<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; homeland security committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/homeland-security-committee/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sanders to Lieberman: You Would Choose Power Over Party?</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/19357/sanders-to-lieberman-you-would-choose-power-over-party</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/19357/sanders-to-lieberman-you-would-choose-power-over-party#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bernie sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment and public works committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=19357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Politico: It seems that Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) had some choice words for fellow Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.) during yesterday&#8217;s closed-door discussion over how Democrats would punish Lieberman for his alacritous promotion of John McCain through the presidential campaign.
Lieberman had threatened to defect to the Republican Party if Democrats pulled him from his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Politico: It seems that Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) had some choice words for fellow Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.) during <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/19199/lieberman">yesterday&#8217;s closed-door discussion</a> over how Democrats would punish Lieberman for his alacritous promotion of John McCain through the presidential campaign.</p>
<p>Lieberman had threatened to defect to the Republican Party if Democrats pulled him from his perch atop the powerful Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee. (Instead they agreed to remove him from a lesser chairmanship, that of a subcommittee beneath the Environment and Public Works Committee.)</p>
<p>The compromise, though, didn&#8217;t satisfy Sanders. From <a href="http://www.politico.com/huddle/">Politico:</a><span id="more-19357"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) — one of 13 caucus members who voted against the deal — challenged Lieberman over his threat to leave the party if he lost control of the Homeland Security panel. “If you are a Democrat in your heart, why do you need your chairmanship to remain one?” Sanders asked Lieberman, according to a senator who attended the closed-door session.</p></blockquote>
<p>No word on Lieberman&#8217;s response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/19357/sanders-to-lieberman-you-would-choose-power-over-party/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carper: Lieberman Should Pay for Desertion</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/18921/carper-lieberman-should-pay-for-desertion</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/18921/carper-lieberman-should-pay-for-desertion#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom carper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=18921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This in from The Hill:
Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), a close ally of Sen. Joe Lieberman, said the Connecticut Independent should pay a price for his campaign attacks against President-elect Barack Obama.
&#8220;There need to be consequences, and they cannot be insignificant,&#8221; Carper said in a Monday interview with The Hill.
Lieberman, who campaigned actively for GOP presidential [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This in from <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sen.-carper-lieberman-should-pay-consequences-2008-11-17.html">The Hill</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), a close ally of Sen. Joe Lieberman, said the Connecticut Independent should pay a price for his campaign attacks against President-elect Barack Obama.</p>
<p>&#8220;There need to be consequences, and they cannot be insignificant,&#8221; Carper said in a Monday interview with The Hill.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-18921"></span>Lieberman, who campaigned actively for GOP presidential hopeful John McCain in recent months, is set to make an appeal to Democratic colleagues tomorrow over his standing within the caucus. Afterwards, members will hold a secret vote to decide what repercussions, if any, the Homeland Security chairman should face.</p>
<p>After picking up at least six Senate seats this month, Democratic leaders next year won’t have to play the same game of catering to Lieberman out of fear that he would desert the party, thereby eliminating their slim majority in the upper chamber. Still, he&#8217;d be an important ally as Democrats try to overcome the GOP filibuster machine that killed so many Democratic bills over the past two years. That dynamic, along with Obama&#8217;s call for bipartisan comity, might leave Lieberman with just a slap on the wrist.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m very disappointed as a friend and a colleague,&#8221; Carper told The Hill Monday</p>
<p>It remains to be seen whether disappointment will translate into ramification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/18921/carper-lieberman-should-pay-for-desertion/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
