Recognizing his mistake, he repeated it, this time with a head-bobbing cackle straight out of former President George W. Bush’s playbook. Then he shot the crowd a knowing look and corrected himself.

“As the governor of Texas,” Perry continued Friday, as the crowd roared with amusement, “we had the opportunity to meet with a substantial number of international leaders. … It is clear this administration’s … lack of commitment to having a clear foreign policy has put America in jeopardy.”

The swashbuckling 61-year-old was the main attraction in an hour-and-a-half conversation with Aspen Institute President and CEO Walter Isaacson along with four other governors: New Mexico’s Susana Martinez, South Carolina’s Nikki Haley, Virginia’s Bob McDonnell and Wisconsin’s Scott Walker.

He and the others were in town for the Republican Governors Association’s two-day executive roundtable convened by billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch. Despite its liberal reputation, Aspen is increasingly becoming the backdrop for conservative headline makers and, with momentum mounting in the polls, all eyes were on Perry to see whether he’ll make a viable presidential candidate.

Asked point blank if he’s going to run, the governor said he’ll know in three or four weeks.

“I’m going through a thoughtful process. I’m asking the right questions,” he answered, prompted by Isaacson. “I’m basically asking people, ‘Do you think there’s room in this presidential election for a full-throated, unapologetic fiscal conservative? And if you do think there is room, are you going to help?’”

While dodging a direct declaration of his candidacy, Perry didn’t hold back on his thoughts about gay marriage, Lance Armstrong, the economy and his self-perceived foreign policy chops. Nor was the aforementioned slip of the tongue the only verbal fumble that interrupted his smooth-talking spiel.

Despite attempts to distance himself from the last Texas governor who became president, Perry has an uncanny ability to channel many of Bush’s good-ol’-boy swagger, mannerisms and word mangling. His pronunciation of “theater” calls to mind Bush’s obliteration of the word “nuclear.” In Aspen, Perry even coined a new word — “preception” — when “preconception” or “perception” would’ve sufficed.

Yet this candidate is taking a decidedly different tack when it comes to wooing the Grand Old Party. Instead of preaching compassionate conservatism, Perry is preaching firebrand social conservatism.

“I’m pro-life. I’m pro-traditional marriage,”  he said.

But there is a caveat. He repeatedly made it abundantly clear that he is a champion of the 10th Amendment, imploring that the federal government should not decide socially controversial issues.

Take gay marriage, for instance.

“Our friends in New York six weeks ago passed a statute that said marriage can be between two people of the same sex. And you know what? That’s New York, and that’s their business, and that’s fine with me,” he said. “That is their call. If you believe in the 10th Amendment, stay out of their business.”

(Unurprisingly it didn’t take long for his Republican rivals, not in the room, to jump on Perry’s words. “So Gov Perry, if a state wanted to allow polygamy or if they chose to deny heterosexuals the right to marry, would that be OK too?” presidential candidate Rick Santorum would tweet several hours later.)

Perry again invoked the 10th Amendment when asked about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s doping probe that has targeted part-time Aspen resident Lance Armstrong and other elite cyclists.

“The fact of the matter is our federal government is engaged in way too many things that they shouldn’t be involved with at all,” Perry said. “The idea that they’re telling us how to deliver health care. The idea they’re telling us how to educate our children. The idea they’re telling [Gov.] Susana [Martinez] how to build transportation infrastructure in her state [of New Mexico] is just completely and absolutely out of the main line thought of our founding fathers. They had no preception [sic] of what that would look like in 200 years but they knew they wanted to enumerate those powers and have a few powers for the federal government and then leave those powers to the states.”

Finally getting to the point, he declared: “The idea that the FDA is spending your tax money going after Lance Armstrong for something someone said he did in France is an absolute atrocity.”

The nation has better things to do, he said, like strengthening security at the U.S. southern border.

“We are wasting our time as a country having a conversation [about] immigration policy — ‘Do you think it ought to be this or it ought to be that?’ — when the fact is the biggest issue that is facing this country is the absolute abysmal failure of the federal government to secure our border with Mexico,” Perry said. “That’s the issue that we’ve got to address first. You cannot have an immigration policy discussion until you first secure that border. Sharing a 1,200-mile border with Mexico, I know what’s going on there. I just signed a piece of legislation, a budget, that directed $152 million of Texas taxpayer money to our Texas Rangers and other law enforcement to help try to secure the budget because of Washington’s absolute ineptness. The idea that the president of the United States six weeks ago would come to the border with Mexico, to El Paso, to stand up and say the border between the United States and Mexico is safer than it’s ever been is ludicrous on its face.”

