<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; health coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/health-coverage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Continues to Cite Misleading Numbers in Opposing Public Plan</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/51067/gop-continues-to-cite-misleading-numbers-in-opposing-public-plan</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/51067/gop-continues-to-cite-misleading-numbers-in-opposing-public-plan#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Camp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lewin group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uninsured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=51067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Appearing on Fox News yesterday, Rep. Dave Camp (Mich.), senior Republican on the House Ways &#38; Means Committee, reiterated an oft-mentioned, but also misleading, statistic about the effects of a government-backed insurance plan on the private marketplace.</p>
<p>If the Democrats get their way and include the public option, Camp charged, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/51067/gop-continues-to-cite-misleading-numbers-in-opposing-public-plan" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appearing on Fox News yesterday, Rep. Dave Camp (Mich.), senior Republican on the House Ways &amp; Means Committee, reiterated an oft-mentioned, but also misleading, statistic about the effects of a government-backed insurance plan on the private marketplace.</p>
<p>If the Democrats get their way and include the public option, Camp charged, then 114 million Americans would hop from their private plans and into the government-sponsored option, in effect decimating the private insurance market.</p>
<p>That number (it&#8217;s actually 119 million) comes from a Lewin Group study released in April. Yet that study, as NPR&#8217;s Julie Rovner <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105215242">pointed out</a> last month, examined the effects of a spectrum of public-plan designs, with the 119 million figure resulting from a model that allows anyone to join the public plan and sets the plan&#8217;s rates equal to the low rates of Medicare &#8212; a model that the Democrats leading the health reform push have repeatedly rejected.<span id="more-51067"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>But if the public plan is limited to fewer people (perhaps only those in small businesses and individuals), or if the plan pays higher rates to doctors and hospitals, fewer people would join, both because fewer would be allowed and because the plan would be less financially attractive. According to the study, the number of people dropping private coverage could be as low as 10.4 million.</p></blockquote>
<p>Also of note, Republicans are treating the Lewin Group as an objective source of information. (Camp calls it a &#8220;non-partisan think-tank.&#8221;) Yet Rovner&#8217;s description is more apt: Lewin, she writes,  is &#8220;a number-crunching consulting group owned by Ingenix, which is a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group&#8221; &#8212; one of the nation&#8217;s largest insurance companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/51067/gop-continues-to-cite-misleading-numbers-in-opposing-public-plan/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unemployed Can Get Health Care &#8212; and Little Else</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/24647/the-unemployed-can-get-health-care-and-little-else</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/24647/the-unemployed-can-get-health-care-and-little-else#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lillis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cobra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim mcdermott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uninsured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=24647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As the unemployment lines <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/10/business/economy/10jobs.html?hp">grow longer</a> by the month, a report released today reveals why many jobless folks will likely soon lose their health coverage as well.</p>
<p>On average, the cost to cover families under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) &#8212; the federal arrangement allowing laid-off workers <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/24647/the-unemployed-can-get-health-care-and-little-else" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the unemployment lines <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/10/business/economy/10jobs.html?hp">grow longer</a> by the month, a report released today reveals why many jobless folks will likely soon lose their health coverage as well.</p>
<p>On average, the cost to cover families under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) &#8212; the federal arrangement allowing laid-off workers to keep their employer-sponsored health plans by paying the full premium &#8212; consumes 84 percent of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, according to <a href="http://www.familiesusa.org/resources/publications/reports/cobra.html">the report by Families USA</a>, a health care advocacy group.</p>
<p>In 41 states and the District of Columbia, family COBRA costs eat more than three quarters of UI benefits, the report says. In nine of those states, average COBRA premiums are as much as, or more than, the state&#8217;s average UI check.<span id="more-24647"></span></p>
<p>An example: Michigan&#8217;s average UI benefit is $1,276, while the average cost to keep a family covered under COBRA is $1,075. Not much left, in that case, to pay the rent and feed the kids, leaving many with little choice but to drop the COBRA plan.</p>
<p>“COBRA health coverage is great in theory and lousy in reality,” Families USA Executive Director Ron Pollack said in a statement. “For the vast majority of workers who are laid off, they and their families are likely to join the ranks of the uninsured.”</p>
<p>Pollack called for subsidies to help unemployed folks afford their COBRA coverage, or some temporary arrangement allowing jobless folks to access Medicaid benefits.</p>
<p>The problem will likely get worse before it gets better. The Families USA report arrives on the same day that the government released figures revealing that employers dumped 524,000 workers last month, bringing the number of 2008 layoffs to 2.6 million. Nationwide, the unemployment rate now stands at 7.2 percent &#8212; the highest in 16 years.</p>
<p>Democrats in Congress have been pushing for an extension of UI eligibility, but less frequent are the calls for increasing the size of the check. Yesterday, Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wa.), chairman of the House Ways &amp; Means Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, introduced legislation that would hike UI benefits by $50 per week.</p>
<p>Families USA has just made a case why lawmakers should consider such a strategy in the coming stimulus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/24647/the-unemployed-can-get-health-care-and-little-else/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

