<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; liberal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/liberal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:57:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Urge to Purge</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41045/the-urge-to-purge</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/41045/the-urge-to-purge#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arlen specter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Progressive-around-town Adam Green has set up a Facebook group called &#8220;I support a real progressive against Arlen Specter,&#8221; which is what it sounds like: a place to pledge $25 if a more liberal candidate runs against Specter in the Democratic primary. So far they have 286 members, which would make for $7150, which isn&#8217;t nothing, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progressive-around-town Adam Green has <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/I-support-a-real-progressive-against-Arlen-Specter/76951643702">set up a Facebook group</a> called &#8220;I support a real progressive against Arlen Specter,&#8221; which is what it sounds like: a place to pledge $25 if a more liberal candidate runs against Specter in the Democratic primary. So far they have 286 members, which would make for $7150, which isn&#8217;t nothing, but I&#8217;m more interested in the early adopters:</p>
<p>- Tom Swan, who managed Ned Lamont&#8217;s 2006 Senate campaign.</p>
<p>- Bob Fertik of Democrats.com, who you used to see at every liberal event pushing for the impeachment of former President George W. Bush.<span id="more-41045"></span></p>
<p>- Paul Hogarth of BeyondChron.</p>
<p>- Todd Beeton of MyDD.com.</p>
<p>- John Arovosis of AmericaBlog.com.</p>
<p>So some of the people you&#8217;d expect to join this, but not really a landslide of anti-Specter sentiment. I can think of dozens of prominent progressives who have not joined this particular cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/41045/the-urge-to-purge/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ideology in Your DNA? Not Quite.</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/6598/ideology-in-your-dna-not-quite</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/6598/ideology-in-your-dna-not-quite#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=6598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A story today in the The Los Angeles Times on a study about biology and politics starts with: &#8220;Die-hard liberals and conservatives aren&#8217;t made; they&#8217;re born. It&#8217;s literally in their DNA.&#8221;
Intrigued, I called the study&#8217;s head researcher, Douglas Oxley of the University of Nebraska, to see if he agreed with this conclusion.
&#8220;In some ways [the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story today in the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-sci-politics19-2008sep19,0,6283617.story">The Los Angeles Times</a> on a study about biology and politics starts with: &#8220;Die-hard liberals and conservatives aren&#8217;t made; they&#8217;re born. It&#8217;s literally in their DNA.&#8221;</p>
<p>Intrigued, I called the<a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/918/2"> study&#8217;s </a>head researcher, Douglas Oxley of the University of Nebraska, to see if he agreed with this conclusion.<span id="more-6598"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;In some ways [the study has] been misinterpreted,&#8221; said Oxley. He said that his study didn&#8217;t find a link between DNA and political leanings. &#8220;We could have things happen to us in the womb or later in life that could cause&#8221; physiological and ideological differences.</p>
<p>The study, released yesterday, tested the physiological responses of 46 participants to various threatening images, like bloody faces. It found that people who self-identified as &#8220;in favor of socially protective policies&#8221; responded much more strongly to the stimuli than people who held more liberal views on such issues as welfare, abortion, immigration, gay rights and school prayer.</p>
<p>The researchers concluded that people of different ideological persuasions have divergent physiological reactions, and that people with socially conservative views tend to be more shocked by potentially threatening stimuli.</p>
<p>“Some people have said that we’re calling conservatives &#8216;frightened&#8217; or something along those lines,&#8221; Oxley said. &#8220;And we’re not. All we’re suggesting is that there’s a physiological difference between people who hold one set of political beliefs and people who hold another set of political beliefs.”</p>
<p>The study had its limitations &#8212; the sample size was small and all of the subjects were white Nebraskans &#8212; but it&#8217;s still a small step toward a greater understanding our ever-increasing ideological divide, even if the answer doesn&#8217;t lie in our genes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/6598/ideology-in-your-dna-not-quite/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
