<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; graham amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/graham-amendment/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Kills Graham Amendment</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66841/senate-kills-graham-amendment</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/66841/senate-kills-graham-amendment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 suspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce/justice/science appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graham amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Senate just tabled the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/66754/graham-amendment-would-bar-trials-of-terror-suspects-in-federal-court" target="_blank">amendment proposed by Sen. Lindsey Graham</a> (R-S.C.) that would have prohibited use of Justice Department funds to prosecute the 9/11 terror suspects in U.S. federal courts. Effectively, that means it&#8217;s dead.</p>
<p>The amendment, S.A. 2669, to the Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/66841/senate-kills-graham-amendment" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate just tabled the <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/66754/graham-amendment-would-bar-trials-of-terror-suspects-in-federal-court" target="_blank">amendment proposed by Sen. Lindsey Graham</a> (R-S.C.) that would have prohibited use of Justice Department funds to prosecute the 9/11 terror suspects in U.S. federal courts. Effectively, that means it&#8217;s dead.</p>
<p>The amendment, S.A. 2669, to the Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, would have forced the government to try the suspected plotters of the 9/11 attacks in military commissions. The Obama administration opposed the amendment, but still has not announced where it wants to try the 9/11 suspects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/66841/senate-kills-graham-amendment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graham Amendment Would Bar Trials of Terror Suspects in Federal Court</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/66754/graham-amendment-would-bar-trials-of-terror-suspects-in-federal-court</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/66754/graham-amendment-would-bar-trials-of-terror-suspects-in-federal-court#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 plotters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11 suspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appropriations bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article III courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce/justice/science appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graham amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guantanamo bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Webb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khalid Sheikh Mohammed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military commissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=66754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When I wrote <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/66690/prominent-bipartisan-group-supports-trial-of-gtmo-detainees-in-federal-court" target="_blank">my earlier post</a> about the group of illustrious Americans urging the Obama administration to close Guantanamo and bring suspected terrorists to justice in U.S. federal courts, I neglected to mention that Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), joined by Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Jim <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/66754/graham-amendment-would-bar-trials-of-terror-suspects-in-federal-court" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I wrote <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/66690/prominent-bipartisan-group-supports-trial-of-gtmo-detainees-in-federal-court" target="_blank">my earlier post</a> about the group of illustrious Americans urging the Obama administration to close Guantanamo and bring suspected terrorists to justice in U.S. federal courts, I neglected to mention that Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), joined by Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Jim Webb (D-Va.), is today pushing a measure that aims to do just the opposite.</p>
<p>The Graham amendment is expected to come to a vote today during consideration of the Commerce/Justice/Science appropriations bill. The earlier <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/65737/supreme-court-could-confront-constitutionality-of-spending-bill" target="_blank">Homeland Security and Defense Department spending bills</a> already include restrictions on transferring Guantanamo detainees to the United States.<span id="more-66754"></span></p>
<p>This restriction, which is <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1109/911_families_back_Graham_on_miitary_trials.html?showall" target="_blank">reportedly backed by 150 family members of victims of the 9/11 attacks</a>, would bar the trials of the alleged 9/11 plotters in civilian federal courts, effectively forcing them to be tried by military commissions.</p>
<p>The Obama administration <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/64590/911-masterminds-could-face-trial-in-federal-court" target="_blank">has suggested that it wants to try the 9/11 suspects in federal court</a>, and so far has fought to retain the power to decide where the terror suspects will be tried. Last week, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Attorney General Eric Holder <a href="http://www.politico.com/static/PPM110_091103_osd.html" target="_blank">warned Senate leaders</a> that Graham&#8217;s amendment &#8220;would be unwise, and would set a dangerous precedent.&#8221;</p>
<p>The administration has said it will begin announcing where it wants to try the terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay by November 16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/66754/graham-amendment-would-bar-trials-of-terror-suspects-in-federal-court/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

