<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Washington Independent &#187; gingrich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://washingtonindependent.com/tag/gingrich/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://washingtonindependent.com</link>
	<description>National News in Context</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In Colorado polls Gingrich soaring, Perry fading</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/116447/in-colorado-polls-gingrich-soaring-perry-fading</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/116447/in-colorado-polls-gingrich-soaring-perry-fading#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 3/Center Well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=116447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/12/gingrich-up-in-another-pair-of-states.html">A poll released today by Public Policy Polling</a> shows Newt Gingrich with a commanding lead over Mitt Romney in Colorado. The poll shows Gingrich up 37-18 over Romney in Colorado. Michele Bachmann is third with 9 percent and Ron Paul comes in at 6 percent. It wasn’t that long ago <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/116447/in-colorado-polls-gingrich-soaring-perry-fading" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/12/gingrich-up-in-another-pair-of-states.html">A poll released today by Public Policy Polling</a> shows Newt Gingrich with a commanding lead over Mitt Romney in Colorado. The poll shows Gingrich up 37-18 over Romney in Colorado. Michele Bachmann is third with 9 percent and Ron Paul comes in at 6 percent. It wasn’t that long ago that Texas Governor Rick Perry was thought to be leading in Colorado, but according to this poll he is down to 4 percent.<span id="more-116447"></span></p>
<p>In September, the last time PPP polled in Colorado, <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/99495/new-polls-show-perry-leading-romney-but-obama-leading-perry">Perry led Romney 31-18</a>. A Bloomberg poll released at about the same time also had Perry leading in Colorado. Gingrich was considered a fringe candidate at that time.</p>
<p>The polling firm noted that Gingrich seems to have picked up virtually all of Herman Cain’s supporters.</p>
<p>“There’s no one left for conservatives to go to but Gingrich, and he’s proving stronger so far than any of the previous flavors of the month,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “It looks like it’s down to him and Romney.”</p>
<p>Of course, 66 percent of the likely Republican voters surveyed said their choice was not yet locked in stone. Interestingly, though, Gingrich was also named by more people as their second choice than any other candidate, with 18 percent picking him second. Overall, 55 percent of Colorado Republicans picked him first or second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/116447/in-colorado-polls-gingrich-soaring-perry-fading/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socially Conservative Voters Refuse To Be Ignored at Washington Summit</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/97873/socially-conservative-voters-refuse-to-be-ignored-at-washington-summit</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/97873/socially-conservative-voters-refuse-to-be-ignored-at-washington-summit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Luke Johnson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Front Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 1/Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slot 3/Center Well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 gop primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=97873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="453" height="155" src="http://media.washingtonindependent.com/2010/09/Newt2CenterWell-453x155.jpg" class="attachment-index-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Newt2CenterWell-453x155" title="Newt2CenterWell-453x155" margin-bottom="2px" /><p>“Don’t let them put you in the back of the bus,” former Pennsylvania  Sen. Rick Santorum (R) said to a full ballroom at the Values Voters  Summit &#8212; organized by the Family Research Council &#8212; in Washington  Friday.</p>
<p>[Congress1] He expounded on that idea to the crowd of about 2,000 <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/97873/socially-conservative-voters-refuse-to-be-ignored-at-washington-summit" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="453" height="155" src="http://media.washingtonindependent.com/2010/09/Newt2CenterWell-453x155.jpg" class="attachment-index-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Newt2CenterWell-453x155" title="Newt2CenterWell-453x155" margin-bottom="2px" /><div id="attachment_97877" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 463px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-97877" href="http://washingtonindependent.com/97873/socially-conservative-voters-refuse-to-be-ignored-at-washington-summit/newt2centerwell-453x155-2"><img class="size-full wp-image-97877" title="Newt2CenterWell-453x155" src="http://washingtonindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Newt2CenterWell-453x1551.jpg" alt="" width="453" height="155" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Newt Gingrich at the 2010 Value Voters Summit. (ZumaPress)</p></div>