Before underscoring immigration, Perry shrugged off the debate over raising the nation’s debt ceiling.

“We’re getting to watch some great political theater in Washington, D.C. That’s basically what’s going on. The fact is I suspect they’ll come up with some deal. But there’s nothing going to change the future of our country until we elect a United States Senate, add to the United States Congress and elect a president that understands how to create jobs in America and the private sector is the only place jobs will be created in this country, period,” he said as hundreds of Republicans in the room cheered.

When an audience member solicited Perry’s thoughts on the Arab Spring, the governor noted he recently met with Latvian Prime Minister Valdis Domrovskis and former Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf, as well as Israeli leaders. Then he took direct aim at President Barack Obama’s foreign policy.

“Our president has been criticized by the left and right as being unwavering, or wavering, or meandering — really hard to identify what his foreign policy is,” Perry said. “Or, he actually does have a belief and does have a clear foreign policy and that foreign policy is that America is not an exceptional country, and that he believes America has been arrogant with the way it has treated the rest of the world and that his ideas about the United States from the standpoint of the rest of the world is ‘Look, we just need to be another country out there and be one amongst equals.’ I don’t know which of those is correct frankly. Either way it is dangerous for America. I happen to think this world needs a strong America. An America that is strong economically and an America that is strong militarily. Our friends need to know that we will be standing with them. The Latvian president who was in my office this week, Walter, does not know where America stands relative to their defense in central Europe.”

It was that kind of a day for Perry. He had the floor and an adoring crowd. The other governors charitably let him steal the spotlight, which Perry did, interrupting them to get in his two cents.

He claimed he never thought about running for president until his wife, Anita, a nurse, sat him down to explain “our country is in trouble.” “Obamacare,” she lamented, was “putting the practice of medicine, the delivery of health care, in jeopardy.” Concerned for the financial future of their 27- and 24-year old sons, Perry said “she said you need to get out of your comfort zone. Your country is in trouble and you need to do your duty. And I listen to my wife,” Perry said.

The crowd clapped and whistled.

The more he went on, the more clear it became that Perry is posturing for a 2012 campaign. After the Freudian slip in which Perry imagined he already was president, Isaacson sounded convinced of it.

“We didn’t have to wait three weeks!” Isaacson exclaimed.

About 10 million Americans experience cancer during their lifetimes, and the medical costs alone topped $78 billion last year, according to the Lance Armstrong Foundation.

The NIH. (Photo Credit: Culhanen)

“Under the Bush administration, federal cancer research funding has remained basically flat as inflation and medical costs increased,” said Sen. John Kerry, speaking about the plan on a media call with Jill Biden and campaign policy director Neera Tanden. Kerry, who noted that he, Obama and Sen. John McCain had all faced family battles with cancer, criticized McCain for voting “against NIH funding” and lamented that the Republican nominee said the NIH was “not effective.”

Asked by a reporter how an Obama-Biden administration would pay for its plan, Kerry said Obama’s broader health care initiative would be funded by rolling back tax cuts for the wealthy. Then he proactively raised Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s nomination speech, saying it was riddled with inaccuracies, and slammed it as “blatantly false.”

On Friday night, an Obama campaign video will be broadcast during the “Stand Up To Cancer Telethon.” Obama’s aides argue that his record demonstrates a longstanding commitment to funding cancer research and treatment:

Obama has spent his career fighting to improve prevention and treatment of cancer. As an Illinois state senator, Obama passed laws to mandate insurance coverage of colorectal cancer examinations, ensure Medicaid coverage for treatment of breast and cervical cancers [and] promote early detection of prostate and testicular cancers,… As U.S. senator, he has fought for increased funding for cancer research, and championed genomics and personalized medicine to identify new and better treatments for cancer and other diseases.

While the Obama campaign tapped major surrogates and senior policy staff to unveil the cancer plan, interest among the traditional media appeared anemic. Only one reporter asked a question during the call — an AP journalist who said he joined late — and the only other question came from a self-described doctor. (It was not clear how he joined the media call or if he was affiliated with the campaign.)

Fighting cancer is not a hot political story, but it’s another task where, as Obama thundered in his nomination speech, Democrats want to use the government to serve the public and Republicans say “you’re on your own.”