<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; monetizing the tax credit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/monetizing-the-tax-credit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Housing Market Madness? A New Push for a Bigger Homebuyer Tax Credit</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/46449/housing-market-madness-a-new-push-for-a-bigger-homebuyer-tax-credit</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/46449/housing-market-madness-a-new-push-for-a-bigger-homebuyer-tax-credit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Kane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher dodd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downpayment assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first time homebuyer tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing and urban development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnny isakson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetizing the tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=46449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Are we really going to go through this again? Immediately after the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development finished putting the final <a href="http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr09-072.cfm">touches </a>on a controversial plan to allow first-time homebuyers to use an $8,000 tax credit as a downpayment on a new home, some in the  Senate <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/46449/housing-market-madness-a-new-push-for-a-bigger-homebuyer-tax-credit" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we really going to go through this again? Immediately after the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development finished putting the final <a href="http://www.hud.gov/news/release.cfm?content=pr09-072.cfm">touches </a>on a controversial plan to allow first-time homebuyers to use an $8,000 tax credit as a downpayment on a new home, some in the  Senate are <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aQmrxrzY0jfE">proposing </a>nearly doubling the credit &#8212; and making it easier for more people to apply for it.<span id="more-46449"></span></p>
<p>You can&#8217;t pin this one on Republicans alone. It&#8217;s true that Sen. <a href="http://isakson.senate.gov/">Johnny Isakson</a> (R-Ga.) came up with the idea to revitalize the proposal, which first <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/us/politics/05stimulus.html">surfaced</a> earlier this year in negotiations over the stimulus package &#8211; -but Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) is a co-sponsor. Coincidentally, I&#8217;m sure, Dodd is in the midst of a tough re-election battle. I&#8217;d imagine offering a $15,000 credit for first-time homebuyers and eliminating any income ceilings so even wealthy people are eligible probably will lpay pretty well in <a href="http://www.greenwichct.org/Home/default.asp">Greenwich.</a></p>
<p>First, a little background. As TWI <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/44050/first-time-home-buyer-program-ripe-for-abuse">reported</a> recently, Congress approved the $8,000 tax credit as a way to jumpstart the housing market, and HUD came up with a plan to allow homebuyers to access the credit immediately for downpayment money. This seemed slightly problematic to many, given the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/42247/risky-mortgage-program-resurfaces-in-congress">long history of fraud and abuse</a> associated with downpayment assistance schemes for government-backed loans. Also, some wondered why the government was helping people who couldn&#8217;t afford downpayments to buy houses, given that having no skin in the game leads to defaults, which was supposed to be one of the lessons learned from the mortgage crisis.</p>
<p>To its credit, HUD came out with revised<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/29/real_estate/tax_credit_as_downpayment/"> guidelines </a>for the program, requiring borrowers to put down some of their own money for the downpayment, along with accessing the credit. And it issued stern warnings to third-party firms that might try to offer bridge loans for the credits at high interest rates.</p>
<p>That should have ended it. But then lawmakers came up with the new idea to increase the size of the credit and open it to everyone. Here&#8217;s how <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-8000-housing-credit-wasnt-enough-so-senators-are-pushing-it-to-15000-2009-6">Clusterstock</a> summarizes it:</p>
<blockquote><p>The government continues its desperate effort to make the cost of dwelling more expensive. There&#8217;s already an $8,000 homebuyer tax credit, but it&#8217;s obviously not done enough, so Senators Johnny Isaacson and Christopher Dodd are <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aQmrxrzY0jfE">proposing to up it to $15,000</a>.</p>
<p>And, perhaps more importantly, they&#8217;re eliminating the income requirements. Under the previous tax credit, a couple had to have a combined income of less than $150,000. Now any upper-middle class homebuyer is eligible, and hopefully this will get the McMansion sales going again.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s just what America needs &#8211; more McMansions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that interest rates are <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2009/06/the-treasury-bond-market-just-cannot-catch-a-break-interest-rates-have-jumped-again-today-after-investors-demanded-a-higher-.html">jumping</a> and the housing market isn&#8217;t exactly soaring. And the Obama administration&#8217;s homeowner rescue plan isn&#8217;t quite <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/business/03mortgage.html">taking off,</a> either. Those are serious problems that need to be addressed. Is handing out a $15,000 tax credit the best way to accomplish that?</p>
<p>If this tax credit expansion passes, look for someone to suggest a way to let borrowers turn it into downpayment money. Then they can buy bigger houses than they probably can afford.</p>
<p>We might not have learned much from the current foreclosure crisis, but at least the <a href="http://www.nahb.org/">builders</a> of all those McMansions will be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/46449/housing-market-madness-a-new-push-for-a-bigger-homebuyer-tax-credit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

