<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; imperialism with a human face</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/imperialism-with-a-human-face/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Most Countries Don&#8217;t Want Us Protecting Persian Gulf Shipping Lanes</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/22350/most-countries-dont-want-us-protecting-persian-gulf-shipping-lanes</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/22350/most-countries-dont-want-us-protecting-persian-gulf-shipping-lanes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Ackerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperialism with a human face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=22350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What the <em>hell</em>, international community? Here we go, using the politically-saleable term &#8220;offshore balancing&#8221; to propose an alternative to invading and occupying Middle East countries, where we do things like protect Persian Gulf shipping lanes with our Navy &#8212; you know, the sealanes from which Gulf oil is exported? The <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/22350/most-countries-dont-want-us-protecting-persian-gulf-shipping-lanes" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the <em>hell</em>, international community? Here we go, using the politically-saleable term &#8220;offshore balancing&#8221; to propose an alternative to invading and occupying Middle East countries, where we do things like protect Persian Gulf shipping lanes with our Navy &#8212; you know, the sealanes from which Gulf oil is exported? The ones that are like the economic carotid artery of the planet? And now you don&#8217;t appreciate <em>that</em>, either.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.abuaardvark.com/2008/12/us-bases-in-gulf-not-especially-popular-except-with-americans.html">Abu Aardvark</a>, WorldPublicOpinion.org <a href="http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/579.php?nid=&amp;id=&amp;pnt=579&amp;lb=">commissioned</a> a poll on international attitudes toward U.S. bases in the Persian Gulf and found remarkable levels of global opposition. Energy-sucking Hong Kong is 59 percent against it. Taiwan, of all places, is 45 percent against it. The frigging <em>Ukraine</em>, which sometimes acts as if it wants to be the 51st state, is 56 percent against it. From their press release:<span id="more-22350"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Majorities opposing US naval bases in the Gulf are highest in the Middle East: Egypt (91%) the Palestinian Territories (90%), Turkey (77%), Jordan (76%) and Azerbaijan (66%).  The only countries where majorities say US naval bases in the Gulf are a good idea are the United States (70%), Nigeria (60%—including 54% of Nigerian Muslims), and Kenya (53%).</p></blockquote>
<p>Interestingly, the question wasn&#8217;t polled in any Persian Gulf country besides Iran. So I asked the poll&#8217;s research director, Clay Ramsay, why that was, and he explained that his firm seeks partner polling-firms in each country that it would like to pose questions in, and for the current round of questioning &#8212; which are not given to the poll firms ahead of time &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t able to partner with polling firms in any Gulf Cooperation Council countries.</p>
<p>What about Iran? You may notice, if you click through the links, that you don&#8217;t actually get an Iranian breakdown on the question. That&#8217;s because the question wasn&#8217;t really asked the same way in Iran. Ramsay emailed me an April 2008 survey his partners conducted &#8212; it&#8217;s a PDF, viewable <a href="http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/apr08/Iran_Apr08_quaire.pdf">here</a> &#8212;  that shows 65 percent of Iranians wanting the U.S. out of the Persian Gulf. Not exactly the same thing but fairly similar. And unsurprising.</p>
<p>Still, this is pretty surprising overall. The U.S. naval presence in the Persian Gulf isn&#8217;t welcome to most people. Well, who&#8217;s stepping up to take over protection of the shipping lanes, hmm? Who wants to be globocop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/22350/most-countries-dont-want-us-protecting-persian-gulf-shipping-lanes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

