<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; meritocracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/meritocracy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Executive Compensation Limits? Hardly</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/46749/executive-compensation-limits-hardly</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/46749/executive-compensation-limits-hardly#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meritocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treasury department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street bailout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=46749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just how tough are the Obama administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/tg165.htm">new executive compensation limits</a> for bailed out firms? Well, as a hint, Wall Street sees them as no threat at all. Indeed, The Washington Post today <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/11/AR2009061103860.html">gets a few telling quotes</a> from bankers who are giddy that these are the only <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/46749/executive-compensation-limits-hardly" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just how tough are the Obama administration&#8217;s <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/tg165.htm">new executive compensation limits</a> for bailed out firms? Well, as a hint, Wall Street sees them as no threat at all. Indeed, The Washington Post today <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/11/AR2009061103860.html">gets a few telling quotes</a> from bankers who are giddy that these are the only standards they&#8217;ll be held to.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our people kind of thought it was a non-event,&#8221; one executive of a large bank said. &#8220;There&#8217;s nothing in there that&#8217;s radical. It&#8217;s not like the horrible and unethical action from Congress where they were putting artificial caps on pay or trying to steal back bonuses . . . I don&#8217;t think there are worries about it on Wall Street.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>From another source:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The focus was really on a light touch approach,&#8221; [another] person added, speaking on condition of anonymity because the discussions are ongoing. &#8220;Nobody said the government needs to regulate with a heavy hand, like caps or micromanagement, but that investors needed more tools to increase disclosure and director accountability.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-46749"></span>Indeed, while the new compensation plan targets the top executives and highest-paid employees at the seven companies receiving the most bailout cash, executives at the hundreds of other bailed-out companies will go largely untouched. Example: While the plan places limits on bonuses (as mandated by an amendment passed by Congress earlier in the year), it limits the definition of &#8220;bonus&#8221; to exclude the commissions that send the pay for many traders soaring.</p>
<p>The Obama plan also scraps the $500,000 salary cap the administration had proposed in February for executives of bailed out firms. President Obama <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/obama-details-plan-to-cap-executive-pay/328073">unveiled</a> that cap with the statement that Americans were outraged with &#8220;executives being rewarded for failure.&#8221; Could it be that just four months later the White House no longer sees a problem with rewarding the same failure?</p>
<p>This is what happens <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/25/business/25sorkin.html?_r=1&amp;scp=3&amp;sq=sorkin&amp;st=cse">when Wall Street runs the Treasury</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/46749/executive-compensation-limits-hardly/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Attacks Labor in Alternative Auto Bailout Plan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/21721/gop-attacks-labor-in-alternative-auto-bailout-plan</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/21721/gop-attacks-labor-in-alternative-auto-bailout-plan#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meritocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=21721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Saying the Democrats&#8217; Detroit bailout plan &#8220;guarantees failure at taxpayer expense,&#8221; House Republicans on Wednesday <a href="http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=107322">introduced</a> an alternative blueprint asking union workers to take a pay cut and give up benefits.</p>
<p>The current powers that be &#8212; both in Washington and Detroit &#8212; can&#8217;t be trusted to fix a <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/21721/gop-attacks-labor-in-alternative-auto-bailout-plan" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying the Democrats&#8217; Detroit bailout plan &#8220;guarantees failure at taxpayer expense,&#8221; House Republicans on Wednesday <a href="http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=107322">introduced</a> an alternative blueprint asking union workers to take a pay cut and give up benefits.</p>
<p>The current powers that be &#8212; both in Washington and Detroit &#8212; can&#8217;t be trusted to fix a problem they created, the Republicans say. From the statement out of Rep. John Boehner&#8217;s (R-Ohio) office:<span id="more-21721"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>The only thing crazier than trusting the same management and union officials who got the Big Three into this mess to get them out is trusting a bunch of Washington politicians and bureaucrats &#8212; the very same people who ran up a $455 billion deficit last year.</p></blockquote>
<p>What the Republicans fail to mention is that they are &#8220;the very same people&#8221; referred to here. Indeed, when the GOP took control of Congress in 1994, the federal debt was roughly <a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm">$4.7 trillion</a>. Now it stands above $10 trillion &#8212; with nearly <a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo5.htm">$3 trillion</a> of the new debt amassed between 2000 and 2006, when Republicans controlled the White House and both chambers of Congress. (Another $1.5 trillion has arrived in the last two years under the Democratic-led Congress.)</p>
<p>Funny that no one ever forced a pay cut on these lawmakers for reckless management. In fact, Congress <a href="http://www.bluebloggin.com/2008/01/09/congress-gives-itself-another-pay-raise/">has given itself a pay raise</a> nearly every year this decade.</p>
<p>Meritocracy, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/21721/gop-attacks-labor-in-alternative-auto-bailout-plan/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

