<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; inslee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/inslee/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dems Finally Stop Pretending Cash-for-Clunkers Is an Environmental Bill</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/43628/dems-finally-stop-pretending-cash-for-clunkers-is-an-environmental-bill</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/43628/dems-finally-stop-pretending-cash-for-clunkers-is-an-environmental-bill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betty sutton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[braley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dingell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy and commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inslee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waxman markey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=43628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Betty Sutton (D-Ohio) just introduced an amendment to the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43432/and-the-guerrilla-war-begins">Waxman-Markey energy and climate bill</a> to include a &#8220;cash-for-clunkers&#8221; program &#8212; and after having initially billed the proposal as an environmental measure, it looks like Sutton and her fellow Democrats are finally dropping the green label and calling it <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43628/dems-finally-stop-pretending-cash-for-clunkers-is-an-environmental-bill" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Betty Sutton (D-Ohio) just introduced an amendment to the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43432/and-the-guerrilla-war-begins">Waxman-Markey energy and climate bill</a> to include a &#8220;cash-for-clunkers&#8221; program &#8212; and after having initially billed the proposal as an environmental measure, it looks like Sutton and her fellow Democrats are finally dropping the green label and calling it what it is: a stimulus for the sagging auto industry.</p>
<p>The amendment, which would provide financial incentives for people to trade in their old vehicles for more fuel-efficient ones, arose from a <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers">compromise</a> between two competing cash-for-clunkers bills, one of which was authored by Sutton and both of which contained much stronger environmental standards than the final product.<span id="more-43628"></span></p>
<p>Sutton&#8217;s bill would have required the new vehicle to get at least 27 miles per gallon, while the bill favored by environmentalists would have mandated 25 percent higher fuel efficiency than the average vehicle in its class. The Sutton amendment &#8212; co-sponsored by John Dingell (D-Mich.), Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) and Bruce Braley (D-Iowa) &#8212; requires just a 4-mpg improvement over the old vehicle for passenger cars, as long as the &#8220;clunker&#8221; got no more than 18 mpg. And for large light-duty trucks, a driver is eligible for a $3,500 voucher if he or she upgrades to a vehicle that&#8217;s only 1 mpg more efficient.</p>
<p>The result is that people can receive $3,500 to buy a car that gets just 22 mpg &#8212; this on the same day that President Obama announced <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/43449/us-to-adopt-california-mileage-standards">new regulations</a> that will mandate that cars get 42 miles to the gallon by 2016.</p>
<p>And so in introducing her amendment, Sutton framed it in terms favoring the auto industry, rather than the environment.</p>
<p>&#8220;Over the last few months, auto sales have greatly suffered,&#8221; Sutton said. &#8221; &#8230; This program has the potential to help change that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another sign that the amendment lacks real environmental teeth: it&#8217;s getting broad support from the Republican side of the aisle.</p>
<p><em>Update 4:45 PM</em>: The amendment just passed, with 50 votes in favor, 4 against and 1 present.</p>
<p>–</p>
<p><em>TWI is on Twitter. Please follow us <a title="http://twitter.com/WashIndependent" href="http://twitter.com/WashIndependent" target="_blank">here</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/43628/dems-finally-stop-pretending-cash-for-clunkers-is-an-environmental-bill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Reach Compromise on Cash-for-Clunkers</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Wiener</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for clunkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy and commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inslee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sutton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=41919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>House Democrats have just reached a compromise on a cash-for-clunkers bill that would provide financial incentives for people to trade in their old gas-guzzlers for more fuel efficient vehicles.</p>
<p>From the Energy and Commerce Committee&#8217;s press release:</p>
<blockquote><p><span> </span></p>
