<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; nominee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/nominee/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another GOP Win: TSA Nominee Withdraws</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/74275/another-gop-win-tsa-nominee-withdraws</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/74275/another-gop-win-tsa-nominee-withdraws#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erroll southers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim demint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northwest airlines flight 253]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northwest flight 253]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation security agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withdraw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=74275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the Senate, a nominee for a crucial security agency right after an attempted terror attack<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/72341/tsa-director-nominee-held-up-by-jim-demint"> can be blocked by a single legislator from the minority party because he has a problem not with the nominee but with organized labor</a>. Sensing the possibility to deal a political setback to <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/74275/another-gop-win-tsa-nominee-withdraws" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Senate, a nominee for a crucial security agency right after an attempted terror attack<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/72341/tsa-director-nominee-held-up-by-jim-demint"> can be blocked by a single legislator from the minority party because he has a problem not with the nominee but with organized labor</a>. Sensing the possibility to deal a political setback to the president &#8212; again, without contesting the nominee&#8217;s credentials to run the agency &#8212; others can glom on, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/73392/gop-senators-vs-the-transportation-security-administration">shifting their pretexts for obstruction</a>. All of this is entirely commensurate with the rules of a supermajoritarian senate. And now President Obama&#8217;s nominee, Erroll Southers, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9610631">won&#8217;t be head of the Transportation Security Agency</a> &#8212; <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/72374/why-arent-the-dems-fighting-back-harder-against-demints-tsa-hold">without so much as an angry word from a Senate Democrat</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/74275/another-gop-win-tsa-nominee-withdraws/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Specter Takes a Swipe at John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/48017/specter-takes-a-swipe-at-john-roberts</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/48017/specter-takes-a-swipe-at-john-roberts#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arlen specter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional factfinding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law prof blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election law blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john marshall law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick hasen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=48017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Legal bloggers are abuzz about Sen. Arlen Specter&#8217;s (D-Pa.) swipe at Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in an exacting <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/img/pdfs/090617_Specter.pdf">letter</a> (pdf) Specter sent to nominee Sonia Sotomayor earlier this week about the kind of questions he plans to ask at her confirmation hearing.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://electionlawblog.org/">Rick Hasen of</a> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/48017/specter-takes-a-swipe-at-john-roberts" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal bloggers are abuzz about Sen. Arlen Specter&#8217;s (D-Pa.) swipe at Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in an exacting <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/img/pdfs/090617_Specter.pdf">letter</a> (pdf) Specter sent to nominee Sonia Sotomayor earlier this week about the kind of questions he plans to ask at her confirmation hearing.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://electionlawblog.org/">Rick Hasen of Election Law Blog</a> writes: &#8220;Though the letter is directed to Judge Sotomayor, it takes a not-so-subtle shot at Chief Justice Roberts&#8217; views of congressional power, first as expressed at his Supreme Court confirmation hearings, and then as expressed at the oral argument in NAMUDNO&#8221; &#8212; or <em>Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. Holder</em>, a challenge to the Voting Rights Act that the Supreme Court is getting ready to rule on soon.</p>
<p>The letter, also <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/">discussed in Constitutional Law Prof Blog</a>, essentially accuses Roberts of lying by saying he believes one thing at his confirmation hearing, and then doing another on the bench.<span id="more-48017"></span></p>
<p>Specifically, Specter accuses Roberts of saying in his confirmation hearing that he will defer to the findings of Congress when legislation is challenged in court, and then during oral argument in the recent Voting Rights Act, suggesting that he doesn&#8217;t accept Congress&#8217;s findings when it comes to the need for reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act.</p>
<p>Specter wrote in his letter to Sotomayor:</p>
<blockquote><p>While too much cannot be read into comments by justices at oral argument, Chief Justice Roberts&#8217;s statements suggested a very different attitude on deference to Congressional fact finding than he expressed at his confirmation hearing.</p></blockquote>
