<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; NRDC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/nrdc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Streamlining Endangered Species Rules Might Be Illegal</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/14250/streamlining-endangered-species-rules-may-be-illegal</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/14250/streamlining-endangered-species-rules-may-be-illegal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suemedha Sood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered species act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interior department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=14250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Wetzler, head of the Natural Resources Defense Council&#8217;s endangered species project, has been blogging today about the Bush administration&#8217;s attempt to rush through new rules that could overhaul the Endangered Species Act. In one post, Wetzler argues that the White House&#8217;s actions could be illegal.
The Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Wetzler, head of the Natural Resources Defense Council&#8217;s endangered species project, has been blogging today about the Bush administration&#8217;s <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/14201/200000-letters-in-32-hours">attempt to rush through</a> new rules that could overhaul the Endangered Species Act. In <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/awetzler/one_other_thingdont_forget_abo.html">one post</a>, Wetzler argues that the White House&#8217;s actions could be illegal.<span id="more-14250"></span></p>
<p>The Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service are required to analyze the new rules to make sure they don&#8217;t violate the National Environmental Policy Act. This law requires federal agencies to come up with an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed rule that could harm the quality of the human environment. According to Wetzler, coming up with an EIS is a long and involved process.</p>
<p>In addition, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service have to undertake &#8220;internal&#8221; consultations to determine the rules&#8217; potential effects on species protected by the Endangered Species Act before the rules can be finalized. Yet another involved process, Wetzler says.</p>
<p>The Bush administration hopes to pass its new rules by November. It&#8217;s unclear how it plans to carry out the necessary reviews and consultations in a matter of days without violating any laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/14250/streamlining-endangered-species-rules-may-be-illegal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
