrong. The margin of error is <strong>plus or minus 3</strong>, for a spread of six. Thus <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/us/politics/18poll.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=politics&amp;pagewanted=print">The Times</a> reports that Obama&#8217;s apparent lead is &#8220;a difference within the poll’s margin of sampling error.&#8221; Total also recommends an <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_08/014294.php">analysis</a> by Kevin Drum that stresses how these figures essentially turn on probability, so the &#8220;bigger the lead, the more likely that someone is ahead&#8221; &#8212; even if they are technically within the margin of error. We agree on that one.</p>
<p><script src="http://shots.snap.com//client/inject.js?site_name=0" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p><script src="http://shots.snap.com//client/inject.js?site_name=0" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/6366/why-mccain-likes-obamas-new-lead/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Camp: Winning Women, McCain &#8220;Sleazy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/6340/obama-camp-winning-women-mccain-sleazy</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/6340/obama-camp-winning-women-mccain-sleazy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ari Melber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama biden women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what's the matter with kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=6340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Barack Obama is continuing his strong push to target women voters based on issues, according to a new Obama campaign strategy memo, while Sen. John McCain is running &#8220;the sleaziest campaign Americans have ever seen.&#8221;  The memo argues that women will back Obama, regardless of the Palin effect, and <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/6340/obama-camp-winning-women-mccain-sleazy" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Barack Obama is continuing his strong push to target women voters based on issues, according to a new Obama campaign strategy memo, while Sen. John McCain is running &#8220;the sleaziest campaign Americans have ever seen.&#8221;  The memo argues that women will back Obama, regardless of the Palin effect, and that the campaign is shoring up female support this weekend:<span id="more-6340"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>On Friday, Barack Obama, Joe Biden &amp; Jill Biden will hold women’s rallies in battleground states and over the weekend women leaders will be joining with Obama supporters to hold Women for the Change We Need events in all 50 states.  There’s a reason why 53 percent of women voters believe that Obama-Biden better understands the issues and concerns important to women, compared to 35 percent for McCain-Palin, according to a September poll for Emily’s List</p></blockquote>
<p>The Obama campaign argues that this issue domination is largely built on the domestic front, based on choice, health care, equal pay and the economy. Iraq also helps, the memo notes, with &#8220;68 percent of women&#8221; opposing McCain&#8217;s Iraq plan, (according to an Economist poll).</p>
<p>To hammer these advantages, the Obama camp is taking to the soaps.  A new ad <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/burden_ad">campaign</a> targeting women will:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;run during programming with large female audiences, including morning shows, soap operas, daytime TV, cable channels like Lifetime, Oxygen, E!, HGTV, and Bravo and during the fall premieres of several prime time shows.  There will be a companion radio spot that goes up on Tuesday that will be in similar markets and a Web ad appearing on sites that women frequent such as iVillage and magazine sites.</p></blockquote>
<p>Never underestimate the iVillage vote. Seriously, the site gets <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/ivillage.com/?metric=uv">six million</a> visits a month.</p>
<p>Assessing this issue juggernaut, however, a critic might say that if people actually voted on the issues, Republicans would not have won the last two elections. Another critic might add that Republicans lost the popular vote in one of them.</p>
<p>Women may be from Venus but, like men, a lot of them vote like they&#8217;re from Kansas.</p>
<p><script src="http://shots.snap.com//client/inject.js?site_name=0" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p><script src="http://shots.snap.com//client/inject.js?site_name=0" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/6340/obama-camp-winning-women-mccain-sleazy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

