<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; Militancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/militancy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Christine Fair on Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/11789/christine-fair-on-pakistan</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/11789/christine-fair-on-pakistan#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christine fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Militancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=11789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Christine Fair of RAND runs through some of the reasons why militancy has grown in Pakistan despite something like <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/004658.php">$10 billion in mostly military aid coming from the U.S. since 9/11</a>.</p>
<p>She makes a Prince joke (!) about the &#8220;terrorist formerly known as Beitullah Mehsud,&#8221; head of the Pakistani <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/11789/christine-fair-on-pakistan" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine Fair of RAND runs through some of the reasons why militancy has grown in Pakistan despite something like <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/004658.php">$10 billion in mostly military aid coming from the U.S. since 9/11</a>.</p>
<p>She makes a Prince joke (!) about the &#8220;terrorist formerly known as Beitullah Mehsud,&#8221; head of the Pakistani Taliban. Mehsud is launching &#8220;absolutely unprecedented&#8221; attacks on the Inter-Services Intelligence agency of Pakistan, which birthed the Taliban in the 1990s.</p>
<p>There are retaliatory strikes against the Pakistani military around the country emanating from the Federal Administered Tribal Areas. &#8220;What happens in FATA doesn&#8217;t stay in FATA,&#8221;she says.<span id="more-11789"></span></p>
<p>No one reacts, to Fair&#8217;s dissatisfaction. &#8220;What, you don&#8217;t watch commercials?&#8221;</p>
<p>Big laughs.</p>
<p>OK, no laughing matter: &#8220;$13 billion later, we should not be expecting Beitullah Mehsud to be giving interviews to journalists from the BBC,&#8221; Fair says.</p>
<p>Part of the problem is &#8212; contrary to classic counterinsurgency doctrine, which privileges the need for local forces to fight insurgents &#8212; the Frontier Corps of the Pakistani military. These are the same guys who &#8220;still work with the Taliban&#8230; an ongoing problem,&#8221; and one the U.S. hasn&#8217;t been able to solve.  Plus, we&#8217;re returning to &#8220;the ISI working with the Taliban,&#8221; as evidenced by the ISI bombing the Indian Embassy in Kabul.</p>
<p>&#8220;It doesn&#8217;t appear as if Pakistan has strategically abandoned militancy as a tool of foreign policy,&#8221; Fair says. &#8220;And they&#8217;re under attack because of their embrace of the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to say that Pakistan shouldn&#8217;t appease Al Qaeda, but there seems to be not much of a constituency in the country for attacking Al Qaeda because &#8220;most Pakistanis don&#8217;t feel that Al Qaeda is a threat&#8221; to them.</p>
<p>Lessons of the last eight years: Don&#8217;t support the Pakistani Army and expect it to provide either support to civil society or anything more than grudging opposition to Al Qaeda.</p>
<p>So, instead &#8220;forge a real working relationship with the Pakistan Army&#8221; instead of a &#8220;highly-transactional one&#8221; that we currently have. &#8220;We pay them for operations that we don&#8217;t jointly plan and hope they&#8217;ll be executed.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;ll be different?</p>
<p>Fair doesn&#8217;t really say. But we &#8220;have to build at the same time, strategically, the institutions that can support democracy in Pakistan.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/11789/christine-fair-on-pakistan/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