<p>How straight an answer Specter will get on his questions about deference to Congressional fact-finding may depend on whether (and how) the Supreme Court has ruled in the voting rights case by the time of Sotomayor&#8217;s confirmation hearing, <a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/">notes Steven Schwinn</a>, contributor to Constitutional Law Prof Blog and a professor at John Marshall Law School.</p>
<p>Sotomayor&#8217;s confirmation hearings are scheduled to begin July 13.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a title="https://twitter.com/WashIndependent" href="https://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts#/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts" href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts#/pages/The-Washington-Independent/214879305716?ref=ts">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/48017/specter-takes-a-swipe-at-john-roberts/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports: Obama to Name Sotomayor as Supreme Court Nominee</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44304/reports-obama-to-name-sotomayor-as-supreme-court-nominee</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/44304/reports-obama-to-name-sotomayor-as-supreme-court-nominee#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew DeLong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Souter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a title="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ij-NlWwXW9S0H8vaLv3jSlAxcmNQD98DU4GO0" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ij-NlWwXW9S0H8vaLv3jSlAxcmNQD98DU4GO0" target="_blank">The Associated Press</a>, NBC News and <a title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/26/AR2009052600889.html" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/26/AR2009052600889.html" target="_blank">The Washington Post</a> are reporting that President Obama will announce this morning that federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor is his choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice David Souter. If confirmed, Sotomayor will be the first Hispanic high court justice <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/44304/reports-obama-to-name-sotomayor-as-supreme-court-nominee" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ij-NlWwXW9S0H8vaLv3jSlAxcmNQD98DU4GO0" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ij-NlWwXW9S0H8vaLv3jSlAxcmNQD98DU4GO0" target="_blank">The Associated Press</a>, NBC News and <a title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/26/AR2009052600889.html" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/26/AR2009052600889.html" target="_blank">The Washington Post</a> are reporting that President Obama will announce this morning that federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor is his choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice David Souter. If confirmed, Sotomayor will be the first Hispanic high court justice in history. Obama is expected to make the announcement at 10:15 a.m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/44304/reports-obama-to-name-sotomayor-as-supreme-court-nominee/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kagan Headed for Confirmation Today</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/34868/kagan-headed-for-confirmation-today</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/34868/kagan-headed-for-confirmation-today#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arlen specter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elana kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solicitor general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=34868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The nomination of Elena Kagan, President Obama&#8217;s nominee for solicitor general &#8212; the government&#8217;s top legal representative in cases before the Supreme Court &#8212; is now being debated on the Senate floor. The Senate is expected to vote on the nomination by the end of today.</p>
<p>Despite some tough questioning <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/34868/kagan-headed-for-confirmation-today" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nomination of Elena Kagan, President Obama&#8217;s nominee for solicitor general &#8212; the government&#8217;s top legal representative in cases before the Supreme Court &#8212; is now being debated on the Senate floor. The Senate is expected to vote on the nomination by the end of today.</p>
<p>Despite some tough questioning about past experience and legal positions by Republicans &#8212; including Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), who today castigated Kagan for opposing military recruiting on college campuses; and Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa), who complained that he hasn&#8217;t been able to get enough information about Kagan&#8217;s views &#8212; she is widely expected to be confirmed, as even Specter acknowledged on the Senate floor today.<span id="more-34868"></span></p>
<p>As <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/29664/few-quibbles-in-kagan-and-perrelli-confirmation-hearing">TWI&#8217;s Kate Klonick has written,</a> Kagan &#8212; a graduate of Princeton and Harvard Law School, a former clerk to  Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, and now Dean of the Harvard Law School &#8212; would be the first female solicitor general in U.S. history.</p>
<p>Kagan is <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/29297/ginsburgs-cancer-surgery-sparks-speculation-about-future-justices">also considered</a> to be a potential future nominee to the Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/34868/kagan-headed-for-confirmation-today/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

