<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; Joe Scarborough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/joe-scarborough/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Scarborough Bets on Cheney, Loses</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dick cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=64839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon, MSNBC&#8217;s Joe Scarborough <a href="http://twitter.com/JoeNBC/status/5075661819">got into a spat</a> on Twitter with Salon&#8217;s Glenn Greenwald. The blogger fired first, making a frustrated point about the former president and vice president.</p>
<p><span id="more-64839"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-64841" title="Picture 93" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Picture-93.png" alt="Picture 93" width="525" height="254" /></p>
<p>Scarborough made a sort of out-of-character attack.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-64840" title="Picture 92" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Picture-92.png" alt="Picture 92" width="511" height="213" /></p>
<p>There aren&#8217;t a lot of polls that ask for <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon, MSNBC&#8217;s Joe Scarborough <a href="http://twitter.com/JoeNBC/status/5075661819">got into a spat</a> on Twitter with Salon&#8217;s Glenn Greenwald. The blogger fired first, making a frustrated point about the former president and vice president.</p>
<p><span id="more-64839"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-64841" title="Picture 93" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Picture-93.png" alt="Picture 93" width="525" height="254" /></p>
<p>Scarborough made a sort of out-of-character attack.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-64840" title="Picture 92" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Picture-92.png" alt="Picture 92" width="511" height="213" /></p>
<p>There aren&#8217;t a lot of polls that ask for public opinion of both Nancy Pelosi  and Dick Cheney, as the former vice president is a has-been who only makes news when launching dishonest attacks about foreign policy. But the June NBC News/Wall Street Journal <a href="http://www.pollingreport.com/C.htm#Cheney%20FAV">poll</a> &#8212; in other words, the poll produced by the company Scarborough works for &#8212; found that only 26 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of Cheney, while 48 percent had a negative opinion of him. The <a href="http://www.pollingreport.com/p.htm">same poll</a> found that 27 percent of Americans had a favorable opinion of Pelosi, while 44 percent viewed her negatively.</p>
<p>So: Cheney&#8217;s net negative rating is -22, while Pelosi&#8217;s is -17. The answer to Scarborough&#8217;s question is &#8220;Cheney.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/64839/joe-scarborough-bets-on-cheney-loses/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Scarborough Takes On the GOP</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/57766/joe-scarborough-takes-on-the-gop</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/57766/joe-scarborough-takes-on-the-gop#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=57766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A head-spinning <a href="http://twitter.com/JoeNBC">series of tweets</a> from the host of &#8220;Morning Joe.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-57766"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57767" title="Picture 101" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-101.png" alt="Picture 101" width="524" height="258" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57768" title="Picture 103" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-103.png" alt="Picture 103" width="496" height="257" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57769" title="Picture 104" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-104.png" alt="Picture 104" width="494" height="221" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57770" title="Picture 105" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-105.png" alt="Picture 105" width="527" height="260" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57771" title="Picture 106" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-106.png" alt="Picture 106" width="495" height="257" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57772" title="Picture 107" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-107.png" alt="Picture 107" width="475" height="157" /></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A head-spinning <a href="http://twitter.com/JoeNBC">series of tweets</a> from the host of &#8220;Morning Joe.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-57766"></span></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57767" title="Picture 101" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-101.png" alt="Picture 101" width="524" height="258" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57768" title="Picture 103" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-103.png" alt="Picture 103" width="496" height="257" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57769" title="Picture 104" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-104.png" alt="Picture 104" width="494" height="221" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57770" title="Picture 105" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-105.png" alt="Picture 105" width="527" height="260" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57771" title="Picture 106" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-106.png" alt="Picture 106" width="495" height="257" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-57772" title="Picture 107" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Picture-107.png" alt="Picture 107" width="475" height="157" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/57766/joe-scarborough-takes-on-the-gop/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Scarborough: Glenn Beck Now Worse Than the Dixie Chicks</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/53069/joe-scarborough-glenn-beck-now-worse-than-the-dixie-chicks</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/53069/joe-scarborough-glenn-beck-now-worse-than-the-dixie-chicks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dixie Chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=53069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The MSNBC host wasn&#8217;t in the studio today when his <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907290011">show&#8217;s pundits pulled apart</a> Glenn Beck&#8217;s remarks that President Obama is a &#8220;racist&#8221; with &#8220;deep-seated hatred for white people.&#8221; (Beck also smeared &#8220;green jobs czar&#8221; Van Jones as a &#8220;communist.&#8221;) But he&#8217;s <a href="http://twitter.com/JoeNBC/status/2910482041">tweeting </a>about it:</p>
