<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; lame duck president</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/lame-duck-president/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The White House to Consider Congressional Sentiment? Is Someone Sick?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/20799/the-white-house-to-consider-congressional-sentiment-is-someone-unwell</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/20799/the-white-house-to-consider-congressional-sentiment-is-someone-unwell#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dana perino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lame duck president]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=20799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It needs no mention that the current White House has been among the most unilateral-minded administration&#8217;s in the country&#8217;s history. Indeed, President George W. Bush has bucked Congress on a long list of high-profile legislative proposals &#8212; everything from the farm bill to SCHIP &#8212; while also asserting his right to ignore certain laws already [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It needs no mention that the current White House has been among the most unilateral-minded administration&#8217;s in the country&#8217;s history. Indeed, President George W. Bush has bucked Congress on a long list of high-profile legislative proposals &#8212; everything from the <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/21/america/Bush-Farm-Bill.php">farm bill</a> to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/03/AR2007100300116.html">SCHIP</a> &#8212; while also asserting his right <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/04/30/bush_challenges_hundreds_of_laws/">to ignore certain laws</a> already passed.</p>
<p>It was strange, then, to hear White House spokeswoman Dana Perino today deflect questions about the automaker bailout, claiming that &#8220;it&#8217;s really important to see what kind of support this can get on Capitol Hill.&#8221; From the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/12/20081203-6.html">official transcript</a> of the press conference:<span id="more-20799"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>REPORTER: You don&#8217;t usually talk about which way the wind is blowing on Capitol Hill. What leads you to say &#8212; make a comment that support for this is a mystery?</p>
<p>PERINO: Well, I just, I think that it is. Could anybody here tell me how Capitol Hill is actually going to react to the plans that they put forward? I don&#8217;t think anybody knows.</p>
<p>REPORTER: Well, you usually don&#8217;t talk about the mood up there.</p>
<p>PERINO: Really?</p>
<p>REPORTER: What are you telling &#8212; what is the administration telling its &#8212; telling Republicans about this whole idea of the $34 billion?</p>
<p>PERINO: Well, as I said, we need a chance to look through the plans, Peter, so I don&#8217;t think that we can &#8212; I can answer that for you right now.</p></blockquote>
<p>Further sign, if any were needed, that the White House seems <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/15858/it-must-be-tough-to-be-the-president-when-no-one-in-your-party-wants-you-in-public">to recognize its own irrelevance</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/20799/the-white-house-to-consider-congressional-sentiment-is-someone-unwell/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