<p>“Don’t let them put you in the back of the bus,” former Pennsylvania  Sen. Rick Santorum (R) said to a full ballroom at the Values Voters  Summit &#8212; organized by the Family Research Council &#8212; in Washington  Friday.</p>
<p>[Congress1] He expounded on that idea to the crowd of about 2,000 Christian  conservatives, saying they shouldn&#8217;t let &#8220;people come out and tell us  that we have to put the values issues in the back of the bus, we have to  have a truce on the values issues because the economic issues are  paramount.&#8221; Santorum countered that &#8220;we can have no economic freedom  unless we have good, virtuous moral people inspired by their faith.”</p>
<p>Beyond encouraging both the continued fight against the policies of  the Obama administration and an ouster of Democrats in the midterm  elections, conservative politician after politician declared to the  attendees of the conference that amidst a recession and the largely  economic-based tea party movement, values still mattered.</p>
<p>For instance, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) devoted the majority of his  speech to the “straightening out” of a voter who was not a social  conservative but a fiscal conservative.</p>
<p>Though no speaker mentioned him, Indiana governor and possible GOP  2012 presidential candidate Mitch Daniels is a source of this  consternation. The next president “would have to call a truce on the  so-called social issues,” he <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/ride-along-mitch?page=12">told</a> The Weekly Standard. Even so, the vast majority of the GOP &#8212; including  Daniels himself, who is still pro-life and favors reinstating <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/International/story?id=6716958&amp;page=1">&#8220;Mexico City Policy&#8221;</a> &#8212; remains conservative on social issues.</p>
<p>Economics are morals and morals are economics, said many Republican  politicians during the conference. As former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee  said, “The meltdown of Wall Street was not a money crisis, it was a  moral crisis.” Sen. Jim DeMint said the same thing about fiscal policy:  “One of the largest costs of the federal government is related to the  values issues, to the dysfunctional society.”</p>
<p>Not everyone followed this theme. Mitt Romney, former Massachusetts  govenror and CEO of Bain &amp; Company, talked largely about a decline  in economic freedom under President Obama. Possibly alluding to the  fusion of economic issues and idyllic conservative values, Romney gave  rambling anecdote about Christmas shopping at Wal-Mart, to show that the  “founders (of those companies) have shaped the way those enterprises  are.” The result: polite applause and laughter.</p>
<p>Same-sex marriage, not long ago the headlining wedge issue for social  conservatives, did not receive the strongest reaction from the crowd,  taking a backseat to ovation-inducing lines about Islam and the proposed  Islamic community center in Lower Manhattan. Conservative pundit Bill  Bennett said, “Muslims proclaim themselves the new victims, I&#8217;m sorry  they are not.” However, he insisted, “As a people, we are not  Islamophobic. We are right to have questions about Islam.” President of  American Values Gary Bauer said of New York City Mayor Michael  Bloomberg, “Next time you want to give a speech on tolerance, try giving  it in Mecca!”</p>
<p>Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), chair of the House GOP conference, also  gave a barnstorming speech, connecting stem-cell research, abortion and  marriage to fiscal issues. (&#8220;You want to find savings? Let&#8217;s cut funding  to research that destroys human embryos in the name of science and  let’s deny any and all funding to Planned Parenthood.”)</p>
<p>On the wings of this speech, Pence won the conference&#8217;s 2012  Presidential Straw Poll, beating out Huckabee by 11 votes, 170-159. The  win will no doubt encourage speculation of a presidential run for Pence.  However, it remains extremely difficult to win a nomination, let alone  the presidency, from the House of Representatives, partly given to a low  familiarity level among a general electorate. The only sitting House  member to ever win the White House was James Garfield in 1880.</p>
<p>But Rep. Pence wasn’t the only politician to benefit from (or fall  victim to) newfound speculation and unreasonable expectations. Social  conservative activist Christine O’Donnell, who upset Rep. Mike Castle  for the Delaware Republican Senate nomination Tuesday, <a href="../97864/christine-o%E2%80%99donnell-tells-conservatives-to-charge-ahead">gave a largely boilerplate speech</a> against the “elites” and “D.C. cocktail circuit” who did not think she could win. (She remains <a href="http://www.pollster.com/polls/de/10-de-sen-ge-ovco.php">11 to 16 points behind</a> in recent polls.) She did not take questions from the media.</p>