<blockquote><p><span><span>Conservatives attacked the</span></span></p></blockquote><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/53069/joe-scarborough-glenn-beck-now-worse-than-the-dixie-chicks" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MSNBC host wasn&#8217;t in the studio today when his <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907290011">show&#8217;s pundits pulled apart</a> Glenn Beck&#8217;s remarks that President Obama is a &#8220;racist&#8221; with &#8220;deep-seated hatred for white people.&#8221; (Beck also smeared &#8220;green jobs czar&#8221; Van Jones as a &#8220;communist.&#8221;) But he&#8217;s <a href="http://twitter.com/JoeNBC/status/2910482041">tweeting </a>about it:</p>
<blockquote><p><span><span>Conservatives attacked the Dixie Chicks for saying much less about President Bush than what Beck said about President Obama.</span></span></p></blockquote>
<p>Scarborough has some credibility here, because he wasn&#8217;t always so sanguine about the Dixie Chicks &#8220;controversy.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-53069"></span></p>
<p>At a 2003 concert in London, the Chicks&#8217;s lead singer/songwriter Natalie Maines said that they were &#8220;ashamed the president of the United States is from Texas.&#8221; That controversy coincided with the opening weeks of the former congressman&#8217;s first show, &#8220;Scarborough Country,&#8221; and Scarborough pounded the country singers relentlessly for having the audacity to attack George W. Bush. From the March 14, 2003 edition of the show:</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<blockquote><p>It appears the <span><span>Dixie Chicks</span></span> are short on southern hospitality when it comes to their southern president. They told fans in England they were ashamed of the president and now their fans ashamed of them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just the latest incident where celebrities are offending their fans by spouting anti-American agendas. And we&#8217;ve seen a parade of Hollywood elites take to the airwaves to dis the war.</p>
<p>But tonight, a refreshing change. You know my next guest, actor Eric Braeden, as Victor Newman from the CBS daytime drama, &#8220;The Young and The Restless.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It went on for weeks. From the April 24, 2003 edition of the show, attacking the singers for appearing on the cover of &#8220;Entertainment Weekly&#8221; in the nude:</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<blockquote><p>Natalie, we ain&#8217;t so proud of you. The Chicks&#8217; outrageous squawk sent their No. 1 single &#8220;Travelin&#8217; Soldier&#8221; traveling right off the charts. And sales of their album dropped like a lead egg. Radio stations boycotted the Chicks&#8217; music. And they began molting under the commercial pressure. First, they released a boilerplate statement acknowledging that they were disrespectful. But they kept after President Bush for his so-called rush to war.</p></blockquote>
<p><span><span>This was a key moment in the early 2000s culture wars, and Scarborough covered it every time he had an excuse to. On a Sept. 12, 2006 episode of &#8220;Scarborough Country,&#8221; the host plugged one upcoming segment as &#8220;The Dixie Chicks&#8217;s stunning new attack on George W. Bush, stunning only because it is such bad PR! Shut up and sing, baby! Shut up and sing!&#8221; In the segment, about Natalie Maines calling President Bush a &#8220;dumb f**k,&#8221; Scarborough gloated at their lack of country radio success.</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span><span>You&#8217;re talking about the leader of the free world, who got reelected by the largest vote count ever in our history. And about the same time, the Dixie checks stopped being able to fill arenas in huge cities like Houston, Texas. So who`s the real dumb &#8212; did you say puck? Who`s the real dump person here? I have to use that.</span></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span><span>So, now Scarborough is saying what Beck said was more offensive than what Maines said. Will we see weeks of coverage of Beck&#8217;s comment on Scarborough&#8217;s morning show? Will he book people who want to punish Beck, as he booked country singers, actors, and radio hosts who were attacking Maines?</span></span></p>
<p>–<br />
<em>You can follow TWI on <a href="http://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" href="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/53069/joe-scarborough-glenn-beck-now-worse-than-the-dixie-chicks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anything You&#8217;d Like to Apologize For, &#8216;Morning Joe?&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/50355/anything-youd-like-to-apologize-for-mr-scarborough</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/50355/anything-youd-like-to-apologize-for-mr-scarborough#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leon panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mislead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterboarding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=50355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/50314/is-leon-panetta-just-mending-fences-with-congressional-democrats">Much remains unclear</a> about the substance of the &#8220;<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/50111/six-members-of-congress-say-panetta-testified-that-cia-misled-congress">significant actions</a>&#8221; that CIA Director Leon Panetta conceded that the agency didn&#8217;t sufficiently brief to Congress. What&#8217;s absolutely crystal clear is that for days on end, MSNBC&#8217;s Joe Scarborough  popped off at the mouth about how the CIA would never ever <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/50355/anything-youd-like-to-apologize-for-mr-scarborough" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/50314/is-leon-panetta-just-mending-fences-with-congressional-democrats">Much remains unclear</a> about the substance of the &#8220;<a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/50111/six-members-of-congress-say-panetta-testified-that-cia-misled-congress">significant actions</a>&#8221; that CIA Director Leon Panetta conceded that the agency didn&#8217;t sufficiently brief to Congress. What&#8217;s absolutely crystal clear is that for days on end, MSNBC&#8217;s Joe Scarborough  popped off at the mouth about how the CIA would never ever never mislead Congress and how House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) &#8220;needs to shut up&#8221; instead of <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43049/pelosi-the-cia-misled-congress-about-torture">saying otherwise</a>.  