<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; hurricane ike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/hurricane-ike/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oil Rigs and Hurricane Ike</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/5844/oil-rigs-and-hurricane-ike</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/5844/oil-rigs-and-hurricane-ike#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment/Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hurricane ike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore drilling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=5844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Don’t blame the reader for being confused. In its <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/14/AR2008091400684.html">front-page piece</a> today examining the devastation wreaked by Hurricane Ike, The Washington Post said this about the storm’s affect on the Gulf’s oil infrastructure:</p>
<blockquote><p>Federal officials said there were no reports of major damage to the region’s critical oil, gas</p></blockquote><p> <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/5844/oil-rigs-and-hurricane-ike" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t blame the reader for being confused. In its <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/14/AR2008091400684.html">front-page piece</a> today examining the devastation wreaked by Hurricane Ike, The Washington Post said this about the storm’s affect on the Gulf’s oil infrastructure:</p>
<blockquote><p>Federal officials said there were no reports of major damage to the region’s critical oil, gas and petrochemical installations.</p></blockquote>
<p>That sounds like good news, except that on page A-9, The Post runs <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/14/AR2008091401659.html">another piece</a> under the headline &#8220;Gas Prices Continue to Rise as Hurricane Destroys Oil Facilities:&#8221;<span id="more-5844"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Gasoline prices once again soared across the country yesterday as federal officials said a preliminary survey of damage found that a number of production platforms in the Gulf of Mexico had been destroyed by Hurricane Ike.</p></blockquote>
<p>One assumes these were not the same federal officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/5844/oil-rigs-and-hurricane-ike/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

