<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; new media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/new-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hating Sam Stein</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/29832/hating-sam-stein</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/29832/hating-sam-stein#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Stein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=29832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post&#8217;s Sam Stein gets three or four scoops before you put in your contacts in the morning, so I wasn&#8217;t surprised that he got to ask a question at President Obama&#8217;s Monday press conference. Apparently, this was a pretty controversial move by the president. The Heritage Foundation <a <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/29832/hating-sam-stein" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post&#8217;s Sam Stein gets three or four scoops before you put in your contacts in the morning, so I wasn&#8217;t surprised that he got to ask a question at President Obama&#8217;s Monday press conference. Apparently, this was a pretty controversial move by the president. The Heritage Foundation <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/02/10/next-question-please/">sneered</a> that &#8220;left-wing blogger Sam Stein&#8221; was on the president&#8217;s call list. According to Ana Marie Cox, Mara Liasson of NPR (who asked a toothless question about bipartisanship) <a href="http://twitter.com/anamariecox/status/1196447545">was</a> &#8220;surprised he didn&#8217;t call on Air America.&#8221; Then <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/10/fleischer-obama-media/">there was former White House spokesman</a> Ari Fleischer on The O&#8217;Reilly Factor.<span id="more-29832"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>FLEISCHER: There are some reporters, you know, in that briefing room, you can imagine, Bill, you get a lot of dot coms and other oddballs who come in there. They’re screened.</p>
<p>O’REILLY: Like the Huffington Post. Now it gets called on.</p>
<p>FLEISCHER: And I used to seat them all in one section. I would call it “Siberia.” And I told the president, “Don’t call on Siberia.”</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;d never know that Stein asked (and elevated) a question that the White House had been dodging, about whether it supported &#8220;truth and reconciliation&#8221; prosecutions of former Bush officials. You&#8217;d think Stein had asked about Alex Rodriguez or something. Nope: <a href="http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2009/02/10/obama-on-a-rod-steroids-tarnishing-an-entire-era/">That</a> was the Washington Post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/29832/hating-sam-stein/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Navy in the Blue-Water Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/27834/the-navy-in-the-blue-water-blogosphere</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/27834/the-navy-in-the-blue-water-blogosphere#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=27834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My love for the <a href="http://blog.usni.org">U.S. Naval Institute&#8217;s blog</a> is second only to my love of Coke Zero. Over the last week, the blog has sparked a far-reaching debate about how the Navy reacts or doesn&#8217;t interact with the blogosphere after a <a href="http://blog.usni.org/?p=885#comment-1568">vice admiral left some comments on a</a> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/27834/the-navy-in-the-blue-water-blogosphere" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My love for the <a href="http://blog.usni.org">U.S. Naval Institute&#8217;s blog</a> is second only to my love of Coke Zero. Over the last week, the blog has sparked a far-reaching debate about how the Navy reacts or doesn&#8217;t interact with the blogosphere after a <a href="http://blog.usni.org/?p=885#comment-1568">vice admiral left some comments on a provocative post about public perceptions of the service.</a> It&#8217;s interesting to watch the discussion unfold. For a cheat sheet, <a href="http://blog.usni.org/?p=931">see here</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>If we on active duty don’t get engaged effectively with new media, and I don’t mean by “information prevention” methods, then we cede any relevant arguments to whoever actually shows up and is effective. Worse, we could shut down the “forceful backup” we should be getting and wind up with silly decisions that cost a lot or drive the sailors crazy.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-27834"></span>Not long ago I had an interesting colloquy with a senior Army officer who was trying to understand how I could consider myself both a reporter and a blogger. A lot of his argument boiled down to noting that I don&#8217;t do my job the way The Washington Post does: I aggregate other people&#8217;s reporting, add my own, and also add analysis, even opinion. It was frustrating to hear that this was considered somehow illegitimate. But later in the back-and-forth it occurred to me that <em>I</em> didn&#8217;t do a very good job making a case for the merits of my style of reporting as a way to inform the public. So it just goes to show you this is a two-way street and people should leave themselves open to new arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/27834/the-navy-in-the-blue-water-blogosphere/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Really, Really Great Pentagon New-Media Idea</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18115/a-really-really-great-pentagon-new-media-idea</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/18115/a-really-really-great-pentagon-new-media-idea#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TroopTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For the past couple years, the Pentagon&#8217;s communications staff has tried to familiarize itself with all Internet traditions, with some frustration. The new-media staff took major strides in outreach to the blogosphere by launching blogger conference calls between military leaders and <a href="http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/a_cheeto_interlude.php">Cheeto dust-encrusted bloggers</a> like myself. They even launched <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/18115/a-really-really-great-pentagon-new-media-idea" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past couple years, the Pentagon&#8217;s communications staff has tried to familiarize itself with all Internet traditions, with some frustration. The new-media staff took major strides in outreach to the blogosphere by launching blogger conference calls between military leaders and <a href="http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/a_cheeto_interlude.php">Cheeto dust-encrusted bloggers</a> like myself. They even launched <a href="http://dodlive.blogspot.com/">DOD Live</a>, their own blog.</p>
<p>But now like-minded individuals have really taken a quantum leap forward. <span id="more-18115"></span>Check out <a href="http://www.trooptube.tv">TroopTube</a>, a video-sharing service recently created to keep deployed troops in touch with the outside world. That&#8217;s not its only function, of course: By sharing troop videos, the Pentagon goes a long way toward getting its message out in a fascinating and immediate way. But as anyone who&#8217;s ever been in an <a href="http://www.armymwr.com/">MWR tent</a> knows, troops downrange <em>really</em> want something cool to watch when they&#8217;re not hitting up their Facebook or MySpace. TroopTube is an excellent and overdue idea, and while I think it was created by Military OneSource, which I <em>think </em>is outside the Pentagon communications directorate, I&#8217;m sure the staff at DOD New Media welcomes this project with open arms and is already looking for that one video where <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXl3Pdxrn-k">the dudes ghostride an MRAP</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/18115/a-really-really-great-pentagon-new-media-idea/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