<p>Christine O’Donnell &#8212; a genuine insurgent candidate not endorsed by  the national or state GOP in the primary &#8212; wasn&#8217;t the only one railing  against “the establishment.” Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich appeared  Saturday morning to announce, “the establishment is in a state of  shock.” Gingrich &#8212; seemingly oblivious to his former position as a  powerful and public three-term House speaker &#8212; said, “The grassroots is  7-0 over the establishment!”</p>
<p>Establishment leaders like Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell  (Ky.), House Minority Leader John Boehner (Ohio) and House Minority Whip  Eric Cantor (Va.) were rarely, if ever, mentioned.</p>
<p>Gingrich may have nailed the center of gravity in the Republican  party: “I&#8217;ll let you decide whether it&#8217;s Palin-DeMint or DeMint-Palin,”  he said of a potential 2012 ticket. He admired DeMint’s creation of the  influential Senate Conservatives Fund PAC and Palin&#8217;s messaging prowess  on Twitter and Facebook. Gingrich, who lives in the leafy Washington  suburb of McLean, Va., said about the surprise win of Christine  O’Donnell, who both Palin and Sen. DeMint endorsed, “I’ll go out on a  limb and say no one in the D.C. establishment gets it.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/97873/socially-conservative-voters-refuse-to-be-ignored-at-washington-summit/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liddy Hopes Sotomayor Won&#8217;t Make Key Decisions &#8216;When She&#8217;s Menstruating&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://washingtonindependent.com/44966/liddy-hopes-sotomayor-wont-decide-key-decisions-when-shes-menstruating</link>
		<comments>http://washingtonindependent.com/44966/liddy-hopes-sotomayor-wont-decide-key-decisions-when-shes-menstruating#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Eviatar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog (deprecated)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://washingtonindependent.com/?p=44966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you thought all the right-wing zealots calling Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor &#8220;a racist&#8221; were crazy, but not quite offensive and misogynistic enough for your taste. Never fear: conservative radio host and convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy kicks it up a few notches by <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/29/liddy-sotoyamor-menstruating/">worrying about </a>the impact <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/44966/liddy-hopes-sotomayor-wont-decide-key-decisions-when-shes-menstruating" class="read_more">More...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you thought all the right-wing zealots calling Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor &#8220;a racist&#8221; were crazy, but not quite offensive and misogynistic enough for your taste. Never fear: conservative radio host and convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy kicks it up a few notches by <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/29/liddy-sotoyamor-menstruating/">worrying about </a>the impact Sotomayor&#8217;s menstrual cycle may have on her jurisprudence:</p>
<blockquote><p>LIDDY: Let’s hope that the key conferences aren’t when she’s menstruating or something, or just before she’s going to menstruate. That would really be bad. Lord knows what we would get then.</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s OK if female Supreme Court Justices are post-menopausal?  Or have no feelings or sentiments at all?<span id="more-44966"></span></p>
<p>Even if the conservative crazies are energizing the base or perhaps helping to raise money for strapped right-wing organizations, these sorts of attacks don&#8217;t seem to be having much effect on Republican senators, who are the ones who have to vote on the nomination.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/29/liddy-sotoyamor-menstruating/">ThinkProgress reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Last night, Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/29/cornyn-racist-terrible/">called the attacks &#8220;terrible&#8221;</a> and &#8220;wrong.&#8221; Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) was asked if he agreed with Newt Gingrich’s characterization of Sotomayor as a &#8220;<a href="https://twitter.com/newtgingrich/status/1937323138">Latina woman racist</a>.” “<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/05/27/hatch-gingrich-sotomayor/">No, I don’t agree with that</a>,” Hatch replied.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://washingtonindependent.com/44966/liddy-hopes-sotomayor-wont-decide-key-decisions-when-shes-menstruating/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