<p>Under the agreement, consumers may trade in their old, gas-guzzling vehicles</p></blockquote><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Democrats have just reached a compromise on a cash-for-clunkers bill that would provide financial incentives for people to trade in their old gas-guzzlers for more fuel efficient vehicles.</p>
<p>From the Energy and Commerce Committee&#8217;s press release:</p>
<blockquote><p><span> </span></p>
<p>Under the agreement, consumers may trade in their old, gas-guzzling vehicles and receive vouchers worth up to $4,500 to help pay for new, more fuel efficient cars and trucks.<span> </span>The program will be authorized for up to one year and provide for approximately one million new car or truck purchases.<span> </span>The agreement divides these new cars and trucks into four categories.<span> </span>Miles per gallon figures below refer to EPA “window sticker” values.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in;"><span id="more-41919"></span><span style="font-family: Symbol;"><span>·<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span></span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Passenger Cars</span>:<span> </span>The old vehicle must get less than 18 mpg.<span> </span>New passenger cars with mileage of at least 22 mpg are eligible for vouchers.<span> </span>If the mileage of the new car is at least 4 mpg higher than the old vehicle, the voucher will be worth $3,500.<span> </span>If the mileage of the new car is at least 10 mpg higher than the old vehicle, the voucher will be worth $4,500.</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in;"><span style="font-family: Symbol;"><span>·<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span></span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Light-Duty Trucks</span>:<span> </span>The old vehicle must get less than 18 mpg.<span> </span>New light trucks or SUVs with mileage of at least 18 mpg are eligible for vouchers.<span> </span>If the mileage of the new truck or SUV is at least 2 mpg higher than the old truck, the voucher will be worth $3,500.<span> </span>If the mileage of the new truck or SUV is at least 5 mpg higher than the old truck, the voucher will be worth $4,500.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in;"><span style="font-family: Symbol;"><span>·<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span></span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Large Light-Duty Trucks</span>:<span> </span>New large trucks (pick-up trucks and vans weighing between 6,000 and 8,500 pounds) with mileage of at least 15 mpg are eligible for vouchers.<span> </span>If the mileage of the new truck is at least 1 mpg higher than the old truck, the voucher will be worth $3,500.<span> </span>If the mileage of the new truck is at least 2 mpg higher than the old truck, the voucher will be worth $4,500.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in;"><span> </span></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.5in;"><span style="font-family: Symbol;"><span>·<span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"> </span></span></span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Work Trucks</span>:<span> </span>Under the agreement, consumers can trade in a pre-2002 work truck (defined as a pick-up truck or cargo van weighing from 8,500-10,000 pounds) and receive a voucher worth $3,500 for a new work truck in the same or smaller weight class.<span> </span>There will be a finite number of these vouchers, based on this vehicle class’s market share.<span> </span>There are no EPA mileage measures for these trucks; however, because newer models are cleaner than older models, the age requirement ensures that the trade will improve environmental quality.<span> </span>Consumers can also “trade down,” receiving a $3,500 voucher for trading in an older work truck and purchasing a smaller light-duty truck weighing from 6,000 – 8,500 pounds.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Environmentalists will most likely be disappointed by this compromise, which draws on <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/37605/two-roads-diverged-in-the-cash-for-clunkers-debate">two competing bills</a>. The weaker of the two original bills, sponsored by Rep. Betty Sutton (D-Ohio) and preferred by the auto industry, required that the new vehicle get at least 27 miles per gallon, while the bill favored by environmentalists mandated that the new vehicle be at least 25 percent more fuel efficient than the average vehicle in its class.</p>
<p>But according to <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/36118/dot-issues-new-fuel-efficiency-standards">standards imposed</a> by the Department of Transportation in March, the average efficiency for cars and light trucks in 2011 will be 27.3 mpg. This compromise bill requires that a car get just 22 mpg in order for its new owner to receive a $3,500 voucher.</p>
<p>The clear winner in this arrangement is the auto industry, which will likely see its sales rise as people take advantage of the new incentives. The environment, it appears, will have to content itself with a distant second place.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p><em>TWI is on Twitter. Please follow us <a title="http://twitter.com/WashIndependent" href="http://twitter.com/WashIndependent" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/41919/democrats-reach-compromise-on-cash-for-clunkers/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