Just check out this new Media Matters video (after the jump).<span id="more-50355"></span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tw7_lBGKrsA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tw7_lBGKrsA&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>I carry no brief for Pelosi, and Pelosi could indeed be misrepresenting what CIA actually briefed to her, even though the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43143/graham-says-cia-admitted-briefings-error-cia-declines-to-respond">additional questions about its briefing schedule</a> are numerous. But if Scarborough had bothered reading, say, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Ashes-History-Tim-Weiner/dp/0307389006/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1247241419&amp;sr=8-1">an acclaimed history of the CIA,</a> he would immediately see that it&#8217;s extremely well documented that the CIA has <em>often</em> misled Congress about sensitive intelligence programs. Basic due diligence, unfortunately, would get in the way of his preferred storyline, so don&#8217;t expect anything like this latest self-induced humiliation to prompt an on-air reflection of the way &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; operates. The unaccountable ability of some cable TV hosts to just pretend to their audiences like they know what they&#8217;re talking about is really staggering.</p>
<p>–</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a title="https://twitter.com/WashIndependent" href="https://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" href="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/50355/anything-youd-like-to-apologize-for-mr-scarborough/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Real America&#8217; and Palin</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/49662/real-america-and-palin</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/49662/real-america-and-palin#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weigel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=49662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>MSNBC&#8217;s &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; roiled, as most political shows will today, with discussions of Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s (R-Alaska) resignation. And as with most discussion of Palin, it featured well-paid New York or Washington-based pundits explaining why the second member of a Republican ticket that lost Indiana, Ohio and Virginia represented &#8220;real <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/49662/real-america-and-palin" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSNBC&#8217;s &#8220;Morning Joe&#8221; roiled, as most political shows will today, with discussions of Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s (R-Alaska) resignation. And as with most discussion of Palin, it featured well-paid New York or Washington-based pundits explaining why the second member of a Republican ticket that lost Indiana, Ohio and Virginia represented &#8220;real America.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Which vice presidential candidate was taken off the campaign trail and which one was out there drawing thousands of people?&#8221; asked Joe Scarborough. Of course, then-Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) was not <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxEheO2h5q0">&#8220;taken off the trail,&#8221;</a> and as TWI&#8217;s Laura McGann <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/17649/sarah-palin-doesnt-draw-tens-of-thousands">has reported</a>, Palin&#8217;s crowds were always overrated. Scarborough&#8217;s quasi-co-host Mika Brzezinski followed this up by saying Palin represented &#8220;real Americans,&#8221; and that some people in &#8220;urban America&#8221; didn&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p><span id="more-49662"></span></p>
<p>This is fascinating. In 2004, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) lost the presidency with 48.3 percent of the vote, and no one seriously suggested that they represented &#8220;real Americans&#8221; or anything else. As Ben Smith reported after the election, <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1108/Real_America.html">at least 79 percent of Americans now live</a> in urban areas; the people with whose opinion Brzezinski is so concerned represent a demographic and political fringe. Famously, the <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/palins_real_america_voted_big.php">county in North Carolina</a> that Sarah Palin pegged as an outpost of &#8220;real America&#8221; went for Barack Obama over John McCain, by 18 points.</p>
<p>By every metric, Palin is one of the less popular Republican politicians on the national stage: her ticket even carried less of the vote in Alaska (59.4 percent) than the Bush/Cheney ticket carred in 2004 (61.1 percent). And yet mainstream pundits insists that she represents more of the country than the people who won the 2008 election. It&#8217;s quite extraordinary.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p><em>You can follow TWI on <a title="https://twitter.com/WashIndependent" href="https://twitter.com/twi_news" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and <a title="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" href="http://www.facebook.com/washingtonindependent" target="_blank">Facebook</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/49662/real-america-and-palin/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

