<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; historian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/historian/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Watchdog, Historians Declare Preemptive War on Cheney</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/4973/watchdog-historians-declare-preemptive-war-on-cheney</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/4973/watchdog-historians-declare-preemptive-war-on-cheney#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice president]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonindependent.com/?p=4973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/07/AR2008090702260.html">previewed this morning</a>, Citizens for Responsibility for Ethics, a watchdog group, along with two historians and three historical organizations, <a href="http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/34020">filed a lawsuit in U.S. district court this afternoon</a> against the office of Vice President Dick Cheney and Allen Weinstein, head of the National Archives. <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/4973/watchdog-historians-declare-preemptive-war-on-cheney" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/07/AR2008090702260.html">previewed this morning</a>, Citizens for Responsibility for Ethics, a watchdog group, along with two historians and three historical organizations, <a href="http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/34020">filed a lawsuit in U.S. district court this afternoon</a> against the office of Vice President Dick Cheney and Allen Weinstein, head of the National Archives.</p>
<p>The lawsuit doesn&#8217;t concern anything Cheney has actually done&#8211; like, for example, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.mypublicsquare.com/view/white-house-emails">not produce White House</a> emails. Instead, CREW and the others are trying to make sure that Cheney doesn&#8217;t  use his claim that his office is not part of the executive branch as a reason to withhold his VP records.<span id="more-4973"></span></p>
<p>Back in 2001, President George W. Bush <a href="http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2001/11/eo-pra.html">released an executive order</a> that lays out his views on executive power. Compared with the rest of the document, the section on vice presidential records seems innocuous: &#8220;the presidential records act applies to the executive records of the vice president.&#8221;</p>
<p>The 1978 Presidential Records Act makes clear that the president and vice president must give the National Archives all policy-related documents when their administration ends.</p>
<p>The problem, say the lawsuit&#8217;s plantiffs, is that Cheney has already spurned the National Archives by claiming he&#8217;s not part of the executive branch. And Bush&#8217;s executive order refers to the vice president&#8217;s &#8220;executive records.&#8221;</p>
<p>So what if Cheney claims that administration-defining documents &#8212; the lawsuit specifically cites notes and records on Iraq and energy policy &#8212; are actually &#8220;legislative records&#8221;?</p>
<p>Filing a lawsuit for Cheney&#8217;s complete records while he is still the sitting VP is a unique strategy.</p>
<p>Then again, <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jun/22/nation/na-cheney22">according to the White House</a>, the &#8220;vice presidency is a unique office, neither part of the executive branch nor the legislative branch, but it is attached by the Constitution to the latter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Judicial intervention could  both preserve Cheney&#8217;s records and finally do away with his claim to be floating somewhere above the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/4973/watchdog-historians-declare-preemptive-war-on-cheney/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

